On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 06:23:41PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> One little malloc() could hardly make it any worse, although I will do
> a test tomorrow to check.
"One little malloc()" - I'll remind you of that quote later :-).
But please do the test, that's the only way we can really
be sure if
Hi all,
I have installed Samba 3.0 alpha 21 on my FreeBSD for a long time. I enable ACL and it
works fine when I connect from Win2k client. I can add and delete acl entry. Recently,
I use WinXP to connect to my server. When I try to add new ACL entry, I get a popup
message to ask username/pas
I've just compiled the CVS version of 2.2.x and it seems to have fixed the
problem. I'd been merrily patching each new version of Samba as it came out
;-)
Thanks,
Chris
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003 06:10:42 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 11:24:23AM +, Chris Wakelin wrote:
I'm wondering, why are our printing databases (for things like the print
queue) indexed by service name, rather than printer name?
Doesn't this mean we will get 'weird stuff' happening if we have two
names for a printer?
I'm getting some very weird behavior where printer name is based on %m,
with
Look at other parts in the code, a nice idea is to compare character by
character until the string is an ASCII one, as soon as we detect a non
ascii character we revert to the standard method and re-compare the
strings, Tridge has gained very good optimizations with this twchnique.
Simo.
On Tue,
Hi,
I run a MIT KRB5 KDC and succesfully can authenticate my W2K Clients
and users against the KDC. User- and machine-data are stored in a
OpenLDAP directory server, but no passwords, as I want to make use of
Kerberos. Although I compiled samba-3.0alpha21 --with-krb5 created
a cifs/machine.domain p
Our product uses Samba as a component. In our product we were forced to modify certain
parts of Samba, namely:
Winbindd running over TCP (to a remote host)
Smbd listening to an additional "failover" port.
Allow listening on non-broadcast interfaces.
All these changes are very minimal.
In order
hi,
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 05:57:55PM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote:
> Our product uses Samba as a component. In our product we were forced to
> modify certain parts of Samba, namely:
>
> Winbindd running over TCP (to a remote host)
this sounds very interesting.
> Smbd listening to an additional "f
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Guenther Deschner wrote:
> you have forgotten to add that patchfile :)
Note that since last month the Samba listserver has started filtering
message attachments:
http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/2003-January/041954.html
Inline your patches in the message bod
Very well then - but this might seriously screw up wrapping:
Our product uses Samba as a component. In our product we were forced to modify certain
parts of Samba, namely:
Winbindd running over TCP (to a remote host)
Smbd listening to an additional "failover" port.
Allow listening on non-broadcas
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Guenther Deschner wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 05:57:55PM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote:
> > Our product uses Samba as a component. In our product we were forced to
> > modify certain parts of Samba, namely:
> >
> > Winbindd running over TCP (to a remote host)
This, o
Hi,
I first want to thank *everyone* who participated in the previous
thread and when needed, took the time to add their valuable
comments.
I attached "password-quality.c" (it's just this part) -- I hope I
got this right -- if not let me know what to change and I'll do it.
At the end of the file,
Shot me -- I added one line just before sending my previous
mail. If you intend to compile it on your own, change "prresult"
to "presult" line #261.
I'm actually thinking to leave that line there, with a higher
log level.
Voila.
Pierre B.
a single left brace char, which results in
:
MYBOX:/usr/local/src/samba-2.2.7a/source/lib# patch util_sock.c
patch-util_sock-20030218
patching file util_sock.c
patch: malformed patch at line 25: {
So assuming line-wrap did something Bad to that line, I edited the patch
file
t; with this patch - first, if I save the patch as it appeared
> in my Outlook
> window, then line 25 consists of a single left brace char,
> which results in
> :
>
>MYBOX:/usr/local/src/samba-2.2.7a/source/lib# patch util_sock.c
> patch-util_sock-20030218
>patch
In the embedded/real time world, malloc() and friends are strongly
deprecated as you can't predict how long they will take. They have to
go through a linked list of unknown length and may even start a
garbage collection.
If StrCaseCmp() is really that sensitive w.r.t. processor cycles, you
be
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 10:49:28PM +0100, Ludolf Holzheid wrote:
>
> In the embedded/real time world, malloc() and friends are strongly
> deprecated as you can't predict how long they will take. They have to
> go through a linked list of unknown length and may even start a
> garbage collection.
Hello,
I am using 3.0a21. If I use "kinit user@DOMAIN" with a user that does not
have privilege to join a machine into the domain, I get core dump using "net
ads join". This happens when the computer account does not exist in the
domain. If the computer account exists in the domain, I get th
(i also sent this mail to samba-bugs (address posted in README)
Hi. I recently downloaded samba-3.0alpha21, because I had an integration with windows
2003 Active Directory project. I am trying to use smbclient to authenticate to the
Active Directory schema via Kerberos. I am able to log in an
On 18 Feb 2003, "Boyce, Nick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sorry - I'm probably doing something dumb, but I still get failures even
> with this patch - first, if I save the patch as it appeared in my Outlook
> window, then line 25 consists of a single left brace char, which results in
> :
You
On 18 Feb 2003, Ludolf Holzheid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the embedded/real time world, malloc() and friends are strongly
> deprecated as you can't predict how long they will take. They have
> to go through a linked list of unknown length and may even start a
> garbage collection.
Well tha
Good evening ladies and gents,
The SNIA definition of the data required for SMB_QUERY_FILE_ALL_INFO
does not appear to be correct. Furthermore, Ethereal's interpretation
does not seem right, either.
Here's what SNIA says:
TIME CreationTime;
TIME LastAccessTime;
TIME LastWriteTime
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Joey Collins wrote:
> The SNIA definition of the data required for SMB_QUERY_FILE_ALL_INFO
> does not appear to be correct. Furthermore, Ethereal's interpretation
> does not seem right, either.
That is quite possible. We often rely on the SNIA doc, and then change
things if
Richard Sharpe wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Joey Collins wrote:
:
> > My questions:
> >
> > 1) Can anyone else confirm my interpretation?
>
> If you can send us a capture, we can look at it to see if we agree with
> your interpretation, and perhaps modify Ethereal as well.
Before modifying Et
> Hello!
>
> Could anyone of you tell me, how to configure my Samba
> server to work with
> PPP interfaces?
> I have an Amiga machine running Samba v2.0.7. And a Windoze95 PC
> connected to it via null-modem cable.
> The problem is: Samba ignores all non-broadcast interfaces.
> So smbd and
>
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003 22:30:44 -0800 (PST)
Richard Sharpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Joey Collins wrote:
>
> > The SNIA definition of the data required for SMB_QUERY_FILE_ALL_INFO
> > does not appear to be correct. Furthermore, Ethereal's interpretation
> > does not seem righ
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
Abdul,
We saw your first posting. Please be patient.
Both smbd and nmbd run as root. All user interaction with the file system
is done as the user who initiated the process. Please refer to the source
code to see what happens. Samba has to ba able
Hi
Am noticing smbd processes are running as root and occassionally I see a
child process as userid
Just curios under what circumstances the smbd runs as user id process ( unix
id ) and running as root is a security risk?
Thanks in advance
-Abdul
-Original Message-
From: Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 11:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Samba processes
Hi
Am noticing smbd processes are running as root and occassionally I see a
child process as userid
J
Thanks John
Wondering y some smbd client connections show up as userid though parent is
root not all client connections are show up as root.
Is there a way to know when a client connection from windows side will shoup
as root or user id.
Thanks again
-Original Message-
From: John H Te
30 matches
Mail list logo
