Tom Jansen wrote:
>
> > > Attached now :-)
> >
> > OK, I hope to look at it today ... Thanks ...
>
> Be sure to grab the latest version because I added a few fixes:
> o Makefile quirk (stupid me)
> o libsmbclient.h fixup so programs including libsmbclient.h can compile
>
> http://niihau.st
David Collier-Brown wrote:
>
> Richard Sharpe wrote:
> > The problem I have here is that we do not seem to have asked our user base
> > what they want.
> >
> > I can appreciate the need for changes, as I need them myself, but
> > maintaining backward compatibility may be something that is importa
Urban Widmark wrote:
>
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Steven French wrote:
>
> > Good question - at some point I need to look at that. Clearly the
> > structure is quite a bit different between the two. Most visibly the mount
> ...
> > specification. Over time function between the two will probably
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Steven French wrote:
> FYI - The CIFS VFS handles large files and has been tested with RedHat 7.3
> version of the kernel. It was a pain to test due to the lack of sparse
> file support on the Linux side (I had not seen an equivalent to the sparse
> flag on the Linux side -
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Steven French wrote:
> Good question - at some point I need to look at that. Clearly the
> structure is quite a bit different between the two. Most visibly the mount
...
> specification. Over time function between the two will probably diverge
> quite a bit more.I wa
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 05:55:30PM +0200, Alain Defrance wrote:
> i wonder why i 've some process run by root and some by my users ?
> like this :
>
>0001177 12078 218 2 17:46:33 ?0:11 -d2 smbd
>root 1373 218 0 13:53:20 ?0:49 -d2 smbd
>root 6301 218 0 15:41
Hi!
I'll comment a problem expecting that someone will help me.
To solve the problem of not having trusted domains, we placed
smbpasswd into a nfs volume, which is mounted by 2 server. This solved
our initial problem with authentication and home shares without
complications. Because of the known
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-06-20 at 20:18, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Nir Soffer wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > I want to get winbind to work over TCP sockets instead of a UNIX domain
> > > socket (so I could run winbindd on one machine
On Thu, 2002-06-20 at 20:18, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Nir Soffer wrote:
>
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > I want to get winbind to work over TCP sockets instead of a UNIX domain
> > socket (so I could run winbindd on one machine and avoid running it on
> > several machines in a clus
Title: RE: --with-vfs and ACLs problem
Helpful info to answer Mr. Sharpe's questions:
To find the domain SID of any domain controller:
rpcclient //ip-or-netbios-name-of-domain-controller -U DOMAIN+Username%password -c lsaquery
To find the MACHINE SID of the Samba server:
FYI - The CIFS VFS handles large files and has been tested with RedHat 7.3
version of the kernel. It was a pain to test due to the lack of sparse
file support on the Linux side (I had not seen an equivalent to the sparse
flag on the Linux side - but it sure helps on the Windows side in creating
t
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Nir L wrote:
> The problem is, that my Client Workstations are displaying correct account names
>when looking for ACL's of files of all the NT servers in the DOMAIN. The Client has
>no problem with that. It has problem when trying to translate SID's of the DOMAIN
>that wer
Steven French wrote:
>
> Good question - at some point I need to look at that. Clearly the
> structure is quite a bit different between the two. Most visibly the mount
> code is in kernel in mine (I have no mount helper yet as smbfs does - I was
> planning on adding some tcp name to ip address
MS-DFS support is not complete - About three weeks ago I did a lot of
tracing/poking around there though especially in tracing level 3 referrals.
I negotiate the DFS capability/flag bits and have the necessary structures
but did not add the mount helper code to the "net" utility (or equivalent)
ye
Good question - at some point I need to look at that. Clearly the
structure is quite a bit different between the two. Most visibly the mount
code is in kernel in mine (I have no mount helper yet as smbfs does - I was
planning on adding some tcp name to ip address resolution code in the Samba
ut
I didn't make a tar ball of this particular version. It is all in CVS
though (minus some bug fixes for locking e.g. my lock lengths are one byte
too short and I don't report the mandatory locking capable mode for files).
I will make a tar ball of the source on Monday.
I was holding off on makin
Thanks. I'll give that a try.
>>> Urban Widmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06/20/02 02:34PM >>>
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Brett Simpson wrote:
> I'm trying to access a Windows 2000 server share that has files > 2GB
> using the Samba client 2.2.3 that comes with Redhat 7.3. It lists the
> files as being many
The problem is, that my Client Workstations are
displaying correct account names when looking for ACL's of files of all the NT
servers in the DOMAIN. The Client has no problem with that. It has problem when
trying to translate SID's of the DOMAIN that were created by Samba.
So - My guess is t
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 12:28:18PM -0500, Esh, Andrew wrote:
>
> Suggest the following fix:
>
> Index: winbindd_rpc.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvsroot/samba/source/nsswitch/winbindd_rpc.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.22.2.7
> diff -u -c -r
Richard Sharpe wrote:
> The problem I have here is that we do not seem to have asked our user base
> what they want.
>
> I can appreciate the need for changes, as I need them myself, but
> maintaining backward compatibility may be something that is important,
> given that libsmbclient is being sh
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Brett Simpson wrote:
> I'm trying to access a Windows 2000 server share that has files > 2GB
> using the Samba client 2.2.3 that comes with Redhat 7.3. It lists the
> files as being many times larger than their actual size. I upgraded to
> the CVS version of Samba today and i
Title: RE: Large file size issues with Samba client.
An 18.4 Exabyte realmedia file? Must be one of Jeremy Allison's ACL discussions.
That number is interesting. If you subtract it from 2^64, you get 1,932,534,103. If that number is added to the other reported file size (2,307,064*1024), the
I'm trying to access a Windows 2000 server share that has files > 2GB using the Samba
client 2.2.3 that comes with Redhat 7.3. It lists the files as being many times larger
than their actual size. I upgraded to the CVS version of Samba today and it still has
the problem. Any ideas on how to wor
> > Attached now :-)
>
> OK, I hope to look at it today ... Thanks ...
Be sure to grab the latest version because I added a few fixes:
o Makefile quirk (stupid me)
o libsmbclient.h fixup so programs including libsmbclient.h can compile
http://niihau.student.utwente.nl/~sketch/libsmbc2-1.d
Title: RE: Winbind problem or my problem:)
I am
assuming O. T. is not using ADS security.
O. T.
: Try rebooting the PDC. It's possible one of the services is not responding to
user info requests. The problem you are describing requires some very basic
parts of the code to fail, if it's on
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Nir L wrote:
>
> I am using samba 2.2.0 without winbind, using security = server.
> The samba server is NOT a PDC.
> I've set its password server to my PDC.
>
> I am writing an extention to samba, in order to let it get the ACL's of the shared
>files from an external secur
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Nir Soffer wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I want to get winbind to work over TCP sockets instead of a UNIX domain
> socket (so I could run winbindd on one machine and avoid running it on
> several machines in a cluster).
Hmmm, you know that security info goes over this connection
Hi.
I have followed the ADS-HOWTO.txt in trying to get smbd behind
kerberos authentication. The w2k kdc neatly distributes the ticket
for the smbd and i have made the accounts for smbd and mirage-host
in the w2k kdc.
NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE seems to be the core of the problem, meaning
that the
I am using samba 2.2.0 without winbind,
using security = server.
The samba server is NOT a PDC.
I've set its password server to my
PDC.
I am writing an extention to samba, in order to let
it get the ACL's of the shared files from an external security managment
product. The security managem
29 matches
Mail list logo
