-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
> > I found it. Who came up with the function names? They're horrible!
>
> Originally it was an attempt to follow underlying mechanism name.
> As 'net' gets general and therefore complicated tool, we gett
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 06:50:52PM -0500, Jim McDonough wrote:
>
> >> >And why are there two functions for changing a machine trust account?
> >> Dunno. Perhaps Rafal knows?
> >
> >Rafal know only what he read in the code. Are we talking about
> >net_rpc_join_oldstyle() and net_rpc_join_newstyle(
>> >And why are there two functions for changing a machine trust account?
>> Dunno. Perhaps Rafal knows?
>
>Rafal know only what he read in the code. Are we talking about
>net_rpc_join_oldstyle() and net_rpc_join_newstyle() functions ?
>Just want to make sure...
Whoops, I was just reading too fas
Hi All,
samba 2.2.7 built with:
./configure
make
make install
(That is, no special build options)
in our smb.conf the line:
logon script = %u.bat:
^
|
lowercase --
When trying to login (from Windows 9x,NT, 2K or Linux with w
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 03:20:58PM -0500, Jim McDonough wrote:
>
> >And why are there two functions for changing a machine trust account?
> Dunno. Perhaps Rafal knows?
Rafal know only what he read in the code. Are we talking about
net_rpc_join_oldstyle() and net_rpc_join_newstyle() functions ?
J
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 02:09:45PM -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Jim McDonough wrote:
>
> >
> > >Can someone confirm or deny that there is not net equivalent
> > >of "smbpasswd -j DOMAIN -R PDC" in HEAD? All I see r
[follow-up myself .. :) ]
unfortunately I wasn't able to follow the 3.0 development nor this ML
very closely. Does a porting guide from 2.2.x to 3.0 exist?
I've just discovered that the following code
void send_message(pstring msg) {
[..]
unix_to_dos(msg);
len = strlen(msg);
I'm using Samba 2.2.5 and CUPS to handle printing on our network.
Unfortunately, the smbprn.xx spool files are not being cleaned up and
instead are quickly filling the spool directory. Is their a setting or
option to ensure the files are cleaned up once sent to the printer? I am
aware th
Hi.
I suggest the following small SAMBA code improvement in
printing area.
All known SAMBA versions can't return to Windows
client any return code after calling "print command".
I need it therefore I made the following SAMBA changes:
Change prototype of function "print_job_end"
>Possible -- just wasn't aware of it. (It's *really* fun trying to
>figure out how these guys work by tearing into the sources. Ah,
>well...)
That's why we put the help online for net. Please let us know if you find
any problems with it...
Jim McDonough
IBM Linux T
>>To Jerry's original question: it seems to fail without an admin
>>username/pw. With the old smbpasswd, it would work if a machine account
>>was first set up on the PDC -- now it doesn't.
>Hmmm, I'll have to look into that. At one point it was "net rpc join
>oldstyle" or something like that...
>I found some code named rpc_join_oldstyle_internals() should do
>it, but I've not actually verified this.
Yeah, it looks like "net rpc join oldstyle" or "net rpc join" should both
execute this...
Jim McDonough
IBM Linux Technology Center
Samba Team
6 Minuteman Drive
>And why are there two functions for changing a machine trust account?
Dunno. Perhaps Rafal knows?
Jim McDonough
IBM Linux Technology Center
Samba Team
6 Minuteman Drive
Scarborough, ME 04074
USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (207) 885-5565
IBM tie-lin
>I found it. Who came up with the function names? They're horrible!
That's one part of net I won't claim responsibility for... :-)
Jim McDonough
IBM Linux Technology Center
Samba Team
6 Minuteman Drive
Scarborough, ME 04074
USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Ken Cross wrote:
> To Jerry's original question: it seems to fail without an admin
> username/pw. With the old smbpasswd, it would work if a machine account
> was first set up on the PDC -- now it doesn't.
I found some code name
>To Jerry's original question: it seems to fail without an admin
>username/pw. With the old smbpasswd, it would work if a machine account
>was first set up on the PDC -- now it doesn't.
Hmmm, I'll have to look into that. At one point it was "net rpc join
oldstyle" or something like that...
---
To Jerry's original question: it seems to fail without an admin
username/pw. With the old smbpasswd, it would work if a machine account
was first set up on the PDC -- now it doesn't.
Ken
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gerald
(Jerry) C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Jim McDonough wrote:
>
> >Can someone confirm or deny that there is not net equivalent
> >of "smbpasswd -j DOMAIN -R PDC" in HEAD? All I see requires an admin
> >username/pw
>
> Just net rpc join should do it.
>
> Try "net help
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Jim McDonough wrote:
>
> >Can someone confirm or deny that there is not net equivalent
> >of "smbpasswd -j DOMAIN -R PDC" in HEAD? All I see requires an admin
> >username/pw
>
> Just net rpc join should do it.
