Gerald Carter wrote:
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Ben McConaghy wrote:
[2002/04/23 11:57:59, 0, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] smbd/notify_kernel.c:kernel_notify_init(190)
Failed to setup RT_SIGNAL_NOTIFY handler
Apart from this message samba seems to run as expected, however I'm
puzzled
On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 01:16:25PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> Actually, this was already done in HEAD using the -i (interactive)
> flag so that's what I just added to smbd/nmbd in 2.2.3.
I just noticed that when using the -i flag {n,s}mbd seem to not use the ``log
file'' directive; at least n
Hello,
Not sure if anyone else has run across the same thing: after making and installing the
stock audit.so module, trying to write a file to the share causes a segfault. The
problem is these lines from smbd/vfs.c:
struct vfs_ops default_vfs_ops = {
...
#if defined(HAVE_NO_ACLS)
On Sat, 27 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > the /etc/smbpasswd file format to store the callback number.
>
> This is where LDAP shines. I think we already store the callback number
> but there may be other RPCs required.
>
> I like the way we can easily extend the LDAP stuff - much better
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 10:35:41AM +0200, Jean Francois Micouleau wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Alex Keahan wrote:
>
> > For the time being, I am going to implement a temporary solution, but
> > I would really like to see this fixed in the 2.2 branch.
>
> it won't be fixed in 2.2, it's way
The unsubscribe information for the Samba Technical list are contained
in every message.
Do not ever follow the unsubscribe information from spam. It will only
cause more spam to be sent to you.
-John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personal Opinion Only
Suhasini Rao wrote:
> Please unsubscribe.
Please unsubscribe.
¢Æ ÀÌ ¸ÞÀÏÀº ¿µ¾îÇнÀ ÇÁ·Î±×·¥°ü·Ã ±¤°í¿ë¸ÞÀÏ ÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ¹ß¼ÛÀü¿ë ¸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´°í À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ÀÌ¿Ü¿¡ ±ÍÇÏ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¾Æ¹«·± Á¤º¸µµ °¡Áö°í ÀÖÁö¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù.
Ȥ ºÒÇÊ¿äÇÑ Á¤º¸°Å³ª ±âºÐÀÌ »óÇϽÅÀÏÀÌ ÀÖÀ¸½Ã¸é ±íÀÌ »ç°úµå¸³´Ï´Ù. ¾Æ·¡ÀÇ ¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ¸¦ ÇØÁÖ½Ã¸é ´Ù½Ã´Â º¸³»´Â ÀÏÀÌ ¾øÀ»°ÍÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ¢Æ
¢Æ This ma
Hello,
the following patch checks if the secret_init call in winbind failes.
By
Andreas
--- winbindd.c Sat Apr 27 09:17:52 2002
+++ winbindd.andSat Apr 27 17:38:49 2002
@@ -680,7 +680,8 @@
{
load_interfaces();
- secrets_init();
+ if (secrets_init()==False)
+
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
Pdb_MySQL is finished. It's available from
http://nl.linux.org/~jelmer/pdb_mysql-1.0.tar.gz
It is fully customizable (all column names, table name, etc), supports
add/mod/del of accounts and is somewhat better documented.
Jelmer
- --
Jelmer V
Hi Noel
I am able to kill this processes without any problem.
I am testing 2.2.4pre as well in an test environment.
But there (Murphy) the error never occurs (even not with 2.2.2) :-(
Thank you
hanjoerg
Noel Kelly schrieb:
> I had this problem as well. Very nasty as the smbds are unkillable
I had this problem as well. Very nasty as the smbds are unkillable ?
The best I can suggest is to try the 2.2.4pre version (or wait for the
official release) as it seems by the far the most stable since 2.2.2 was
released. I have not had one of these unkillables for a while now.
Also I suspect
Hi,
I am running Samba 2.2.2 and from time to time smbd processes hang and
take 100% of CPU time (Redhat 6.2, Win2K Clients).
PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT LIB %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
16895 root 17 0 968 6436 R 0 99.9 0.0 12768m smbd
smbstatus shows:
Samba
13 matches
Mail list logo
