Yes, sorry, that's my error.
the debug level changed to address the debug classes.
Now it is a string parameter not an integer anymore so that you can
specify different log levels for any subclass.
like all:2 passdb:5 rpc:10
In the transition I forgot to change swat.
It's in my todo list!
I'll
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Corey Caverly wrote:
I have currently compiled SAMBA with the LDAP option and I SAMBA is as
of now authenticating with the LDAP server but I am looking to do two things
One... I do not want SAMBA to look on the localhost to access the user
list. In other words I
Hey Andrew,
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 12:56:04 -0500
Andrew Theurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
great stuff. As you can think, I have never got the chance to run real
netbench-runs. So I am not very familiar with interpreting the results
Could you publish more data, like the plot throughput against
ok. just a quick reply to this. I do appreciate the prompt replies to my
last mail, at least someone does seem interested in this stuff, so I will
continue. I'll report back on the deep secrets of the perverted minds of MS
here. I hope to continue with this tomorrow evening (EET). by that time
To make a long story short, cross-domain and cross-subnet browsing will not
work with samba. especially if domains are limited to one subnet. That's it.
If anyone is willing/capable of helping me with this, I'd be grateful.
However since my original mail received no responses at all,
On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 09:58, Aleksandr Koltsoff wrote:
ok. just a quick reply to this. I do appreciate the prompt replies to my
last mail, at least someone does seem interested in this stuff, so I will
continue. I'll report back on the deep secrets of the perverted minds of MS
here. I hope to
Hi, Matt!
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 12:03:26PM -0700, ZINKEVICIUS,MATT (HP-Loveland,ex1) wrote:
access. So order is very important. However, does it accumulate perms.
It accumulates and continues as long as none of the request bits have
been denied. If there are no more ACEs and the full set
Hello!
I just noticed 2 problems when using Visual Studio 6 to edit files located
on a Samba share.
1. This file has been modified outside of the source editor.
To reproduce: Create a C++ file and save it on the share. Type some text,
within a couple of seconds it will pop up a message box
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Aleksandr Koltsoff wrote:
ok. just a quick reply to this. I do appreciate the prompt replies to my
last mail, at least someone does seem interested in this stuff, so I will
continue. I'll report back on the deep secrets of the perverted minds of MS
here. I hope to
Richard Sharpe wrote:
Hi,
I looked at this issue, and it looks possible to accumulate the timeouts
that have occured in receive_message_or_smb and count those up.
Given that the resolution of the dead time parameter is in minutes, this
would seem to not get too far out of whack.
This sounds like you have clocks out of sync. Be sure that the time on
your workstation, the Samba server, and any NFS servers that Samba may
get shares from all have clocks that are in sync. I highly suggest
using NTP between all servers. Once you have NTP running on a unix
server, you can
Mike Gerdts wrote:
net time /setsntp:unixservername
I think I've been having this problem too -- thanks!
Do I need to put that command in a profile so that it's executed at each
logon, or can I run the command once only (on each workstation) ... ?
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Steven Mackenzie wrote:
Mike Gerdts wrote:
net time /setsntp:unixservername
I think I've been having this problem too -- thanks!
Do I need to put that command in a profile so that it's executed at each
logon, or can I run the command once only (on each
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
As a basic rule, setting 'deadtime' is a bad idea. Is there any reason
to set this paramater?
Once upon a time our servers got pretty bogged down during daytime,
deadtime and other quick fixes helped alleviate this.
With all the hardware upgrades
Mathew McKernan wrote:
Hi Fredrik,
This problem has been found with any server. Whether it be Samba or 2k or
NT. I have had this problem with a NT server, as we didn't have a NTP server
at the time, I used net time \\server /set /yes in the logon script. Made
life a lot easier. I use the
As others have said, this is a time syncronization issue which is not
Samba specific.
When the file is saved to the server, the timestamp put on the file is
the Server's time. Assume for a moment that the server time is ahead
of the workstation time.
Visual basic will periodically check the
Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Richard Sharpe wrote:
Hi,
I looked at this issue, and it looks possible to accumulate
the timeouts that have occured in receive_message_or_smb and
count those up.
Given that the resolution of the dead time parameter is in
Good morning!
