Hmm ... the helpful email client wrapped some of the lines. The patch
is attached.
Ken
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cross
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 11:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Finding group members - fix to win
Samba-folk:
There's a problem in the SAMBA_3_0 finding all members of a group using
LDAP (lookup_groupmem in nsswitch/winbindd_ads.c).
It currently gets all the "member" records for a group, but the primary
group membership for users don't get included in that set.
The primaryGroupID in user r
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 10:54:19AM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> Can anyone point me at documentation on the limitations of a downlevel
> server being a member server in an AD network?
>
> The specific case I am thinking of is a Samba-2.2.x-based server.
I don't have any documentation but I c
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 10:53:17PM +0100, Jean Francois Micouleau wrote:
> >
> >
> > A more elegant solution is to use EA.
>
> Yep - that's on my list of things to do for 3.0.x. :-).
if I may add, put the DOS bits in the VFS bucket. It will be
Hi,
Has anyone tried this or does anyone have any opinions on what would
happen if we refuse to provide mangled names in the responses to a
find-first or find-next?
It seems that if we set the Short File Name Len to 0 in responses, that
might work.
I wonder which apps will break in that case?
Hi there!
If you are a programmer
who has worked on Samba software code base, I have a great opportunity for you!
Our client is a progressive company and will consider having someone work
remotely for their need. 2+ years of Samba experience plus 6+years of development
experience is req
Hi,
Can anyone point me at documentation on the limitations of a downlevel
server being a member server in an AD network?
The specific case I am thinking of is a Samba-2.2.x-based server.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, rsharpe[at]ns.aus.com, rsharpe[at]samba.org,
sharpe[at]ethereal.com, http:/
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Herb Lewis wrote:
> I did a quick check on the SAMBA_2_2 tree and got the following size
> differences when they were linked against libsmbclient instead of
> the "normal" linking. I've attached the patch to Makefile.in I used.
> Before running any of the commands you need to
I did a quick check on the SAMBA_2_2 tree and got the following size
differences when they were linked against libsmbclient instead of
the "normal" linking. I've attached the patch to Makefile.in I used.
Before running any of the commands you need to make sure you copy
libsmbclient.so to your libr
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 10:53:17PM +0100, Jean Francois Micouleau wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Pagani Jr, Ronald wrote:
>
> > Why not store DOS bit modes in an accompanying dot file? (The DOS
> > modes then read by smbd if it (the dot file) exists)
>
> this idea has already been bitten to
After I asked Sun to escalate our case a few weeks ago, we received
a binary fix for the fcntl bug for Solaris 8 and 9. It was not a patch,
just a tarball.
Last fall, users were taking 5 - 10 minutes to download XP profiles
with samba 2.2.5, but only 10 - 20 seconds with samba 2.0.6, with
Uwe E. Faber wrote:
Hi i try to compile samba-2.2.7a on a Solaris 8 System, first i make
the ./configure after this i try a make and then i got the error:
using LIBS = -lsec -lgen -lsocket -lnsl -ldl
Linking bin/smbd
ld: fatal: file rpc_server/srv_pipe.o: unknown file type
ld: fatal: File proces
Hi i try to compile samba-2.2.7a on a Solaris 8 System, first i make
the ./configure after this i try a make and then i got the error:
using LIBS = -lsec -lgen -lsocket -lnsl -ldl
Linking bin/smbd
ld: fatal: file rpc_server/srv_pipe.o: unknown file type
ld: fatal: File processing errors. No outpu
The purpose of this mail is to make sure no one else is
working on / has already finished hacking samba's file
change notification support to support notification of
individual file changes. If not, I plan on doing so forthwith.
More details:
I've been wrestling with samba for the past couple
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 03:46:26PM +0100, Nicki Messerschmidt, Linksystem Muenchen
GmbH wrote:
> Hi there,
> I have a really ugly problem, which, as I know is partially selfmade.
> But to the problem:
> I have five servers running samba-2.2.3a-12 (latest Debian Woody
> release) which are controlle
erx wrote:
> I think there's a way to disable Workstation trust account password
> changes on the clients. Would this solve your problem? If so let me
> know and I'll try to find the magic registry setting that does this.
Would be a temporary workaround, because each client would have to be
touched
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean Francois Micouleau
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 3:53 PM
> To: Pagani Jr, Ronald
> Cc: Gerald (Jerry) Carter; Esh, Andrew;
> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: DOS mode bits missing from Folders
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 22
Hi there,
I have a really ugly problem, which, as I know is partially selfmade.
But to the problem:
I have five servers running samba-2.2.3a-12 (latest Debian Woody
release) which are controlled by one master server. All of the five
servers act as pdc for an own nt-domain. Now to keep the administr
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I found a trash can patch quite some time ago on the Internet and managed to get
>> it to work with the latest Samba source.
(snip)
>> I figure the best way to get it working better is to let people know where they
>> can get it if they want to
19 matches
Mail list logo
