On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 09:29:07AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> The problem is that none of us uses IRIX on a daily basis, so we personally
> don't have a strong enough need to create those packages.
SGI create a "Samba for IRIX" product based on the main Samba code tree,
once it has passe
Hello, Hannu!
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 12:25:17PM +0200, Hannu Virtanen wrote:
> I feel this is, what i imagined, Samba is Linux software in the
> future(version 3). My problem is, i do not have compilers, nor do i want to
> learn all the compile options. I feel to base my samba use for binary
> pa
Volker,
I feel this is, what i imagined, Samba is Linux software in the
future(version 3). My problem is, i do not have compilers, nor do i want to
learn all the compile options. I feel to base my samba use for binary
packages and think that it is not good development(Billy Gates loves things
like
Hi!
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 08:53:05AM +0200, Hannu Virtanen wrote:
> Now You have Samba 3.0.2, but no UNIX Samba 3 binaries. Are these binaries
> coming and when. Why do You not answer. I am interesting of SGI IRIX
> version.
The problem is that none of us uses IRIX on a daily basis, so we perso