-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OK, the really nasty bit about this is the implict mapping of existing
unix accounts to rids. I went to a lot of effor to try and get rid of
it - but the best I could do was hide it under a pile of interfaces and
pretend it wasn't there ;-)
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 09:14:39PM +0200, Jean Francois Micouleau wrote:
and tdbsam should be the default passdb backend in 3.0. We should remove
the smbpasswd file and provide a migration script.
Oh, this is radical. But it would make a *LOT* of stuff easier. Not sure if I
really like that. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OK, the really nasty bit about this is the implict mapping of existing
unix accounts to rids. I went to a lot of effor to try and get rid of
it - but the best I could do was hide it under a pile of interfaces and
Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 09:14:39PM +0200, Jean Francois Micouleau wrote:
and tdbsam should be the default passdb backend in 3.0. We should remove
the smbpasswd file and provide a migration script.
Oh, this is radical. But it would make a *LOT* of stuff easier. Not
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 05:29:32PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
We actually have all this already. Jelmer has an XML passdb backend,
and pdbedit -i and -e do the rest.
So samba finally becomes buzzword-compliant :-)
We should then better not have XML in the examples subdirectory.
Volker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
pdb_smbpasswd and pdb_unixsam both use the code in passdb.c
(pdb_fill_sam_pw()) to construct their SAM_ACCOUNT, and to do uid-sid
mapping. In fact, becouse of this, smbpasswd already uses the gid code
to determine the primary group RID on the
At 18:27 26.09.2002 +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
Hi all!
What kind of a value is the acct_ctrl argument of
context_sam_enum_accounts supposed to be?
It should be possible to list all accounts, that's why the current
implementation isn't very usable...
list all accounts withacct_ctrl =
On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 03:53, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
I honestly doubt tdbsam is sufficiently stable for use as a default. I
think we need that kind of backend, but given it's extremly limited
testing, it worries me. Yes, this is circular dependency.
I haven't had an extensive test setup
Simo Sorce wrote:
And in my honest opinion we should get out the possibility to have
multiple backends active at the same time, I really think that move has
put us back 6 months in development and has caused more problems than
what the pros get with such a monster.
I still don't see where
It seem easy, but that prevented (at least in my case) to make the
system better.
The way we use multiple module in passdb is subtly broken and exposes us
to inconsistency and a lot of races.
and is not nice to have races in the users database.
the sam initially made a sane route and we also
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 10:16:28AM +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote about 'Re:
acct_ctrl in context_sam_enum_accounts':
At 18:27 26.09.2002 +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
Hi all!
What kind of a value is the acct_ctrl argument of
context_sam_enum_accounts supposed to be?
It should be
Hi again.
My faux pas; I used the HEAD branch, which was not correct. So I tried
the 3_0 branch and it has compiled successfully as it should... The
documentation on the web site regarding CVS did not list the 3_0 branch
;~{
--
James Bowes,
Senior Systems Consultant, Xisit
Ph: 604-535-6508
Here's a link to the patch that aliguori wrote and I cleaned up to respond
to the connectionless ldap v3 requests for netlogon info.
http://www-124.ibm.com/developer/opensource/linux/patches/?patch_id=540
I'm not so sure this belongs in nmbd, because once we respond to these,
win2k clients send
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 08:08:59AM -0700, James Bowes wrote about 'CVS update for
alpha release - update':
Hi again.
My faux pas; I used the HEAD branch, which was not correct.
What wasn't correct about it ?
Jelmer
Hello everyone,
Following the discussions on this list, I am getting a little confused now.
Which configure string do I have to use when I want to setup Samba on a
RedHat 7.0 system with ldap?
What I have done so far is:
Downloaded samba from cvs.
,/configure --sbindir=/usr/local/samba/bin
Anyone experience when the key hide unreadable = yes, where
the user goes to create a directory and it prompts with
(you may not be able to access the files created in \\server\share) do you want to continue.
I am using Windows 2000 Sp3, when I create a file it does
not do this. There
Quick comments:
s/objectSID/domainSid/ -- the netlogon attribute does not conform
to the the Active Directory schema.
Also, LDAP attributes are case-insensitive; don't use memcmp().
-- Luke
From: Jim McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: nmbd cldap patch
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 27
17 matches
Mail list logo
