Den 11-02-2005 kl 12:09 skrev David Rankin:
From: Josh Kelley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
david rankin wrote:
Well, no, I'm not positive, but when whatever hangs, I get a big
slowdown in file access, file open, etc.. from XP. When I then go and
check the logs the transport end point and
david rankin wrote:
Well, no, I'm not positive, but when whatever hangs, I get a big
slowdown in file access, file open, etc.. from XP. When I then go and
check the logs the transport end point and getpeername is the only
thing that shows up in the log. I admit I haven't had time to put up a
From: Josh Kelley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
david rankin wrote:
Well, no, I'm not positive, but when whatever hangs, I get a big
slowdown in file access, file open, etc.. from XP. When I then go and
check the logs the transport end point and getpeername is the only
thing that shows up in the log. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
david rankin wrote:
|
|I'm trying to solve some log errors I getting. I
| have samba 3.0.7 installed on Suse 9.0. It has been
| happening intermittently for several months. I don't know
| if this is XP client related or what. Any thoughts:
| The
From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
david rankin wrote:
|
|I'm trying to solve some log errors I getting. I
| have samba 3.0.7 installed on Suse 9.0. It has been
| happening intermittently for several months. I don't know
| if this is XP
Den 10-02-2005 kl 13:06 skrev david rankin:
From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
david rankin wrote:
|
|I'm trying to solve some log errors I getting. I
| have samba 3.0.7 installed on Suse 9.0. It has been
| happening
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
david rankin wrote:
|
| I know that Windows XP clients try to connect to port
| 139 and 445 in parallel and drop the connection to port
| 139 if the connect to 445 is successful. This is probably
| what you are seeing.
|
|
| Thanks Jerry,
|
|That
From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
david rankin wrote:
|
| I know that Windows XP clients try to connect to port
| 139 and 445 in parallel and drop the connection to port
| 139 if the connect to 445 is successful. This is probably
| what you are seeing.
|
|
| Thanks Jerry,
|
|That