On Mon, 03 Feb 2003 17:20:26 -0600 (CST), Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
[...]
>Looks like the tdb went over the 4Gb line. As a quick work around,
>Stop nmbd; rm /var/run/samba/unexpected.tdb; and start nmbd back up.
No, this has never been a work-around. The problem comes up again VERY quickly.
At 01:29 04.02.2003 +1100, Arthur Barrett wrote:
Hi All!
I am new to Samba and this group and I have a question...
My company wants to make a "custom" version of Samba which is capable of
creating a "share" which is actually a union of two directories.
ie: instead of the share "\\samba\arthur"
On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 15:44:18 +0100, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> The system in question is a Debian i386 "stable" (3.0) system, kernel is
>> 2.4.20 release (with some patches such as EVMS and XFS, but EVMS is NOT in
use
>> for shares exported via Samba!!), Samba is 2.2.7a (a Debian package that I
>> c
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, P Ranjit Kumar wrote:
> I have been having this problem for a long time now. I have a few questions
> on how you have configured it.
>
> 1) How did you create the service principal host/machine.domain.com@REALM in
> Windows 2000 KDC?
I created it with OpenLDAP's ldapmodify af
At 10:14 04.02.2003 +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
At 01:29 04.02.2003 +1100, Arthur Barrett wrote:
Hi All!
I am new to Samba and this group and I have a question...
My company wants to make a "custom" version of Samba which is capable of
creating a "share" which is actually a union of
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:17:34AM +0100, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
> Ok, now /var/run/samba is an ext3 filesystem -- and the problem is back again.
> :-(
>
> So you could argue, "Ok, it's EVMS then which is the culprit," because
> filesystem is on an EVMS logical volume.
>
> But I simply cannot
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:17:34AM +0100, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
> Ok, now /var/run/samba is an ext3 filesystem -- and the problem is back
> again. :-(
Thanks nevertheless. As one resort, could you try
use mmap = no
Volker
msg05756/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> It would be fine to have config options for match witch files should be
> taken from with
> directory.
>
> something like this:
> dir1 path = /home/samba
> dir1 mode = readonly
> dir1 files = *.c,*.h,configure,Makefile
> dir1 exclude files =
>> I have been having this problem for a long time now. I have a few questions
>> on how you have configured it.
>>
>> 1) How did you create the service principal host/machine.domain.com@REALM in
>> Windows 2000 KDC?
>
>I created it with OpenLDAP's ldapmodify after I joined the machine to the
>dom
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 11:03, David Lee wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
>
> > It would be fine to have config options for match witch files should be
> > taken from with
> > directory.
> >
> > something like this:
> > dir1 path = /home/samba
> > dir1 mode = readonly
Hi!
Trivial patch, but for me quite useful. It was a surprise to see that
simply saying 'domain logons = yes' (nothing in domain master) gives
us ROLE_DOMAIN_PDC...
Volker
Index: samba/source/utils/testparm.c
===
RCS file: /space/vl
Hi everybody,
We are experiencing strange problems
with shared printers on samba 2.2.7a (the same phenomenon was observed
in 2.2.5).
Printing from Win9x, WinNT, Win2k works.
But when we try openning the printer,
from Win9x and Win2K: ok
From WinNT, we receive an "Access
denied Message".
Here
hello!
Sorry for late reply :-(
Here it is.
Thank you!
Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Dmitry Melekhov wrote:
Hello!
I can't get users list on win 98 with current CVS, it says something
like- try later.
And I see this in log
2003/01/31 13:41:05, 1] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(284)
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Luke Howard wrote:
> >I created it with OpenLDAP's ldapmodify after I joined the machine to the
> >domain. An LDIF like this should work:
>
> Interesting. According to Microsoft documentation, the servicePrincipalName
> can never be modified over LDAP, only over RPC.
Well, wha
Hi,
we are running a big Samba 2.2.7a server with Winbind (>100 concurrent
users, >600 id mappings created since then) since last weekend.
It's running quite well! :)
However, users are complaining about Samba being very slow when
NT ACL support is enabled. I'm suspecting that winbindd is the
bo
>On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Luke Howard wrote:
>
>> >I created it with OpenLDAP's ldapmodify after I joined the machine to the
>> >domain. An LDIF like this should work:
>>
>> Interesting. According to Microsoft documentation, the servicePrincipalName
>> can never be modified over LDAP, only over RPC.