>
> Try "net help
>Can someone confirm or deny that there is not net equivalent
>of "smbpasswd -j DOMAIN -R PDC" in HEAD? All I see requires an admin
>username/pw
Just net rpc join should do it.
Try "net help rpc join"
Jim McDonough
IBM Linux Technology Center
Samba Team
6 Minutema
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anyone?
Can someone confirm or deny that there is not net equivalent
of "smbpasswd -j DOMAIN -R PDC" in HEAD? All I see requires an admin
username/pw
cheers, jerry
--
Hewlett-P
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:17:16AM -0800, Herb Lewis wrote:
> STAT_ST_BLOCKSIZE should not depend on the filesystem blocksize.
> Look at the man page for stat(2) and see how st_blocks is
> defined. That is the number that needs to be used for STAT_ST_BLOCKSIZE
Yes - I should have seen your note e
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 07:12:20PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Ah you see this is the *exact* problem. This is why I ditched the
> code that uses stat.st_blksize. It was causing 64-bit copies on
> IRIX to fail.
>
> The fundamental misunderstanding (and it was mine also when I wrote
> this
STAT_ST_BLOCKSIZE should not depend on the filesystem blocksize.
Look at the man page for stat(2) and see how st_blocks is
defined. That is the number that needs to be used for STAT_ST_BLOCKSIZE
Patrick Welche wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 06:51:25PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On W
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 07:08:29PM +, Patrick Welche wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 06:51:25PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 05:48:43PM +, Patrick Welche wrote:
> >
> > > (Why isn't STAT_ST_BLOCKSIZE defined in configure.in for netbsd?)
> >
> > There is no
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 06:51:25PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 05:48:43PM +, Patrick Welche wrote:
>
> > (Why isn't STAT_ST_BLOCKSIZE defined in configure.in for netbsd?)
>
> There is no specific configure section for netbsd. Care to write one ?
I just had a loo
Hi everybody , my name is Marte, Actually, I'm testing Helios EtherShare(afp-smb-opi Software) to my company, however we have trouble with the resource fork when copying a mac file from a pc via samba. Is there a way to support resource fork in samba.
I'm using
samba-2.2.6
RedHat 7.3
XFS
With aforementioned Dec 4 17:52 GMT CVS code, I get a core dump from
smbclient -L //machine
Core was generated by `smbclient'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0 0x807ccff in push_string (base_ptr=0x0, dest=0x8130028,
src=0x80a70a0 "PC NETWORK PROGRAM 1.0", dest_len=4
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 05:48:43PM +, Patrick Welche wrote:
> With cvs code from Dec 4 16:55 GMT on i386-unknown-netbsdelf1.6K,
>
> Compiling smbd/trans2.c
> smbd/trans2.c: In function `get_allocation_size':
> smbd/trans2.c:42: request for member `st_size' in something not a structure or unio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Ken Cross wrote:
> G'Day:
>
> In the get_pdc_ip routine in libsmb/namequery.c in -current, there's an
> assertion:
>
> SMB_ASSERT(count == 1);
>
> which bombs out if the PDC has multiple IP addresses. I have a PDC with
> 3 n
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 04:48:32PM +0100, Michael Steffens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> noticed that very recently a bunch of patches was checked
> in the SAMBA_2_2 CVS tree, correcting STAT_ST_BLOCKSIZE
> to be 512 for a number of platforms. (see configure and
> configure.in)
>
> It remained on 8192 for HP-
I'm using a Debian woody based system (partially upgraded to 'testing'
in order to use tls with ldap), with samba_2.2.7 source built by
debian/rules with LDAP turned on, using gcc 3.0.4,
libldap2-tls_2.0.23-14, and libldap2_2.0.23-14.
I'm setting up PDC service -- when I try to join a windows mach
With cvs code from Dec 4 16:55 GMT on i386-unknown-netbsdelf1.6K,
Compiling smbd/trans2.c
smbd/trans2.c: In function `get_allocation_size':
smbd/trans2.c:42: request for member `st_size' in something not a structure or union
smbd/trans2.c 39-43:
#if defined(HAVE_STAT_ST_BLOCKS) && defined(STAT_S
Hi,
noticed that very recently a bunch of patches was checked
in the SAMBA_2_2 CVS tree, correcting STAT_ST_BLOCKSIZE
to be 512 for a number of platforms. (see configure and
configure.in)
It remained on 8192 for HP-UX (which is the number given
by st_blksize) and which seems to be just as wrong t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Matthew Mastracci wrote:
> I just spent a few hours diagnosing a problem with 2.2.7 on Redhat 7.3
> that turned out to be (what I believe) is a packaging bug.
>
> The symbolic link from libnss_winbind.so to libnss_winbind.so.2 is
35 matches
Mail list logo
