Hi Volker,
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 09:14:23AM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
>> I think this change is wrong because, selret is a pointer and we already
>> have this check (directly above):
>
> Gna. I have first done this in 3.5, where selrtn is not a
> pointer. I have then just taken
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 09:14:23AM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> I think this change is wrong because, selret is a pointer and we already
> have this check (directly above):
Gna. I have first done this in 3.5, where selrtn is not a
pointer. I have then just taken the same patch and app
Hi Volker,
I think this change is wrong because, selret is a pointer and we already
have this check (directly above):
if (*selrtn <= 0) {
/*
* No fd ready
*/
return false;
}
I've done some m