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Ulf Bertilsson wrote:
>
> > I wonder what this means ?:
> >
> > "error packet at line 878 cmd=162 (SMBntcreateX) eclass=1 ecode=32"
>
> You could grab the #defines from incluee/doserr.h
>
> /* Error classes */
>
> #def
Ulf Bertilsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] asks:
> How can I best identify if this is in my os
> custiom posix wrapper, or an issue in the samba 2.0.7 core code ?
I can give you a version of source/lib/system.c for 2.0.7 that has built-in
tracing capabilities. We don't have "truss" on our system,
Nice description Simo. It caused me to think.
I can see two cases for the use of such a union. The first is where the user
wants to make a foreground overlay which they can edit, where files are made
read-write by copying from the background to the foreground. This appears
the same as a normal fil
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:17:34AM +0100, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 15:44:18 +0100, Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> >> The system in question is a Debian i386 "stable" (3.0) system, kernel is
> >> 2.4.20 release (with some patches such as EVMS and XFS, but EVMS is NOT in
> use
> >> fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Paul Green wrote:
> Attached is a patch for the 2_2 branch of samba that makes changes
> similar to the ones I recently submitted to the head and 3_0 branches. I
> have tested it locally on VOS and it works as expected. I have al
On Tue, 04 Feb 2003 09:37:17 -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
[...]
>> Why should Samba be the ONLY (apparent) application that doesn't feel hap=
>py with=20
>> XFS over EVMS?
>
>I'm running Samba on XFS+EVMS (on Debian ;) with no problems. Even on
>buggy versions of XFS, I've never seen this error;
Hi Garry,
I missed that in the original post, thanks.
Do you do a lot of printing? I seem to remember a problem
involving smbd's remaining open because of print status
requests or something that Jeremy Allison was working on,
but I can't find it.
Either way, I think upping your flocks table spa
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Dmitry Melekhov wrote:
hello!
Sorry for late reply :-(
Here it is.
OK, I wasn't precise enough. I was actually looking for a packet trace of
the problem. You can obtain such with:
tcpdump -i eth0 -s 1500 -w somefile.cap
started before you try to retrieve the userlist.
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:03:36AM +, David Lee wrote:
> Way, way back in the days of SunOS 4.1.x, Sun had their "translucent" file
> service: "tfs". (We never used this; I simply recall its existence.)
> Might this model be the sort of thing you are looking for? I see that the
> "man" pages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
Probably this is more of a debian than a Samba problem. To compile
Samba 2_2 CVS of today with acl support und Debian 3.0, I not only had
to apt-get acl-dev but also attr-dev. For me it was not possible to
compile acl-aware programs with -lacl due
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 07:38:31AM -0800, Jeff Mandel wrote:
> Here's gdb with bt from two processes 12279 and 12327
>
> root@reiger# gdb /usr/local/samba/bin/smbd 12279
> GNU gdb 5.0
> Copyright 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License,
Thanks for the reply. I have had problem with using
host/machine.domain.com@REALM principal when I had both Samba and Unix
services use the Windows 2000 KDC.
I will try to modify the principal name and see if it works. I will post my
results in here.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROT
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 07:38:31AM -0800, Jeff Mandel wrote:
> > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libpthread.so.1...done.
> > Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libpthread.so.1
jra wrote:>
> This is a much more interesting backtrace than the
> other. Why is smbd linking in pthread libraries ?
> smbd is *
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 02:12:29PM +0100, Michael Steffens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we are running a big Samba 2.2.7a server with Winbind (>100 concurrent
> users, >600 id mappings created since then) since last weekend.
>
> It's running quite well! :)
>
> However, users are complaining about Samba bein
David Collier-Brown -- Customer Engineering wrote:
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 07:38:31AM -0800, Jeff Mandel wrote:
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libpthread.so.1...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libpthread.so.1
jra wrote:>
This is a much more interesting backtrace than the
other.
Thanks,
Wensi Peng
Technical Services
Rogers Shared Services
Phone: (905) 513-5103
Indirectly to you from pbelanger:
--> pbelanger (~[EMAIL PROTECTED]) has
joined #samba-technical
I can't send mail to the samba-technical (some new IP address
on the external mail server not added in the DNS ... I did not
do that ;-)
Please let know
Can you do a "nm" on the library "libpthread" and the ones listed above it?
