On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 06:14:22PM +0200, Erwin Eder wrote:
> please consider some spam protection,
Going over the log files it seems that about 80 messages a day are being
blocked by spews. The RBL is blocking maybe 5-6 per day. I added
spamcop to the list tody and it seems to be blocking a l
Jeremy Allison wrote:
> So I guess that means we made it onto the OS CD (finally :-) :-).
> Dave CB - want to comment ?
My thanks go out to the unsung team who built
the software companion CDs, and walked the
long road to the standard distribution, fame
and fortune
Samba
is shipped with their Sun Cobalt Qube product as standard. I have been
using the Qube 3 products for about 8 months with the Samba product and have had
very little problems.
Ryan
-Original Message-From: Jeremy Allison
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2
Well you won't find them shouting about it, but if you dig down
in their web pages on Solaris 9 you'll find this :
"Common Linux applications, such as Samba, Apache, Linux (GNU) commands,
etc., are included in the Solaris 9 Operating Environment. The Solaris
Software Companion CD has an even more
> is DNSbl listed. by korea.services.net Blocked due to spam, see
> http://korea.services.net/blocked.phtml
> is DNSbl listed. by bl.spamcop.net
> is DNSbl listed. by blackholes.five-ten-sg.com
> is DNSbl listed. by xbl.selwerd.cx (except 105.88.223.210)
They are currently using spam protection.
210.101.59.5
211.37.22.59
61.81.92.27
211.204.237.228
210.181.118.165
211.218.224.62
210.223.88.105
211.245.216.4
Every single one -
is DNSbl listed. by korea.services.net Blocked due to spam, see
http://korea.services.net/blocked.phtml
is DNSbl listed. by bl.spamcop.net
is DNSbl listed. by bla
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 01:01:05AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> (I was going to commit this, but decided that I should get some comment
> first)
>
> More code cleanup - this lot a bit more dodgy than the last:
>
> The aim is to trim pwd_cache down to size. Its overly complex, and a
> pain to
(I was going to commit this, but decided that I should get some comment
first)
More code cleanup - this lot a bit more dodgy than the last:
The aim is to trim pwd_cache down to size. Its overly complex, and a
pain to
deal with. With a header comment like this: 'obfusticaion is planned'
I thin
Title: Untitled Document
* º»¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸Åë½Å¸Á ÀÌ¿ëÃËÁø ¹× Á¤º¸º¸È£ µî¿¡ °üÇÑ ¹ý·ü Á¦ 50Á¶¿¡
ÀÇ°ÅÇÑ <±¤°í>¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
* E-mail ÁÖ¼Ò´Â ÀÎÅͳݻ󿡼 ÃëµæÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÁÖ¼Ò¿Ü ¾î¶°ÇÑ °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸µµ °¡Áö°í ÀÖÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù.
* <¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ>¸¦
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 11:16:57AM +, Claudia Moroder wrote:
> Hello,
>
> does VFS not work in the latest samba 3 cvs ? It worked
> fine two weeks ago. Now I get a panic using the standard
> skel.so.
I've updated stackable VFS patch based on Saturday's CVS update and both
non-stackable and st
Hello,
does VFS not work in the latest samba 3 cvs ? It worked
fine two weeks ago. Now I get a panic using the standard
skel.so.
Bye
Andreas
-
This mail sent through IMP: http://web.horde.org/imp/
smbd.log
Description: Binary data
Hi,
compiling yesterday's CVS version of samba on AIX 4.3 breaks in lib/util.c
with the following error message (warnings removed)
Compiling lib/util.c
from /soft/samba/samba-pre3/samba-pre3-20020521/source/lib/util.c:23:
/usr/include/rpcsvc/yp_prot.h:342: warning: `struct ypall
12 matches
Mail list logo