When I changing openssl library in redhat 7.3 from version 0.9.6b-18 to
0.9.6b-24
module pam_smbpass has problems:
Aug 1 13:07:23 portraits sshd[1082]: PAM unable to
dlopen(/lib/security/pam_ldap.so)
Aug 1 13:07:23 portraits sshd[1082]: PAM [dlerror: /lib/libssl.so.2:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 04:22:17PM +0200, Bartlomiej Solarz-Niesluchowski wrote:
Good morning!
When I changing openssl library in redhat 7.3 from version 0.9.6b-18 to
0.9.6b-24
module pam_smbpass has problems:
Aug 1 13:07:23 portraits sshd[1082]: PAM unable to
Dear Samba Users
I tried pwdump to extract username from win2k, later when i replaced it
smbpasswd directly,
now when i am trying to login thru windows 2000 pro workstation, i am
getting the following error
[2002/08/01 19:40:03, 0] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(890)
restrict anonymous
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, san wrote:
Dear Samba Users
I tried pwdump to extract username from win2k, later when i replaced it
smbpasswd directly,
now when i am trying to login thru windows 2000 pro workstation, i am
getting the following error
[2002/08/01 19:40:03, 0]
Jim Myers wrote:
Andrew, you mentioned that Samba should produce the same error codes
as a Windows remote share.
Here's an interesting case: The test below runs correctly on native
NTFS, but fails as shown below with a remote Win2K share.
Samba produces the same error code as the remote
Pardon my skepticism, but is there any evidence that calling gettimeofday
from this location in the code is actually contributing in any material
way
to the performance of Samba? Any measurements?
Yes, Andrew Theurer had done profiling of various netbench runs and
gettimeofday was one of the
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, ZINKEVICIUS,MATT (HP-Loveland,ex1) wrote:
1. If it encounters a DENY (negative) ACE that denies any of the bits
requested, it denies access.
Correct
2. If it encounters ALLOW ACLs that allows any of the bits,
but not all,
it continues? Is this true. Does it
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Andrew Theurer wrote:
I though I'd share some NetBench results on one of our servers.
[snip]
Results:
Baseline 576 Mbps
ext3 data=writeback 623 Mbps
samba smblog=1673 Mbps
sendfile/zerocopy
Andrew Theurer wrote:
Some other things I think may be worth investigating:
gettimeofday(). Samba calls this a lot, one for every reply I think, to check
for connection timeout. This means we go into kernel mode every single time
we call this, something I'd like to avoid. And I also don't
Andrew Theurer wrote:
Hyperthreading. With 2 physical processors, I can get 25% better results!!!
with 4 physical processors, I only get 2% better. I may be running into
other bottlenecks on the 4 physical/8 logical CPU case, so I hope there is
room for improvement. However there are
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Green, Paul wrote:
Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Richard Sharpe wrote:
Hi,
I looked at this issue, and it looks possible to accumulate
the timeouts that have occured in receive_message_or_smb and
count those up.
Given that
On Thursday 01 August 2002 8:10 am, Green, Paul wrote:
Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Richard Sharpe wrote:
Hi,
I looked at this issue, and it looks possible to accumulate
the timeouts that have occured in receive_message_or_smb and
count those up.
Given
Title: RE: Eliminating gettimeofday from construct_reply
In the Samba profile results, the last column is the total time spent within the named routine, since profiling was started. Divide by the number of calls to get the average time per call.
-Original Message-
From: Green, Paul
From man readprofile:
The readprofile command uses the /proc/profile information to print
ascii data on standard output. The output is organized in three
columns: the first is the number of clock ticks, the second is the name
of the C function in the kernel where those many
OK,
Here is some profiling data from Samba. I profiled around each of the
GetTimeOfDay calls in construct_reply. So, it does not count all
gettimeofday calls. I was more interested in the fastpath.
I then ran a test that read a single 50MB file from the server. The file
would pretty much be
Hi,
I just ran into a problem with a Win2K machine where if multiple
connections occur on port 445, when the first one issues a NegProt, the
rest get a reset.
It is compounded by the fact that the server does not want to accept
sessions on port 139 (that is, the NetBIOS session requests are
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 04:33:33AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Hi,
I just ran into a problem with a Win2K machine where if multiple
connections occur on port 445, when the first one issues a NegProt, the
rest get a reset.
