Re: [PATCH] Various

2002-05-24 Thread Andrew Bartlett
Jelmer Vernooij wrote: Hi, Here's the patch that includes this afternoon's fix for current CVS, together with some other things: - fix passdb, don't loop when loading all backends fails - passdb fails when loading of at least one backend fails - convert net to popt - convert status

Re: Pages in a printjob

2002-05-24 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 02:55:58PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote: I'm working on a system where customers have to pay for pages they print, and as such it is essential that I have the pagecount of a printjob before I send it to the printer. Looking at the samba sources the number of pages

VFS: create/append log file

2002-05-24 Thread troutb
I've trying to create a log file in a VFS module without using syslog. I want to pass in a logfile name via options. But, when I put the following in the vfs_init section. FILE *log; log = open( path, a+ ); fprintf( log, Logging actions for ...' ); it hangs ... on the fprintf and I

Re: Thanks for fixing oplock.c for Linux 2.0 in 2_2 CVS

2002-05-24 Thread Richard Bollinger
How embarassing... still apparently broken / inconsistent :-( Client is win98 4.10.1998. [2002/05/24 08:36:40, 0] smbd/server.c:main(707) smbd version 2.2.5-pre started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2002 (rab@LS01) (gcc version 2.7.2.3) #1 Fri May 24 07:21:54 EDT 2002

Re: Pages in a printjob

2002-05-24 Thread John E. Malmberg
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 02:55:58PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote: I'm working on a system where customers have to pay for pages they print, and as such it is essential that I have the pagecount of a printjob before I send it to the printer. This is a difficult thing to do accurately. For

bug with samba bugs ....

2002-05-24 Thread Hunt, Bryan
http://bugs.samba.org/cgi-bin/samba-bugs keeps timing out, I notice there are 1998 messages in the spam folder, could this be impacting on it's response time ? --B -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:54 PM To: [EMAIL

Re: VFS: create/append log file

2002-05-24 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 FILE *log; log = open( path, a+ ); fprintf( log, Logging actions for ...' ); it hangs ... on the fprintf and I get an empty file. I am not a good C program ... is this the right calls and procedure for making a log file in a VFS

Filenames management error

2002-05-24 Thread Raúl Martínez
Hi. There may be a (very funny, instead) problem with filenames management Problem Description: - Long filenames with accents (specially if uc) cannot be retrieved from the server DEPENDING ON THE EXISTENCE OF OTHER FILES WITH SIMILAR NAME OR THE STORING ORDER. System Description:

tabs and formating - was Re: [PATCH] winbind id assignment module

2002-05-24 Thread John E. Malmberg
Mike Gerdts wrote: On Sat, 2002-05-18 at 20:54, Andrew Bartlett wrote: This looks *much* better. I'm not sure on the 'reload' functionality, but I suppose its a good idea. Other than minor things like indenting, (Try 8-space tabs) I think this is well on its way to inclusion. As for

Urgent Please Help

2002-05-24 Thread Anil Dubey
Dear Samba Technical Team Members, I didnot know how and to whom send my problem so I am writing to you in hope of getting some solution from your side. Well my problem is that We are having a HP-UX 11i Server on that we have CIFS/9000 Server installed. Now first of let me explain you what we

Re: tabs and formating - was Re: [PATCH] winbind id assignment module

2002-05-24 Thread Jim McDonough
There does not seem to be a style book for coding on the SAMBA project. Thank goodness... There are some guidelines, more about technical content than format, in the HEAD cvs tree, in samba/source/CodingSuggestions Jim McDonough IBM Linux Technology Center Samba

Re: Printer administration problem in Samba 2.2.4

2002-05-24 Thread Samuli A Valo
I am currently having similar problem. Our enviroment consist of native NT4 pdc+bdc and several samba (2.2.4) servers (running under Linux) doing actual work as member servers of the domain :) There are problems with viewing and setting printer properties on the server. These problems seems

Re: Thanks for fixing oplock.c for Linux 2.0 in 2_2 CVS

2002-05-24 Thread Jeremy Allison
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 10:00:43AM -0400, Richard Bollinger wrote: How embarassing... still apparently broken / inconsistent :-( Client is win98 4.10.1998. [2002/05/24 08:36:40, 0] smbd/server.c:main(707) smbd version 2.2.5-pre started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team

Re: Printer administration problem in Samba 2.2.4

2002-05-24 Thread Gerald Carter
On Fri, 24 May 2002, Samuli A Valo wrote: I am currently having similar problem. Our enviroment consist of native NT4 pdc+bdc and several samba (2.2.4) servers (running under Linux) doing actual work as member servers of the domain :) There are problems with viewing and setting

Re: DCERPC dissecting and srvsvc_srv_get_get_info ...

2002-05-24 Thread Gerald Carter
On Fri, 24 May 2002, Richard Sharpe wrote: Hi, I am trying to dissect some SRVSVC RPCs, and am running into a small problem with the info 101 etc structs. The structure goes like this ... LONG level Ptr to structure Structure { LONG Platform ID Ptr to name LONG

Re: Thanks for fixing oplock.c for Linux 2.0 in 2_2 CVS

2002-05-24 Thread Richard Bollinger
OK... time for a brain flush and refill... I went back and verified my test conditions and determined that the same failure can be demonstrated with every server platform we own running Samba 2.X with oplocks enabled and with a Win98 client. Here's the setup: On Win98 client: net use i:

Re: bug with samba bugs ....

