Jason Hihn wrote:
Good comments, all of them.
I hate to say it, but it really comes down to the fact that you are
trying to hide behind a protocol, instead of doing a proper
firewall for your LAN. No offense intended
None is taken. *I* did not set it up this way, and I had thought of
s
Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 09:26:24PM -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote:
Jason Hihn wrote:
I've a need for Samba to work over NetBEUI. We have a file server
here that only speaks that way to bar out TCP-based hackers,
There is a popular misconception that you can use
At 8:14 PM -0800 12/9/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 08:10:00PM -0800, Conrad Minshall wrote:
>>
>> A local filesystem has to return EFBIG to Samba (per POSIX "write" system
>> call def'n) and in the Samba source I'm looking at EFBIG isn't used
>> anywhere relevant to a WRITE
Hi,
I have made more progress on editreg. Perhaps others would like to help
complete it. It needs more work on the iterators, plus the access
functions. It also needs code to write registries and to hanldle command
line etc.
Here is an example of the only thing it can do so far, which is to li
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I suspect the key change in the Debian build is enabling of LFS support;
Could be, but I have reimplemented each of the LFS functions that were in
there originally in a manner that they should work with the current C library.
I have discovered missing
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 09:26:24PM -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote:
> Jason Hihn wrote:
>
> >I've a need for Samba to work over NetBEUI. We have a file server
> >here that only speaks that way to bar out TCP-based hackers,
>
> There is a popular misconception that you can use NetBeui in this way.
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 11:16, Esh, Andrew wrote:
> Microsoft to offer Linux software?
>
> In a major strategy shift, Microsoft Corp. will introduce software based on
> the Linux open source operating system in 2004 ...
>
> (Copyrighted article, or I'd post it. Here's a link: )
>
> http://www.c
I noticed references to interesting sounding netbeui patches for Linux
kernel from Procom at:
http://bazar.conectiva.com.br/~acme/patches/wip/
Based on the official kernel status looks like they won't make 2.5 though.
Steve French
Senior Software Engineer
Linux Technology Center - IBM Au
Title: MSLinux!?!?!?
Do
we die from an world war III nukewar or M$ crapcode in good systems in near
future ?
How
do we patch this ?
--
Ulf
This
message might not be written by me.
Sue
/dev/nul
-Original Message-From: Ryan Benner
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, Dec
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:16:26PM -0600, Esh, Andrew wrote:
> Microsoft to offer Linux software?
> In a major strategy shift, Microsoft Corp. will introduce software based on
> the Linux open source operating system in 2004 ...
Note that the above quote is a *prediction* on the part of analysts.
I was running the audit.so VFS example module in an earlier version of
Samba (2.2.3, I believe) without troubles for a while now. I just
upgraded to the samba-2.2.7 RPM provided by the Samba Team and noticed
problems on the share that servers a file-sharing based Windows
networked application pack
Title: MSLinux!?!?!?
I
noticed that myself earlier today. Quite interesting.
Ryan
-Original Message-From: Esh, Andrew
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 10:20
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
MSLinux!?!?!?
Microsoft to offer Linux software?
In a
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 10:20:38PM -0600, Jim Morris wrote:
:
> I am not telling you someone out there has not developed a NETBEUI
> protocol stack that will run on Linux (I am assuming you are running
> Linux). But as a long time network administrator and programmer
> myself, I cannot imagine
Title: MSLinux!?!?!?
Microsoft to offer Linux software?
In a major strategy shift, Microsoft Corp. will introduce software based on the Linux open source operating system in 2004 ...
(Copyrighted article, or I'd post it. Here's a link: )
http://www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/biztech/12/10/meta.lin
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:54:52PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:27:07PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > wrote:
> >> I have smbwrapper and smbsh working on Debian/woody with the Linux 2.4
> >> kernel and the default C library: libc-2.2.5.so.
> > Yes, I'm interested
Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As a user, I welcome alternatives to smbfs.
Patch has been posted.
> (I'm also looking forward to trying out
> http://us1.samba.org/samba/Linux_CIFS_client.html)
I did minimal testing of it. It seems to work fine, as long as you don't need
to access anyt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:27:07PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> I have smbwrapper and smbsh working on Debian/woody with the Linux 2.4
>> kernel and the default C library: libc-2.2.5.so.
> Yes, I'm interested - please post patches. Pressure of other things
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:27:07PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have smbwrapper and smbsh working on Debian/woody with the Linux 2.4 kernel
and the default C library: libc-2.2.5.so. ...
Based on search results that I've found, there's been almost no work on
gettin
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:27:07PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I have smbwrapper and smbsh working on Debian/woody with the Linux 2.4 kernel
> and the default C library: libc-2.2.5.so. There is a problem that rears its
> ugly head with a few programs (segmentation violation, presumably du
I have smbwrapper and smbsh working on Debian/woody with the Linux 2.4 kernel
and the default C library: libc-2.2.5.so. There is a problem that rears its
ugly head with a few programs (segmentation violation, presumably due to some
function which is not wrapped properly) but in general, and with
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin,
1) You did create a machine account (for an NT Workstation or Server)
using the Server Manager on the NT4 Domain?
Joining the domain will NOT work unless you do.
2) Try:
smbpasswd -j lister -r cat -Uadministrator
and when promp
I just installed the debian a20 packages
(thanks steve and eloy)
i'm posting to technical because it's about an alpha releas
Once or twice a day i have to kill runaway processes (-9 required)
they seem to as much cpu as is available
I just saw one client with three connections to the server
1
Good comments, all of them.
> I hate to say it, but it really comes down to the fact that you are
> trying to hide behind a protocol, instead of doing a proper firewall for
> your LAN. No offense intended
None is taken. *I* did not set it up this way, and I had thought of some of
the very sa
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 08:42, Jason Hihn wrote:
> Up until the other day we didn't have an internet-visible, Unix-based
> host behind the router. We do now, so that is a concern of mine more
> than ever.
It sounds to me like you are relying on the ISP's router to protect you
from the Internet. And
(Please take this to [EMAIL PROTECTED], it's not a
development issue.)
Try
defining the IP address for "CAT" in your /etc/lmhosts file. Your WINS server
may not be supplying good information. Also, try to ping CAT at its IP address.
It doesn't appear to be reachable from where the Samba se
Have a problem connecting Samba 2.2.7 on Redhat Linux 7.2 to a Win NT 4 PDC. I have set the following in the smb.conf file:-
security = domain
password server = CAT
encrypt passwords = yes
local master = no
os level = 0
domain master = no
preferred master = no
domain logons = no
wins server = 17
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Hihn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> While I feel competent enough to make a solid firewall, our
> router to the
> internet is controlled by our ISP, and that is one trust
> relationship that
> would be sloppy of me to trust. Unfortunately, this box need
Thanks for all your help everyone, not just John. Indeed it is a small
network, around 20 computers that this box serves, and the NetBEUI traffic
is light.
I still sort-of disagree with the "no security advantage" statement though.
While I do know of NetBEUI exploits, IMHO it is still a good techn
On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 03:24 AM, Gareth Davies wrote:
Not sure what this thread is about exactly but if I catch the drift
correctly you may well find this useful:
http://www.nu2.nu/bootdisk/network/
Thanks - good resource if you need a boot floppy to get on the network.
However, t
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "John E. Malmberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 4:24 AM
Subject: Re: NetBEUI as main protocol
> On Monday, December 9, 2002, at 08:26 PM, John E. Malmberg wrote:
>
> > The only
30 matches
Mail list logo
