Hello, here is the smb.conf and a few other that I have modified:
When we created the "join" to the NT-domain we did not put the option "-r
domain_controller" as told in the "Sync Samba and Windows users with winbind", because
I believe that the "password server =
*" will find the domain_contr
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 05:30:45AM +, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 09:13:38PM -0600, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
> > I *think* it's a rule that Kerberos authentication is always used with
> > SMB over TCP (port 445) and that Kerberos is *not* used with SMB over NBT
> > (p
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 09:13:38PM -0600, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
> I *think* it's a rule that Kerberos authentication is always used with
> SMB over TCP (port 445) and that Kerberos is *not* used with SMB over NBT
> (port 139).
>
> Am I wrong?
I think you are wrong. As far as I know ther
I *think* it's a rule that Kerberos authentication is always used with
SMB over TCP (port 445) and that Kerberos is *not* used with SMB over NBT
(port 139).
Am I wrong?
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.or
I used the following environment:
- Samba 2.2.7a
- AIX 5.2
- PDC on NT
Operations that work:
- Change a manually added, with acledit, acl user or group entry from NT
- Remove a manually, added, with acledit, acl user or group entry from NT
Operations that does not work:
- Add acl user or group e
I've just upgrade the CVS pserver running on samba.org. If anyone sees
any problems please let me know via email.
Luckily we are running the anonymous CVS pserver in a chroot jail which
is updated via rsync from the actual repository so the effects of anyone
exploiting the bug would be minimal.
Richard
Thanks for the reply. Here is the patch against cvs head as of today.
The original commentry follows
Best Regards
Andrew
> Here is a little patch to allow usage of the wildcard entry in the
> (YP/NIS+) automount map. Basic operation is a follows; In a
> automounting environm
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 02:54:15PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have downloaded mod_ntlm_winbind "somwhere" from the samba-site.
> Seems that it is not maintained (any more).
> Does anyone know of an alternative module for mod_ntlm_winbind that works ?
> If not, I'd like to maintain this mod
Can you post your smb.conf. It will help in solving the problem.
- Ranjit
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bertil Starck
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 5:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Samba + ACL and Windows NT
Hi!
I have upgrad
I've got samba installed on several different machines in my environment,
but samba on the linux machines doesn't seem to use nscd all the time. On
my RedHat 7.1 machine running samba 2.2.7, it uses nscd for name lookups
initially, then decides to bypass nscd and lookup names directly. I have
st
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Andrew Bird (Sphere Systems) wrote:
> Hi all
> I have been following samba-technical for a couple of years now. I have seen
> in the past, intense debate over whether patches should / or not be included.
> I am quite surprised that my first code patch to the list has b
> > every now and then I find in the logfiles the following
> messages from
> > samba (v2.2.7):
> >
> > [2003/01/05 15:02:35, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(531)
> > tdb(/var/lock/samba/locks/locking.tdb): tdb_oob len -2320
> beyond eof
> > at 8192 [2003/01/05 15:02:35, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(53
Hi all
I have been following samba-technical for a couple of years now. I have seen
in the past, intense debate over whether patches should / or not be included.
I am quite surprised that my first code patch to the list has been met with
indifference. I provoke neither approval nor disap
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi !
>
> Here is my story:
> I have working config. with samba 2.2.7a (compiled from sources),
openldap-2.0.23-4 (rpms) on rh 7.3 (2.4.20 with ext3 patch),
smbldap-tools-0.7-2. (First server is a LDAP server, second
Hi!
I have upgraded Samba V2.2.7 as the whitepaper: "Samba with ACL support on Linux for
S/390" by Michael Weisbach.
and "Sync Samba and Windows users with winbind" by Scott Lowe.
Samba is built with these parameters:
Mammut/tmp/samba-2.2.7/source/./configure ?with-winbind ?with-acl-support ?w
Continuing the saga:
Groups are not migrated by the ldap_nua backend, even if I create a
posixGroup entry. After a bit of prodding, I found the latter was
because Samba had set up group mappings in group_mapping.tdb, which my
manually-created LDAP groups didn't agree with. Removing
group_mapping.td
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 13:41, Tom wrote:
> The offset is 8 bytes (on my system) when you compiled samba. I guess you did
> not compile your testcase with -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
> to make sure it is 8 bytes on compile time.
> Please try this and report back.
Hmm, seems like t
Hi !
Here is my story:
I have working config. with samba 2.2.7a (compiled from sources), openldap-2.0.23-4
(rpms) on rh 7.3 (2.4.20 with ext3 patch), smbldap-tools-0.7-2. (First server is a
LDAP server, second - PDC (samba with ldap), third - (samba joined to domain with ldap
support switched o
18 matches
Mail list logo