2002-05-24 Thread Simo Sorce
Ask tridge he created it? I asked for a simple drop of the spam :) On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 19:58, Gerald Carter wrote: On Fri, 24 May 2002, Hunt, Bryan wrote: http://bugs.samba.org/cgi-bin/samba-bugs keeps timing out, I notice there are 1998 messages in the spam folder, could this be

Re: bug with samba bugs ....

2002-05-24 Thread Gerald Carter
On 24 May 2002, Simo Sorce wrote: Ask tridge he created it? I asked for a simple drop of the spam :) I clean it out. cheers, jerry

Re: Samba as a gateway to OpenAFS

2002-05-24 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 10:44:54AM -0600, Steve Holstead wrote: Unfotunately, we have the need to offer AFS space to our users via SAMBA. In doing so, we have had to introduce a number of patches to accomplish this task. The methodology was discussed at the LISA 2000 conference re:

Re: Pages in a printjob

2002-05-24 Thread Travis Freeland
Off topic because it's not samba.. but we had a samba based one going first.. And ended up deciding it was not necessary to place another middleman between the client and the printer. Macs/Windows/Unix all have pretty good implementations of lpr. We put in a solution based around lprng and

Re: Pages in a printjob

2002-05-24 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Travis Freeland wrote: For page counting we simply ask the printer how many pages it printed after the job is complete. Unfortunately I need to know the number of pages in advance in order to decide of a user has enough credit available. Wichert. --

Re: VFS: create/append log file (UPDATE) - help

2002-05-24 Thread troutb
FILE *log; log = fopen( /tmp/x.log, a+ ); fprintf( log, Logging actions for ... ); fopen returns errno(22) Invalid argument this code works great in a test program .. is there something about VFS that would prevent fopen ?? I've trying to create a log file in a VFS module

Re: VFS: create/append log file (UPDATE) - I got it ...

2002-05-24 Thread troutb
I had the a+ transposed. woops should of cut and pasted, but thats so windows FILE *log; log = fopen( /tmp/x.log, a+ ); fprintf( log, Logging actions for ... ); fopen returns errno(22) Invalid argument this code works great in a test program .. is there something about VFS that

Re: VFS: create/append log file (UPDATE) - I got it ...

2002-05-24 Thread troutb
I had the a+ transposed. woops should of cut and pasted, but thats so windows FILE *log; log = fopen( /tmp/x.log, a+ ); fprintf( log, Logging actions for ... ); fopen returns errno(22) Invalid argument this code works great in a test program .. is there something about VFS that

Re: Thanks for fixing oplock.c for Linux 2.0 in 2_2 CVS

2002-05-24 Thread Jeremy Allison
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 02:05:12PM -0400, Richard Bollinger wrote: OK... time for a brain flush and refill... I went back and verified my test conditions and determined that the same failure can be demonstrated with every server platform we own running Samba 2.X with oplocks enabled and

Re: Thanks for fixing oplock.c for Linux 2.0 in 2_2 CVS

2002-05-24 Thread Richard Bollinger
Same exact failure with Linux 2.0.38 Linux 2.2.20 Linux 2.4.18 SunOS 5.6 I'll have to let you know Tuesday if it fails with just any old executable... but I'd expect it would. Rich B - Original Message - From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Richard Bollinger

Re: Thanks for fixing oplock.c for Linux 2.0 in 2_2 CVS

2002-05-24 Thread Jeremy Allison
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 07:16:07PM -0400, Richard Bollinger wrote: Same exact failure with Linux 2.0.38 Linux 2.2.20 Linux 2.4.18 SunOS 5.6 I'll have to let you know Tuesday if it fails with just any old executable... but I'd expect it would. Well can you send me the

Re: samba-patches heads up

2002-05-24 Thread Andrew Bartlett
Green, Paul wrote: A brief note that I am building Samba 2.2.4 with a fussy POSIX environment and catching a number of small bugs and minor glitches in the source code. I am posting the patches to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am pleased to say that the source code of Samba 2.2.4 is significantly

Re: Thanks for fixing oplock.c for Linux 2.0 in 2_2 CVS

2002-05-24 Thread Jeremy Allison
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 02:05:12PM -0400, Richard Bollinger wrote: OK... time for a brain flush and refill... I went back and verified my test conditions and determined that the same failure can be demonstrated with every server platform we own running Samba 2.X with oplocks enabled and

Re: Thanks for fixing oplock.c for Linux 2.0 in 2_2 CVS

2002-05-24 Thread Richard Bollinger
Right... or if it times out because of the dead time setting... so it's shouldn't be that rare in the wild. I have a feeling that a lot of folks just disable oplocks to avoid the troubles. My test at work showed that the problem did not occur with a W2K server when I forced the disconnect

Re: Thanks for fixing oplock.c for Linux 2.0 in 2_2 CVS

2002-05-24 Thread Jeremy Allison
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 10:26:00PM -0400, Richard Bollinger wrote: Right... or if it times out because of the dead time setting... so it's shouldn't be that rare in the wild. I have a feeling that a lot of folks just disable oplocks to avoid the troubles. My test at work showed that the