¬°¦ó¥L¦b¦b¨â¦~¤º±q¤E¤G¤@¨ü¨a¤áÅܦ¨¤ë¤J¤­¤Q¸U?????

2002-10-22 Thread real
Title: ¤@­Ó­È±o¤F¸Ñªº¨Æ·~ ³o¬O©e°U¥Ñ±M·~¼s§i¤½¥q¥Nµo¤Åª½±µ¦^«HµLªk±µ¦¬ Ëç ~ ! ¡@

SMBClient - Messenger service

2002-10-22 Thread Nuno Cardoso
Hi. When I use "net send ..." command in windows to send a Winpopup message to other host, theSMB Command associate to this message is single block message (0xD0). To do this, it is only necessary sends oneSMB "frame" to theother host. When I use SMBClient(samba), the SMB Commandassociate

Re: CVS update: samba/packaging/RedHat

2002-10-22 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 samba2.spec.tmpl shouldn't this move to samba3.spec.tmpl Details, Details, Details, . Eventually i will rename it, but just getting it working was the first

Re: SMBClient - Messenger service

2002-10-22 Thread David Lee
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Nuno Cardoso wrote: When I use net send ... command in windows to send a Winpopup message to other host, the SMB Command associate to this message is single block message (0xD0). To do this, it is only necessary sends one SMB frame to the other host. When I use

Re: SMBClient - Messenger service

2002-10-22 Thread Simo Sorce
We are always interested in things that add functionality into samba. If you wish to send some patches we can look at, you are welcome. Simo. On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 16:56, David Lee wrote: Why SMBClient sends winpopup messages with multi-block message, and not single block message Where I

Re: SMBClient - Messenger service

2002-10-22 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 03:56:31PM +0100, David Lee wrote: : The single-frame version can only send a short message (less than 128 bytes), whereas the multi-frame version allows up to 1600 bytes total. See the description of the File Sharing Protocol. (Use Google to search for INTEL Part

Domain users listing - speed

2002-10-22 Thread Michael Smirnov
I have about 700 users in smbpasswd. When I view properties of a file from Win2000, after Security - Add - I see the list of all users in the domain. However, the scrollbar scrolls about 30 seconds, before all users are shown in the list! Slow! Is there a way to speed it up? Samba 2.2.5, FreeBSD

Re: libsmbclient fails after some time

2002-10-22 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
Just curious... If you are using Java why are you using libsmbclient instead of jCIFS? Is there some functionality in libsmbclient that is missing from the jCIFS client? Chris -)- On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 10:27:10AM +0530, Abhijeet Paturkar wrote: Hi, I am using libsmbclient on Linux

Re: SMBClient - Messenger service

2002-10-22 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:13:34AM -0500, Christopher R. Hertel wrote: : Oh, by the way, I'm getting SEGV when I try to test this using smbclient from 2.2.6. Anyone else see this? Skip that. I cleaned up my build environment, removed config.cache and proto.h, rebuilt things, and the problem

Printing with Samba and Intel Inbusiness printstation?

2002-10-22 Thread Eddie Lania
Hello folks, Regarding the story below, has there ever been done some effort to acomplish this? We use several of these so called windows print stations at work, but whatever I have tried with samba, cups, etc, I can't get it to work. Perhaps this is an issue that has allready been solved in the

Re: Domain users listing - speed

2002-10-22 Thread jra
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 08:43:52PM +0400, Michael Smirnov wrote: I have about 700 users in smbpasswd. When I view properties of a file from Win2000, after Security - Add - I see the list of all users in the domain. However, the scrollbar scrolls about 30 seconds, before all users are shown

Re: Printing with Samba and Intel Inbusiness printstation?

2002-10-22 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
It would be interesting to see the Negotiate Protocol exchange. It sounds as though the print station is using an older dialect. Chris -)- On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 08:00:42PM +0200, Eddie Lania wrote: Hello folks, Regarding the story below, has there ever been done some effort to

Re: Printing with Samba and Intel Inbusiness printstation?

2002-10-22 Thread Eddie Lania
That's propably why Intel has stopped there support on this product :-))) But hey, who can blame them since Microsoft invented NT (Neanderthaler Technology). Eddie. - Original Message - From: Christopher R. Hertel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Eddie Lania [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: libsmbclient fails after some time

2002-10-22 Thread Richard Sharpe
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Abhijeet Paturkar wrote: Hi, I am using libsmbclient on Linux Red Hat 7.2 We have developed C++ wrapper around libsmbclient 2.2.5. This wrapper is integrated with Java using JNI. And this Java class is used in Application server in JSP The stat for libsmbclient works

idmap api

2002-10-22 Thread Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
Hi, here's a proposal for the idmap api; we'll have a cache that will be asked first, if this fails we ask the central idmap and add the result to our cache. the idmap_central_* functions should be plugable/selectable (different backends should be allowed here) and the backend should decide

Re: Coming round to SURS...

2002-10-22 Thread jra
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 06:02:35PM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: i have a question for the people who sponsor the samba team. Rantings and dribble deleted i'm specifically referring to you - andrew - and you - jeremy. here's a proposal for the idmap api; I take it by this

Re: Coming round to SURS...

2002-10-22 Thread Simo Sorce
On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 20:02, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: i have a question for the people who sponsor the samba team. when are you going to realise that your money is being wasted by not sponsoring me as a design architect on NT compatibility software suites for unix? Probably

[PATCH] security hole in Samba 3.0 start tls handling

2002-10-22 Thread Steve Langasek
It appears that in Samba 3.0, the meaning of ldap ssl = start tls is somewhat diluted. First, the start tls command is only ever issued if the given ldapsam URI has a protocol string of ldaps://, which is definitely an issue -- TLS is quite a different protocol from SSL, and the whole point of

Re: [PATCH] ldap connection caching (not ready!!!)

2002-10-22 Thread Andrew Bartlett
Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote: Hi Andrew, here's the working version of my ldap connection chaching patch with looping (we retry after 0.5, 2, 4.5, 8, 12.5, 18, 24.5 seconds) Been very busy with assignments, but this patch looks good - but can you move the common code into a helper?

Re: [PATCH] ldap connection caching (not ready!!!)

2002-10-22 Thread Andrew Bartlett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 But we want to add one - and I want it for non-unix accounts. What I propose is that we get the nextrid idea bedded down in non-unix accounts, then expand it from there when we figure out the other issues. I

Re: Coming round to SURS...

2002-10-22 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 06:07:21PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 06:02:35PM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: i have a question for the people who sponsor the samba team. Rantings and dribble deleted i'm specifically referring to you - andrew - and

Re: Coming round to SURS...

2002-10-22 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:56:46PM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote: ask for more hard work. Plus we have not limited ourselves to solve the problem locally, but to solve the problem in a distributed environment. yes: that was - and is - the whole point of sursswitch. having done the surs draft

How Samba let us down

2002-10-22 Thread Chris de Vidal
Before you read this, I want to state (for reasons listed below) that I don't expect an answer (advice is welcomed, but please read this email carefully before answering). I'm sharing this with the community with the hope that better software results from our sad experience... BACKGROUND I've