One of those probably has an unsatisfied reference to one of the functions
in libpthread.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Mandel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 1:59 PM
> To: David C
"Christopher R. Hertel" wrote: indirectly to you from pbelanger:
> Please let know jra that libnspr4.so and libnss3.so ARE linked
> to libpthread and libthread under Solaris
I assume libnspr4.so and libnss3.so are special libraries
provided as part of open LDAP: the So
Also, try loading a few other non-Samba programs into gdb, to see what they
require. Maybe threading is a common library to load.
On Linux, we have "ldd", which lists the libraries a program requires, and
whether they are to be found, and where. I don't remember the Solaris
equivalent. It's been t
Hello,
David Collier-Brown -- Customer Engineering wrote:
"Christopher R. Hertel" wrote: indirectly to you from pbelanger:
Thanx Christopher to forward the info.
Please let know jra that libnspr4.so and libnss3.so ARE linked
to libpthread and libthread under Solaris
I assume l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
> What exactly does that mean? I compiled Samba with large file support.
> Was this an error? I absolutely NEED large-file support. (To recap, this
> is under Debian/GNU Linux/i386 3.0, running kernel 2.4.20
gdb is thread aware. "help running" shows thread commands.
Note that gdb does not report the libraries it loads to support itself. The
ones listed are being searched for symbols to support the program being
debugged. If the thread library is being searched, it is because the program
being debugged
thank you, kurt
hello list
hello samba-team
well, maybe for most application this workaround would work. But from
the unix-point of view replacing a symbolic link with a windows-link is
like replacing a car with a donkey... Why should someone create a
symlink on a sambaserver which let's say is us
The problem is not in teaching samba anything. When you delete a
directory in windows explorer it doesn't just send a command to
delete the directory. It recurses down the directory and first
sends commands to delete each individual file and then sends a
command to delete the directory. Samba has
Hi All,
Well, i've managed to enable some debugging in syslog, I had to put in
/etc/syslog.conf
;*.debug
on the syslog line.
So at least I have an error which is being returned into syslog from
winbind.
This is what I get from winbind
Feb 4 21:13:17 coastdr pam_winbind[20753]: Verify user `l
Title: Dir with 900+ files look Empty
I am running Samba on Linux RedHat 7.3.
It is OK most of the time.
We use it for our ViewCvs viewer. Problem is when there are files called cmd (god knows who created that one) and others with dot prefix the directory does silly things. With the cmd
Hello all,
Andrew, true GDB is thread aware but I think last time I used
it (back in ~ 1998) I was writing a multi-threaded application
and I really remember like if it was yesterday: GDB was not
thread aware at that time. I'm glad to hear it's now thread
aware!
I found the following if it can he
Thanks for the interesting comments. I will take some time to digest them.
Pierre Belanger wrote:
Now I'm looking back at the truss with the libthread, all
I can say besides that it looks "ugly" , I wish I'd know
how to print what's in each memory location to figure out
if the program is doing
Jeff,
Ok, you're using nss_ldap from PDAL to use /etc/nsswitch.conf
like
passwd: ldap files (or reverse)
group: ldap files
etc
Right? (From what I recall that's what nss_ldap is used for).
If you did not compile with Samba, it means that if you do "ldd"
on "smbd" it should not print "libthread"
Hi Together
I have a problem with initialise the locking database. When i send the
command the following command .
unx10015# ./smbstatus -d -L
I received the this message.
using configfile = /tools/samba/samba-2.2.7/lib/smb.conf
Opened /var/log/css/samba-2.2.7/locks/connections.tdb
Failed to op
Hi
In our environement we have a very large sambaconfiguration. We have aprox.
1700 concurrent users on the system. I didn't found any information about
the scalabitity of samba in a such environement. So we became some Errors
with the authentication against NT-PDC (NT 4). Is there a limitaion of
p
Hi Together
I have a problem with initialise the locking database. When i send the
command the following command .
unx10015# ./smbstatus -d -L
I received the this message.
using configfile = /tools/samba/samba-2.2.7/lib/smb.conf
Opened /var/log/css/samba-2.2.7/locks/connections.tdb
Failed to op
49 matches
Mail list logo
