Re: --with-cracklib for Samba

2003-01-15 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 16:17, John H Terpstra wrote: > Pierre, > > Sounds interesting. Please keep this going as there is a lot of interest > in forced secure password change process. I certainly agree, as the one who put the comment there in the first place :-). We already have 'min password age

Re: Patch for Samba 2.2.6 & 2.2.7 to work on OS X

2003-01-15 Thread jra
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 01:07:34AM -0500, Michael Bennett wrote: > > So... comments? Does the patch Do The Right Thing? Think this patch or > something similar could get merged sometime? :) I remember looking at this patch. The problem is it does something like : #ifdef *BSD.. new cod

Patch for Samba 2.2.6 & 2.2.7 to work on OS X

2003-01-15 Thread Michael Bennett
In version 2.2.6 there was a change in util_sec.c that causes Samba to fail on OS X due to use of setregid(). Previously, Samba worked flawlessly on OS X. Apparently this is also a problem in other BSD-based operating systems, as this sparse bug report indicates in its headers: http://bugs.sa

Re: --with-cracklib for Samba

2003-01-15 Thread John H Terpstra
Pierre, Sounds interesting. Please keep this going as there is a lot of interest in forced secure password change process. Strongly suggest getting the official sources updated, as you have already suggested. There should be someone who might want to help get this into the official code tree. Who

--with-cracklib for Samba

2003-01-15 Thread Pierre Belanger
Hi all, Last night I did a "grep -i todo" in the source code, to see if I could contribute a little bit more ;-) I found the following: smbd/chgpasswd.c: /* TODO: Add cracklib support here */ I started working on this last night (using SAMBA_3_0 branch) and do have something working (the "con

Re: CVS update: samba/source/nsswitch

2003-01-15 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 12:50:57PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote: > On 16 Jan 2003, Andrew Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Win2k has a bug (feature?) where there is a connection reset if there is > > a second connection from the SAME IP, before the first > > session-setup. > > So an unpriv

Re: CVS update: samba/source/nsswitch

2003-01-15 Thread jra
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 12:50:57PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote: > On 16 Jan 2003, Andrew Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Win2k has a bug (feature?) where there is a connection reset if there is > > a second connection from the SAME IP, before the first > > session-setup. > > So an unpriv

Re: CVS update: samba/source/nsswitch

2003-01-15 Thread Martin Pool
On 16 Jan 2003, Andrew Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Win2k has a bug (feature?) where there is a connection reset if there is > a second connection from the SAME IP, before the first > session-setup. So an unprivileged process on the client can cause a local denial of service just by re

Re: 3.0alpha21 performance degraded comparing to 2.2.5

2003-01-15 Thread Richard Sharpe
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Chere Zhou wrote: > > I tested using the same hardware for windows client and the server, same > setup and configuration. Network bandwidth was gigabits. I built both 2.2.5 > and 3.0alpha21 from source. > > Here are my numbers for a single windows 2000 client, single sa

3.0alpha21 performance degraded comparing to 2.2.5

2003-01-15 Thread Chere Zhou
I tested using the same hardware for windows client and the server, same setup and configuration. Network bandwidth was gigabits. I built both 2.2.5 and 3.0alpha21 from source. Here are my numbers for a single windows 2000 client, single samba server test. For reads, 2.2.5 gets 120 Mbps, w

Re: CVS update: samba/source/utils

2003-01-15 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 16 Jan 2003, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > The reason I didn't merge this on previous passes (yes, I've done > merging too) is that I don't agree that this should be in 'net'. There > isn't any logical connection for it to be here - it should probably

Re: CVS update: samba/source/include

2003-01-15 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 16 Jan 2003, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > If you were going to start merging NTLMSSP changes across, then you need > to add ntlmssp.h, otherwise this looks like you just missed it when > merging includes.h/rpc_dce.h. > > I was going to merge those cha