On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 10:44:54AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
Anyway, if the unexpected.tdb is the reason that winbindd needs nmbd, then
I think it could be made optional. I imagine that winbindd would be
sending regular name queries in order to find the
Hi,
I have applied some fixed to get rid of warnings, plus it now plays nice
against NetApp, and you can now specify a path to add to all paths that
are sent to the server.
NetApp is the most picky filer I have seen. It demands share names of the
form \\server\share in a TconX, where Windows
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 22:14:17 +0530, root [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finally it has been working out the box. Now i am able to rsync the data more than
4GB files as well.
But during boot time i gets some error message of this kind.
#
/lib/ext3.o: unresolved symbol iget4_R7414451b
/lib/ext3.o:
Hi folks,
Short version:
--
Can anybody tell me if there are hooks in Samba that make it possible
to use it in conjunction with an apache module for HTTP-based
NTLM-authentication?
Long version:
-
Internet Explorer can authenticate against a Web-Server using the
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 10:44:54AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
Anyway, if the unexpected.tdb is the reason that winbindd needs nmbd, then
I think it could be made optional. I imagine that winbindd would
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Johann Hanne wrote:
Hi folks,
Short version:
--
Can anybody tell me if there are hooks in Samba that make it possible
to use it in conjunction with an apache module for HTTP-based
NTLM-authentication?
Long version:
-
Internet Explorer
These are for param/loadparm.c and utils/testparm.c, respectively,
to put in the self-checking that's been languishing...
After these go in, I'll start tracking smb.conf changes
again, so I can support them, any you can delete
samba-patches 298 (Self-check patches for 2.2.0 alpha 3,
11 Apr
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 04:47:17AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
The whole thing is based on the authentication used by any SMB client that
connects to a SMB server:
- The client connects to the server
- The server generates and sends some random bytes (challenge)
- The client sends a
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 04:47:17AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Short version:
--
Can anybody tell me if there are hooks in Samba that make it possible
to use it in conjunction with an apache module for HTTP-based
NTLM-authentication?
Long version:
-
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 07:44:24PM +0200, Johann Hanne wrote:
Short version:
--
Can anybody tell me if there are hooks in Samba that make it possible
to use it in conjunction with an apache module for HTTP-based
NTLM-authentication?
Yes, there are such hooks. You can look at
Hi all,
First off, apologies if this is the wrong forum or the
message is a repeat.
I have Samba set up to join a realm. Most of the time, my
Win2k client gets authenticated as follows:
1.
Client sends NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE
2.
Samba sends back NTLMSSP_CHALLENGE
3.
Client sends
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 04:21:47AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
:
We have to node status to get the *name* of the PDC, becouse the
NETLOGON RPC requires that. Windows machines to a NETLOGON Mailslot
message, but we don't do that at present.
So you join the domain without knowing
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Tim Potter wrote:
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 04:47:17AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
It's actually NTLMSSP base-64 encoded in http headers.
There has been much discussion about this on this list and on
#samba-technical and it may already be possible or close to
Possibly that Linux allows a user to be in a max of 32 groups?
Yes, this is the limit. Look in your kernel source at include/asm/param.h
for NGROUPS.
Jim McDonough
IBM Linux Technology Center
Samba Team
6 Minuteman Drive
Scarborough, ME 04074
USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 06:23:38AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Nope. There's a challenge sent by either the server and then the client
produces a LM and NT response which is a hash of the challenge and the
user's password. This is sent to the server (in this case winbindd) for
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 03:01:34PM -0500, Steven French wrote:
OS/2 had 16 bit errors - basically the ERRdos range (SMB error class) is
mostly error codes introduced in OS/2 development and could be just as
easily named ERRos2
The old X/Open doc says (in its description of availabel
I think I've got this figured, but someone let me know if'n I've got it
sidewards.
The server sends its Capabilities data in the NegProt respoinse, and then
the client replies with its Capabilities in the SESSION_SETUP_ANDX. The
two values are ANDed... and the result is the agreed upon
Attached is a patch against HEAD that provides the 'P' option for
acctFlags.
I havent been able to test this yet, so use with care.
Ideally, this would eventually set the user cannot change password bit
to the client, but as Andrew mentioned, this hasnt been fully implemented,
and I'm not
Patrick McCarty wrote:
Attached is a patch against HEAD that provides the 'P' option for
acctFlags.
Can you please verify that this is the correct bit to set? Rember, MS
defines them - so we should check. Ethereal should be able to show you.
I havent been able to test this yet, so use
19 matches
Mail list logo