Is it the NegProt or the SessionSetup? If the VC number in the
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 04:33:33AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Hi,
I just ran into a problem with a Win2K machine where if multiple
connections occur on port 445, when the first one issues a NegProt, the
rest get a reset.
Is it
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 04:49:55AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
:
It's the NegProt. Once the first NegProt is issued on any open TCP
connection, all the others get RSTs if they have not got past that point.
It is bizare. They come from another planet, I tell you.
Odd. Are these all
David Collier-Brown wrote:
Andrew Theurer wrote:
Hyperthreading. With 2 physical processors, I can get 25% better results!!!
with 4 physical processors, I only get 2% better. I may be running into
other bottlenecks on the 4 physical/8 logical CPU case, so I hope there is
room for
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 04:49:55AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
:
It's the NegProt. Once the first NegProt is issued on any open TCP
connection, all the others get RSTs if they have not got past that point.
It is bizare. They come from
Andrew Theurer wrote:
One other thing, P4 by default sends all ints to CPU0. This _was_ a
problem for 4 physical/8 logical processors. A single physical
processor is enough to handle all the ints from these network cards at
the throughput we are seeing. However, when you split the physical
Hello,
We are converting our Samba setup from using System V style printing to
CUPS and it is working brilliantly.
The only issue I have found is that all the temporary Samba spool files
(smbprn.*) remain in the spool directory after printing. They are not
deleted like they were under System V
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 05:12:41AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 04:49:55AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
:
It's the NegProt. Once the first NegProt is issued on any open TCP
connection, all the others get RSTs if
am just curious why its going for port 445 ?
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sharpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 2:20 PM
To: Christopher R. Hertel
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Win2K resetting connections. Is there a service pack?
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002,
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
am just curious why its going for port 445 ?
NetBIOS-less SMB.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Richard Sharpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
H, the MSDN article I looked at did not say that, but
does not address
that situation either. It kind of implies that any deny bit
in the set
requested causes a deny.
There used to be an MSDN article on Computing Effective Rights but
I'm trying to get domain group mapping to work on my test domain
(today's HEAD) but when I query the domain controller from an XP client
for groups i get no results.
So i thought i'd try rpcclient to do a enumdomgroups -
NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL (see below)
smbgroupedit shows a bunch of groups.
I
the HEAD code seems to have reverted to automagic
machine account creation... I thought that was disabled - thus the
addition of the add machine script parameter.
I think I like the automagic add better but we can only have one...
if i put a valid script like this in smb.conf
add machine script
Richard Sharpe wrote:
Hi,
I just ran into a problem with a Win2K machine where if multiple
connections occur on port 445, when the first one issues a NegProt, the
rest get a reset.
Yes, they get reset if they have not yet issued a SessionSetup.
It is compounded by the fact that the
Hi,
Are all these things strictly local decisions or are they now all encoded
in groups, or are there some capability bits associated with users?
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It appears that pam_smbpass is once again broken in HEAD, due to
unresolved symbols. The attached diff attempts a somewhat more permanent
solution to the problem.
Cheers,
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
Index: Makefile.in
Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
Hi
Am attaching the log here, i reaaly appreciate your time on this.
just as an example couple of folder that are not seen by explorer for this
user:
public_html, G15_PSOs
files: w17_test_status.pdf
Ok, the server is returning all of public_html, G15_PSOs
Abdul Javid {AJAVID1} wrote:
I am trying to find why some files and directories are not visible
from W2K windows explorers though they exist on unix home directory
permissions are fine ( 755 )on unix side
following is the portion of log ( level 10 )
[2002/07/31 16:16:05, 8]
I really appreciate all your responses on this.
I might not have fixed it by looking at samba logs but i noticed there was
directory in user unix directory with wildcard * as folder name
once i removed it, samba showed up all the files and directory.
am not sure what would * as folder name
Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
I really appreciate all your responses on this.
I might not have fixed it by looking at samba logs but i noticed there was
directory in user unix directory with wildcard * as folder name
Thank you, kind sir!
Now, I'll do a quick test on my
53 matches
Mail list logo
