Ethereal now handles KRB5 pretty much in SPNEGO requests/responses

2002-09-06 Thread Richard Sharpe
Hi, Well, it turns out that Wes Hardaker did a pretty good job of the Kerberos 5 dissector. It took me about 10 minutes after I sat down and looked at the issue, and I had it modified so I can call dissect_kerberos_main from other dissectors. It seems like AP_REQ might not be dissected full

Re: Maximum number of mounts ?

2002-09-06 Thread Simo Sorce
I think you are mounting against a workstation. Keep in mind microsoft permit only 10 concurrent access to their workstation OS, if you need more you must buy a server OS and licenses if you have more than 5 clients. Simo. On Sat, 2002-09-07 at 01:54, root wrote: > > > I'm currently using Sam

Re: trusted domains patch n+3

2002-09-06 Thread Andrew Bartlett
Simo Sorce wrote: > > Ok, that was clear, what I want to ask, is: why should we try to logon a > user that provides bad information? Shouldn't we simply deny it with an > error? How do NT behaves in such situations? We match NT, as far as I know. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett

Re: trusted domains patch n+3

2002-09-06 Thread Simo Sorce
Ok, that was clear, what I want to ask, is: why should we try to logon a user that provides bad information? Shouldn't we simply deny it with an error? How do NT behaves in such situations? Simo. On Sat, 2002-09-07 at 00:42, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > Rafal Szczesniak wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 0

Maximum number of mounts ?

2002-09-06 Thread root
I'm currently using Samba 2.2.5-pre1 on a Mandrake 8.1 system with kernel 2.4.19-8. I need to mount 15 remote filesystems. I can manage 9. Is there some kind of configuration option I need to set, or have I found a bug? It _almost_ works.   On 3 of the mounts during linux boot, I get the e

Re: trusted domains patch n+3

2002-09-06 Thread Andrew Bartlett
Rafal Szczesniak wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 05:01:25PM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 16:37, Rafal Szczesniak wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 04:42:53PM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > > > > > > What are you trying to do there? > > > > Why should we replace a domai

samba225 fails to create "new folder" on solaris 2.6

2002-09-06 Thread Watson, Karen
We have recently upgraded to samba 225 and the shares are on a solaris 2.6 box. When a windows 2000 client attempts to create a "new folder" from explorer the following error message is displayed. "Unable to create the folder "New Folder" The system cannot find the file specified. We previousl

Updated utils/net_cache.c

2002-09-06 Thread Rafal Szczesniak
Updated version has two implementations of parse_timeout() function: for systems supporting POSIX regular expressions and for system lacking this. This takes portability issue off our heads. Non-regex version doesn't look very pretty, but it works (at least in my tests). I'll send patch adding sho

Re: trusted domains patch n+3

2002-09-06 Thread Rafal Szczesniak
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 05:01:25PM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 16:37, Rafal Szczesniak wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 04:42:53PM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > > > > What are you trying to do there? > > > Why should we replace a domain name with another??? > > > > For in

Re: trusted domains patch n+3

2002-09-06 Thread Simo Sorce
On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 16:37, Rafal Szczesniak wrote: > On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 04:42:53PM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 15:56, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > > One is the username they wanted, the other is the username they got > > > (after the username map file). Similarly for d

Re: trusted domains patch n+3

2002-09-06 Thread Rafal Szczesniak
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 04:42:53PM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 15:56, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > One is the username they wanted, the other is the username they got > > (after the username map file). Similarly for domains - if the domain > > they wanted is trusted, and we are

Re: trusted domains patch n+3

2002-09-06 Thread Simo Sorce
On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 15:56, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > One is the username they wanted, the other is the username they got > (after the username map file). Similarly for domains - if the domain > they wanted is trusted, and we are not allowing trusted domains, or if > the domain doesn't exist, the

Re: trusted domains patch n+3

2002-09-06 Thread Rafal Szczesniak
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 11:56:46PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > Rafal Szczesniak wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 11:39:52PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > > Rafal Szczesniak wrote: > > > > > > > > This is a patch consisting of various fixes. Short list > > > > includes: > > > > - us

