Andy Thomas wrote:
Has anyone heard any more about patch availability for this?
(Sun has closed bug 4700402, since is was a duplicate of 4735093;
4735093 is the current bug for this.)
People on this list have reported getting a t-patch to use.
How did you get it? What is the patch number?
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 03:35:11PM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> At 22:46 11.12.2002 +1100, Luke Howard wrote:
>
> >There was a small nit in the authentication subsystem that
> >prevented dynamic loading of authentication providers. The
> >attached patch fixes this.
> Hi Luke,
>
> I t
>Are you looking for loadable named pipe support or just loadable RPC
>support? We have a patch for the later but the former would be a
>slightly different implementation.
We would just like to dynamically hook in our "funnel" which replaces
the make_internal_rpc_pipe_p() and pipe I/O functions.
While convenient for web browsers, it's not exactly backwards-compatible for both GPG
and the average sysadmin who's probably struggling with verifying PGP signatures for
the first time. It's not Samba's fault; GPG just isn't very descriptive in it's error
message, which is somewhat misleading.
This renaming was to work around a browser problem where browsers
would think any file with a .gz anywhere in the path was a
gzipped file.
When the filenames differ use
gpg --verify samba-2.2.7a_tar_gz.asc samba-2.2.7a.tar.gz
David Lechnyr wrote:
>
> It's probably worth noting that your PGP
Has anyone heard any more about patch availability for this?
(Sun has closed bug 4700402, since is was a duplicate of 4735093;
4735093 is the current bug for this.)
People on this list have reported getting a t-patch to use.
How did you get it? What is the patch number? What version of
Sol
Scott, samba-techincal is ok for patches, but please send them in
diff -u format next time, so that they are easier to handle.
Simo.
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 21:05, Scott Hammond wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Im a newbie developer and Ive submitted a patch to
> this list a few days ago. Is this the best me
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:05:43PM -0800, Scott Hammond wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Im a newbie developer and Ive submitted a patch to
> this list a few days ago. Is this the best method to
> submit fixes, or what procedure should I follow? Will
> someone review my fix and add it to the code?
>
> http:
Hello,
Im a newbie developer and Ive submitted a patch to
this list a few days ago. Is this the best method to
submit fixes, or what procedure should I follow? Will
someone review my fix and add it to the code?
http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/2002-December/041226.html
Thank yo
It's probably worth noting that your PGP signature for new Samba 2.2.7a *FAILS*
verification (on both bzip2 and gzip'd files). The problem is not in the signature
itself, but the filename:
$ wget http://us1.samba.org/samba/ftp/samba-2.2.7a.tar.gz
$ wget http://us1.samba.org/samba
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Andy Thomas wrote:
>
> I think this would be quite useful. I already got good use out of the
> profiles program. I was able to copy a few hundred profiles from our
> production domain to our test domain, use the profiles program to change
> all the SIDs, and user's profi
I think this would be quite useful. I already got good use out of the
profiles program. I was able to copy a few hundred profiles from our
production domain to our test domain, use the profiles program to change
all the SIDs, and user's profiles worked.
As far as a registry editor, command
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 01:01:35AM +1100, Luke Howard wrote:
>
> I would like to add support for dynamic loading of named pipe
> providers in rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c.
>
> - Is anyone else working on this?
Not currently.
> - Would such a patch be accepted?
Yes. All providers linked in must be
Luke,
Are you looking for loadable named pipe support or just loadable RPC
support? We have a patch for the later but the former would be a
slightly different implementation.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Original message
>Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 09:40:25 -0500
>From: Jim McDonough <[EMAIL
>I would like to add support for dynamic loading of named pipe
>providers in rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c.
>
>- Is anyone else working on this?
Luke, our summer interns implemented this, and were just a few cleanups
away from having it checked in. They finished their summer and the work
has stagn
At 22:46 11.12.2002 +1100, Luke Howard wrote:
There was a small nit in the authentication subsystem that
prevented dynamic loading of authentication providers. The
attached patch fixes this.
Hi Luke,
I think your patch is wrong, then the builtin module will not be loaded...
the attached patch
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 13:31, Esh, Andrew wrote:
> Maybe post a couple of iterations of strace output? That would give us
> a clue what is being looped on.
i just tried to get an strace on a runaway samba...
here is the output of smbstatus with some information xxx'ed
notice pid 17205 and 19911
S
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 01:01:35AM +1100, Luke Howard wrote about 'dynamically
loadable named pipe providers':
> I would like to add support for dynamic loading of named pipe
> providers in rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c.
> - Is anyone else working on this?
Some guys from IBM were working on it. Ask
I would like to add support for dynamic loading of named pipe
providers in rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c.
- Is anyone else working on this?
- Would such a patch be accepted?
-- Luke
--
Luke Howard | PADL Software Pty Ltd | www.padl.com
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 03:24, Conrad Minshall wrote:
> My client maps NT_STATUS_DISK_FULL to EFBIG, but really this should be done
> by observing some Windows server. With W2K/NTFS I had no success - using
> SMB_SET_FILE_END_OF_FILE_INFO doesn't generate a sparse file so I fill up
> the disk before
There was a small nit in the authentication subsystem that
prevented dynamic loading of authentication providers. The
attached patch fixes this.
Index: auth.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/samba/source/auth/auth.c,v
retrieving revision 1.4
21 matches
Mail list logo
