On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Tim Potter wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 02:52:01PM +0200, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
>
> > proper args to continue or finish the enumeration. It may be annoying to
> > write such code in each place we use client side of enumeration, so I
> > propose to write a "higher level
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 02:52:01PM +0200, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
> proper args to continue or finish the enumeration. It may be annoying to
> write such code in each place we use client side of enumeration, so I
> propose to write a "higher level" function which could take care of doing
> it pro
Hello everybody,
I am experiencing problems
with my samba 2.2 , We are working with an application
called “tasktimer” which places some kind
of native database on a sama share and accesses it
with something like an ODBC driver. After a short period of time, the database
can not be accessed
Hello all
just a quick note to inform you that after getting 2.2.4pre from CVS
(15/04/2002)I still recieve a internal error message when using the recycle
bin VFS and the MPEG file in the same dir. Also I am getting the same error
message thet Daniel Beschorner reported about fstat on a bog s
Oh, I should also mention...
Microsoft recently released a newer SMB specification of their own.
Do *NOT* download Microsoft's documentation.
- From all reports, it is less complete than the SNIA document (even
0.9).
- It has a license that prohibits readers from releasing code under
the LGP
Paul Vanlint wrote:
>
> This is what the RFC says:
Sorry to be pedantic but it is not an RFC, just an expired
Internet-Draft. I think it is important to highlight that.
> It says that this is an expired ietf draft, so perhaps there is a
> newer one, but this should give you a start.
Yep.
The
...but...
If that is the problem, then it's still important to know which box is
causing the NAME RELEASE REQUEST DEMAND message to be sent, and why.
There should not be any unique #1C unique names on your
network. If there are, then there is a misconfiguration somewhere.
Note that it would on
Title: RE: nmblookup conflict
Thanks Volker! The Google search worked. Here's what I found after some tunneling:
http://www.pgp.com/research/covert/advisories/044.asp
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/Security/Bulletin/ms00-047.asp
http://www.microsoft.co
No, it is not an NFS mount. But the first problem is more relevant and still
occurs.
[2002/04/11 09:39:06, 0] smbd/open.c:open_file(179)
Error doing fstat on open file schnieders/Recent/Glsynt40.lnk (No such
file or directory)
Many error messages fill the log during every logoff / profile writ
Hi Thomas,
go to smbd/vfs.c and change the call to dlerror() to sys_dlerror(), that
will get you
past your compile problem on 2.2.
Haven't looked any further at this yet; let me know if you run into other
issues on 10.20
Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROT
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 02:09:58PM -0500, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
> IIRC, NT will go into the Conflict state if it gets a "NAME RELEASE
> REQUEST DEMAND". See my docs: http://www.ubiqx.org/cifs/NetBIOS.html
> Look for the string "NAME RELEASE REQUEST DEMAND". It is really easy to
> code thi
Here it comes. This version doesn't introduce renaming of the status code.
Looks better ? :)
cheers,
++
|Rafal 'Mimir' Szczesniak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
|*BSD, GNU/Linux and Samba /
|___
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Ariel Mella wrote:
> how is the state of trust relationship between samba domain and NT 4
> domains?
Partly the job is done, but some code yet needs finishing.
> in what versions samba2.2x or samba3.x?
3.x
cheers,
+---
On Sun, 14 Apr 2002, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> I would expect the current code comes pretty close already actually.
>
> I'll be interested to see what you actually need to change.
OK. This is another fix to enumerationn code. Major changes:
- fix for returned error codes during enumeration
- c
Ariel Mella wrote:
>
> how is the state of trust relationship between samba domain and NT 4
> domains?
> in what versions samba2.2x or samba3.x?
> thanks
Developemnt currently underway in HEAD. This won't appear in 2.2.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett [EMAI
how is the state of trust relationship between samba domain and NT 4
domains?
in what versions samba2.2x or samba3.x?
thanks
This is what the RFC says:
typedef unsigned char UCHAR; // 8 unsigned bits
typedef unsigned short USHORT;// 16 unsigned bits
typedef unsigned long ULONG; // 32 unsigned bits
typedef struct {
ULONG LowPart;
LONG HighPart;
} LARGE_INTEGER; //
Hello Rainer,
thank you for your answer!
The binaries on samba.org are very old ... newer are on the HP/UX Porting
Centre (2.2.3a) http://hpux.connect.org.uk/
... but this ist not that what I need!
My last compile for Samba 2.2.4pre from 21 Feb was OK! The compile from
yesterday (after the ns
Á¤º¸Åë½ÅºÎ ±Ç°í »çÇ׿¡ ÀÇ°Å Á¦¸ñ¿¡ [±¤°í]¶ó°í Ç¥±âÇÑ ±¤°í ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ¾È³çÇϽʴϱî?¹«·ÊÇÏ°Ô Çã¶ôµµ ¾øÀÌ ÀÌ·¸°Ô ¸ÞÀÏÀ» º¸³»°Ô µÇ¾î¼ Á¤¸» Á˼۽º·´°Ô»ý°¢ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÀúÈñ ȸ»ç´Â ºÎµ¿»ê ¸Å¹° Á¤º¸È¸»ç·Î½á ±Ý¹ø ȨÆäÀÌÁö¸¦°³¼³ÇÏ¿© ¾î¶»°Ôµç ³Î¸® ¾Ë·Á¾ß µÇ°Ú±â¿¡ ÀÌ·¸°Ô ¹«·Ê¸¦ ¹«¸¨¾²°í¸ÞÀÏÀ» º¸³»°Ô µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù.
hi
i am new to samba . i am going through the samba source code.
in the smb.h header an offset into message for commmon items has been specified.
it states that smb_com starts at offset 8. can anyone please tell me the exact order of where, what is placed in the packet?
without the words and bytes
20 matches
Mail list logo