Re: trusted domains patch n+3

2002-09-06 Thread Andrew Bartlett
Rafal Szczesniak wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 11:39:52PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > Rafal Szczesniak wrote: > > > > > > This is a patch consisting of various fixes. Short list > > > includes: > > > - using user_info.client_domain structure (from user supplied auth info) > > >ins

Re: trusted domains patch n+3

2002-09-06 Thread Rafal Szczesniak
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 11:39:52PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > Rafal Szczesniak wrote: > > > > This is a patch consisting of various fixes. Short list > > includes: > > - using user_info.client_domain structure (from user supplied auth info) > >instead of user_info.domain > > This just

Re: initial gencache implementation

2002-09-06 Thread Andrew Bartlett
Rafal Szczesniak wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 10:17:19AM +1000, Tim Potter wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 12:15:36PM +0200, Rafal Szczesniak wrote: > > > > > This is first implementation of caching mechanism. It includes > > > both lib/gencache.c code and utils/net_cache.c as command-li

Re: trusted domains patch n+3

2002-09-06 Thread Andrew Bartlett
Rafal Szczesniak wrote: > > This is a patch consisting of various fixes. Short list > includes: > - using user_info.client_domain structure (from user supplied auth info) >instead of user_info.domain This just is not correct. Current behaviour is by design > - new (and soon completely re

Re: initial gencache implementation

2002-09-06 Thread Rafal Szczesniak
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 10:17:19AM +1000, Tim Potter wrote: > On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 12:15:36PM +0200, Rafal Szczesniak wrote: > > > This is first implementation of caching mechanism. It includes > > both lib/gencache.c code and utils/net_cache.c as command-line > > control/testing tool. > > >

RE: RE: Pb make samba 2.2.5 with snprintf on HPUX11

2002-09-06 Thread patrick . girard
Hi Don, Thanks for your answer. I have installed gcc 2.95.3 and now it's working. Bye Patrick -Message d'origine- De : don.mccall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Envoyé : vendredi 6 septembre 2002 12:58 À : don.mccall; patrick.girard; samba-technical Objet : RE: Pb make samba 2.2.5 with snpr

RE: Pb make samba 2.2.5 with snprintf on HPUX11

2002-09-06 Thread MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)
Hi Patrick, Problem is that the header file stdio.h on HP-UX 11 had a bad declaration for snprintf() (doesn't match the standard OR the man page). HP is planning on fixing this in a future release, but for now, if you are using gcc, you'll need to edit the stdio.h that gcc is using so that the

Re: recycle.c (was block.c)

2002-09-06 Thread Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
Hi Jürgen, Alexander, the current vfs_recycle.c looks very nice! but here is a patch to vfs_recycle.c to use its own debug class it now depend on a patch to add DBGC_VFS... but abartlet is going to apply it:-) metze

[PATCH] ads.h ...v3

2002-09-06 Thread Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
Hi, here's a patch witch add a lot more UF flags for userAccountControl add details flags for sAMAccountType and groupType and make it possible to hold NT_STATUS codes inside of ADS_STATUS I use this for my new sam_ads module :-) It depends on a change abartlet want to do ( include some parts

[PATCH] DBGC_VFS

2002-09-06 Thread Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
Hi Andrew here's the patch witch adds DBGC_VFS metze - Stefan "metze" Metzmacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -Npur --exclude=CVS --exclude=*.bak --exclude=*.o --exclude=.#* HEAD/source/include/debug.h HEAD-fix/source/incl

Re: [PATCH] group control bits ....

2002-09-06 Thread Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
> > > > > -NTSTATUS sam_skel_get_groups_of_account(const struct sam_methods >*sam_method, const SAM_ACCOUNT_HANDLE *account, const uint32 type, uint32 >*group_count, SAM_GROUP_ENUM **groups) > > +NTSTATUS sam_skel_get_groups_of_sid(const struct sam_methods *sam_method, >const NT_USER_TOKEN *acces

Re: System documentation of Samba

2002-09-06 Thread Volker Lendecke
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 01:02:17PM -0400, David Collier-Brown wrote: > It doesn't affect the performance of Samba on > Solaris in general, and oddly enough it doesn't > seem to hit MS Access... Sorry, David, but that description is not completely correct. The Solaris fcntl scal