On 10 Jan 2003, Andrew Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that the connection mutex should be sorted out in
> cli_full_connection(), rather than in individual apps. Then we can grab
> the mutex for netlogon when operating on that pipe, but I really think
> that end should be separate.
Title: DOS mode bits missing from Folders
I have a question about the following piece of code in HEAD smbd/dosmode.c, at line 139:
if (S_ISDIR(sbuf->st_mode))
result = aDIR | (result & aRONLY);
This causes the DOS mode "HSA" Hidden, System, and Archive bits to be st
uhmm I'm interested in this one.
but I have not understood what happened, exactly.
launch pdbedit with -d 5 option so that you get debugging on stdout and
maybe use tee to store a log of your operations plus logs.
thanks,
Simo.
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 23:38, Irving Carrion wrote:
> Sorry, tdb bac
Sorry, tdb backend.
-Original Message-
From: Jelmer Vernooij [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Jelmer Vernooij
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 2:59 PM
To: Irving Carrion
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Samba 2.999+3.0.alpha21-3 User Dissapears
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 01:27:50PM -
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 07:49:48AM +0100, Juergen Hasch wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >So if I'm understanding you correctly this is actually a kernel
> >bug - correct ?
> >
> >Can you point me at the areas in the kernel source where the problem
> >occurs so I can see how to make smbd work
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 06:59, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 01:27:50PM -0500, Irving Carrion wrote about 'RE: Samba
>2.999+3.0.alpha21-3 User Dissapears':
> > Here what's even more puzzling. If I run:
>
> > pdbedit -lv username
>
> > The user appears wow, great!
>
> > Bu
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 01:27:50PM -0500, Irving Carrion wrote about 'RE: Samba
2.999+3.0.alpha21-3 User Dissapears':
> Here what's even more puzzling. If I run:
> pdbedit -lv username
> The user appears wow, great!
> But if I do:
> pdbedit -lv > allusers.txt and then vi allusers.txt I d
Hello Andrew,
I'm sending it "To:" you because I found the following message
on the mailing list:
http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/2002-October/082150.html
The following is true at least under Solaris (all releases) and
perhaps other OS? Linux is probably not affected???
Here's the "bug
Here what's even more puzzling. If I run:
pdbedit -lv username
The user appears wow, great!
But if I do:
pdbedit -lv > allusers.txt and then vi allusers.txt I don't see the user
in that list.
Any hints anyone?
-Original Message-
From: IRVING
Hello All!
After users began compl
Title: Message
samba-2.2.7
if the following
condition is false
if (OPEN_FSP(fsp)
&& fsp->can_lock && (fsp->conn == conn))
.
.
.
then the return
value is uninitialized
Martin Pool [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> I hypothesized to ab that in NT there is some kind of table
> indexed by IP (or client name?) holding the challenges. I wonder why?
I found a similar limitation in a commercial RADIUS server I was testing
against. Any given person could have only one chal
I have managed to get pam_winbind.so (2.2.7a) to work on IBM AIX 5.2 but the
sys_getpwnam() subroutine still need a user to be defined in the /etc/passwd
file.
Is it nessessary to port winbind_nss to AIX as a loadable authentication
module (sort of similar to nss)?
I have done the following to
Hello All!
After users began complaining about not being able to access some
network resources, I noticed that some of the users are missing in samba
using command:
pdbedit -lv
S, I retry and create that user again using command:
smbpasswd -a hisusername
This does not add the user. So in
Ignacio Coupeau wrote:
> http://www.unav.es/cti/ldap-smb/ldap-smb-2_2-howto.html#patches
>
> Tested the rebind stuff with ldap in round robin (master/slave)
> Some fixes
Applied, compiled and will test ... Thanks.
> Tar and diff -uRn textfiles available:
> http://www.unav.es/cti/ldap-smb/
Hi,
since some Months, our Windows 2000 and Windows-XP Clients have the Problem,
that in Explorer the Connection to the Share on the Samba-Server seems to be
lost. But on clicking on the drive letter in can be reactivated. The Clients
habe Windows 2000 SP3 or Windows XP SP1.
The Samba-Server is i
On 14 Jan 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> get_mutex:
> ServerReqChallenge
> ServerAuthenticate2
> release_mutex:
Yes, that's what we meant.
I hypothesized to ab that in NT there is some kind of table
indexed by IP (or client name?) holding the challenges. I wonder why?
Perhaps th
Elia,
>I would like to know whether it is expected in a short term the role
> management assignment of administrative privileges to different users (apart
> from root) for the implementation of administrative burden like account
> operator, machine account, etc. As an example, I tried to assig
Hi,
I´m new in group and need help.
I have a SAMBA server for PRINTERS and FILES, but since
yesterday I don´t get to printer for WINDOWS. If I get "lp -d printer
arquivo.txt" in linux, printer OK, but I get "cat arquivo.txt >
\\linux\printer" in windows, come t
Hi to all
I am testing the latest alpha version of Samba 3.0 in an environment
with the ldap backend using openldap and the smbldap tool from
http://samba.idealx.org .We have implemented a domain with Samba acting as
both PDC and BDC: for the account synchronization we are using the replica
m
Here's the actual patch to fix the problem below (same patch for
SAMBA_3_0 and HEAD):
# cvs diff -r SAMBA_3_0 -pu ads_struct.c
Index: ads_struct.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/samba/source/libads/ads_struct.c,v
retrieving revision 1.13.2.3
Hi all,
(I posted this to the samba@ list last week, but I haven't had any
replies, and since it's somewhat technical, and also somewhat urgent,
I'm reposting here.)
I have a 2.2.7a member server (on Debian unstable), acting as a file
server for a W2k domain (which also has some NT4 clients, i
21 matches
Mail list logo
