On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Kevin Liao wrote:
Thanks for your reply. How about to disable the local kernel cache if the
local system is running in the RAM disk so that we may have more memory to
use and no need to worry about all of this?
The local system isn't running in any ram disk when using
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Kevin Liao wrote:
So when fsync() returns, it just means:
1. The remote server has successfully received the SMBflush request but not
proceeded it yet.
or
2. The remote server has successfully received and done the SMBflush
request.
When fsync returns (2) has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As you requested:
Sorry to bother you again, but would a tcpdump be possible:
tcpdump -i eth0 -n -s 1600 -w pdc.out host 172.21.63.142.
The logfile is quite weird. First you can connect:
[2002/08/29 15:11:42, 3, pid=12863]
Urban Widmark wrote:
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Kevin Liao wrote:
So when fsync() returns, it just means:
1. The remote server has successfully received the SMBflush request but not
proceeded it yet.
or
2. The remote server has successfully received and done the SMBflush
request.
The local system isn't running in any ram disk when using smbfs. Even if
you connect to a localhost samba server, that is a remote system as far as
smbfs is concerned.
I'm not sure I understood you here.
/Urban
Sorry I didn't mention it clearly. The local machine does not have any hard
Hi,
attached a nano patch to include tdbdump into the samba distribution. We
think this tool should be widely available for debugging purposes.
Cheers
Olaf
begin 644 smb-tdbdump.diff.gz
M'XL(`QQ;#T``W-M8BUT9)D=6UP+F1I9F8`[5-;;YLP'UN?H6KY:YP(F
But why do you want to use CIFS for a linux to linux file sharing ???
Wait at least until the Unix extension are ok and work well ...
On Fri, 2002-08-30 at 13:05, Kevin Liao wrote:
The local system isn't running in any ram disk when using smbfs. Even if
you connect to a localhost samba
Hello,
I have been searching for answers now more then a
week, but I cannot find a proper solution.
Please help me with this:
Scenario:
Two differnet subnetted networks (1 and
2)connected by a cipe tunnel between two linux Samba boxes over the
internet.
On network one (1) is a Windows NT
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Kevin Liao wrote:
called an embedded system. Anyway the local machine will try to smbmount to
the remote machine which is just a normal PC with linux installed. After the
connection has been established successfully, the local system begins
writing files continuously to
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Michael Cuff wrote:
Ok, I see what's happening.
I'm glad someone does :)
Client - Linux 2.4.7 based, smbmount version 2.2.1a
I didn't think 2.2.1 sent share names as unicode strings. Or is this with
some modified samba? ISTR some japanese patches ...
/Urban
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 02:52:29PM -0700, Michael Cuff wrote:
Ok, I see what's happening.
The string goes from utf-8 to codepage. The length of the codepage
string is shoved into the cli struct. Then the string is converted to
unicode. The resulting string is shorter than the length
Tim,
How about keeping basically the same API in namecache.c (i.e expiry
based on time_t) but with an appropriate key prefix as you suggest?
What I'd like to see is a lib/gencache.c module that provides a string
based cache. So all cache entries would have string keys and string
values.
key:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim,
How about keeping basically the same API in namecache.c (i.e expiry
based on time_t) but with an appropriate key prefix as you suggest?
What I'd like to see is a lib/gencache.c module that provides a string
based cache. So all cache entries would have
13 matches
Mail list logo
