Volker Lendecke schrieb:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 01:19:18PM +0200, Martin Bahlinger wrote:
I discovered that when the network reports No route to host (tested
with route add DC_IP reject) everything works fine. But when I get the
error Operation already in progress (tested with route add
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 10:02:49PM -0400, Allen, Michael B (RSCH) wrote:
Clients should not check for *two* zero bytes after the Primary Domain field Unicode
string
in SMB_COM_SESSION_SETUP_ANDX. You may only get *one* 0x00 byte. I'm almost
glad this is a bug in Win2K, I thought this was a
I'll send it to the list this time..
Samba Head seems to send two identical copies of the NTLMSSP blob in a
session setup response when more processing is required.
Does Win2K do this?
Yep, that's why we do it. Take a look at Craig Russ' presentation from
CIFS 2000:
Hello all,
I'm using the smbclient program to connect to a
share on a local/member win2k pro system of a win2k
domain. I've done the following:
Create user:test pass:testtest
login: works
Create user:123456 Pass:123456
login: fails
I've tried this on three different systems so far and
it
I read that you are planning a 2.2.6 release of Samba. Would it
be possible for you to apply the following short patches to
samba/source/profile/profile.c and samba/source/utils/status.c
in the 2.2 branch ??
These are precisely the same patches that you just applied at my
request in Samba
On Sun, 25 Aug 2002, Richard Sharpe wrote:
OK, guys, what is the significance of port name?
It gets displayed on the client :-)
cheers, jerry
-
Hewlett-Packard http://www.hp.com
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Gerald Carter wrote:
On Sun, 25 Aug 2002, Richard Sharpe wrote:
OK, guys, what is the significance of port name?
It gets displayed on the client :-)
Well, I exited with a value of Done, but that did not get displayed on the
client?
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe,
On Sat, 24 Aug 2002, A Kulu wrote:
Hi ,
I have the following queries.
1. I was looking at w2K - w2k traces. The tree connect And X
always happens only for a validated user. This implies that
a user should have done a SSX before t con X.
Does samba follow the same philosophy
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:24:09 +
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 10:02:49PM -0400, Allen, Michael B (RSCH) wrote:
Clients should not check for *two* zero bytes after the Primary Domain field
Unicode string
in SMB_COM_SESSION_SETUP_ANDX. You
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Michael B. Allen wrote:
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:24:09 +
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 10:02:49PM -0400, Allen, Michael B (RSCH) wrote:
Clients should not check for *two* zero bytes after the Primary Domain field
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 11:20:00AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I read that you are planning a 2.2.6 release of Samba. Would it
be possible for you to apply the following short patches to
samba/source/profile/profile.c and samba/source/utils/status.c
in the 2.2 branch ??
Ok - will do -
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 11:20:00AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I read that you are planning a 2.2.6 release of Samba. Would it
be possible for you to apply the following short patches to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:49:27AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 11:20:00AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I read that you are planning a 2.2.6 release of Samba. Would it
be possible for you to apply
OK, I think this is the fix to restore the desired behavior with
respect to syslog.h. configure (both 2.2.5 and 3.0) is already
looking for a header named syslog.h, so it is a simple matter to
base the decision upon the right macro. Sorry for the mixup.
Will be harmless here; we don't have
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 02:51:52PM -0400, Michael B. Allen wrote:
who do i send the bill to for my time?
Microsoft Corp.
PO Box 9876542-1
Redmond, WA 87654-321
teehee. that'll do nicely :)
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 05:58:19AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Ummm, since SMBs are little endian, 00 58 is a large BCC. Much larger that
0x58.
1) rubbish.
encapsulated packets - and SMB is used as a transport for many
different things (other transports; at least two different
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sharpe [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 4:28 PM
To: Michael B. Allen
Cc: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [jcifs] Re: Win2K: Primary Domain Fld of Ssn
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Allen, Michael B (RSCH) wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sharpe [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 4:28 PM
To: Michael B. Allen
Cc: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sharpe [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:25 PM
To: Allen, Michael B (RSCH)
Cc: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [jcifs] Re: Win2K: Primary Domain Fld
It looks like the recent changes to 'correct' NTLMSSP have broken NTLMv2
in some way - Probably in much the same way that we suddenly got LM
based session keys once we got the rest correct.
In particular, it seems that the feilds in the NTLMSSP challange packet
may have been re-ordered (Netbios
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Allen, Michael B (RSCH) wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sharpe [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 8:25 PM
To: Allen, Michael B (RSCH)
Cc: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL
Am I right in thinking that SPNEGO allows for multiple authentication
types by including multiple OIDs, for example KRB5, NTLMSSP, NTLM, etc?
Yes, for example the following OIDs are included in a DCE RPC SPNEGO
authentication:
24 069: OBJECT IDENTIFIER '1 2 840 48018 1 2 2'
22 matches
Mail list logo
