On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 19:18, Andrew Furey wrote:
Hi all,
I never did get any replies to my original postings to this list (as
well as samba@), so I wrote my own patch. I just _know_ that there are
going to be several folks point out that this is a hack, and would never
survive an audit,
Related to the Allow chown of directories patch, I added a hack where
members of Admins, Domain Admins, or Enterprise Admins automatically
become admin users. (This really saved a lot of headaches for admins.)
Note that this sets conn-admin_user, but does *not* set uid to 0 or
force_user --
Andrew,
After being enlightened regarding the bigger picture, I have included
an alternate solution below that may be more appropriate, in addition to
my other comments.
I think there are several good reasons to include this fix:
1) I think the documentation is ambiguous on this subject.
+ if (strcmp(strerror(errno),Is a directory) == 0) {
+ fd = conn-vfs_ops.opendir(conn,dos_to_unix_static(fname));
+ }
This needs some serious flamage... Why can't you just use the errno
directly?
Because I couldn't find it :( The closest I could come was #21 (listed
in asm/errno.h), but
I've had several good trawls throuh the list archives for the samba-technical
and samba lists and this seems to be a frequently unanswered question :-)
Server is Solaris 8, samba server is a member of a Windows 2000 AD domain.
All unix (NIS) users are duplicated in the W2K domain. I've tried
On 19 Feb 2003 at 11:36, Martin Pool wrote:
On 18 Feb 2003, Ludolf Holzheid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the embedded/real time world, malloc() and friends are strongly
deprecated as you can't predict how long they will take. They have
to go through a linked list of unknown length and
Andrew Furey wrote:
Because I couldn't find it :( The closest I could come was #21 (listed
in asm/errno.h), but I couldn't confirm it - whenever I tried to access
the errno variable (by logging it) smbd would segfault :( My C is a bit
(OK, a lot) rusty...
I think you may have missed a
Hi,
I have played with this before. I did finally get it to work, but along
the way there are a few stumbling blocks.
I believe that Samba will only bind to interfaces that are UP at the
time of Samba starting. Tyically with PPP, the interface (ppp0) will
not be available (up) until a PPP
Hi all.
I am wondering if this is the correct forum for questions regarding
samba usage and management. If so, why does the 3.0Alpha21 swat tool no
give access to create masks or show entries for workgroup section? Other
than that - great work! I finally have been making some in roads as to
After merging libads/ldap.c from SAMBA_3_0 to my copy of 3.0a21 source code,
problem solved. Thanks.
Chere
On Tuesday 18 February 2003 02:18 pm, Chere Zhou wrote:
Hello,
I am using 3.0a21. If I use kinit user@DOMAIN with a user that does not
have privilege to join a machine into the
On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 00:17, Ken Cross wrote:
Related to the Allow chown of directories patch, I added a hack where
members of Admins, Domain Admins, or Enterprise Admins automatically
become admin users. (This really saved a lot of headaches for admins.)
Note that this sets
HI all,
here's a small fix for returning the correct sidtype in sid_to_uid() and
sid_to_gid()
this should be applied to all branches with the new uid - sid caching code
metze
-
Stefan metze Metzmacher [EMAIL
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 10:03:57PM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
HI all,
here's a small fix for returning the correct sidtype in sid_to_uid() and
sid_to_gid()
this should be applied to all branches with the new uid - sid caching code
No attachment - please try again.
Jeremy.
On 19 Feb 2003, Andrew Esh wrote:
It's probably a line count thing. The head of the patch contains a certain
range of lines that the patch should apply to. If you truncated the patch
at
the bottom, the header could be telling patch it needs to add, for
example,
30 lines, while the patch text
At 21:07 19.02.2003 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 10:03:57PM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
HI all,
here's a small fix for returning the correct sidtype in sid_to_uid() and
sid_to_gid()
this should be applied to all branches with the new uid - sid caching
HI all,
here's a small fix for
torture/vfstest.c
we should use conn_new() instead of use malloc()
metze
-
Stefan metze Metzmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -Npur --exclude=CVS --exclude=*.bak --exclude=*.o
sorry wrong subject...
At 22:31 19.02.2003 +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
HI all,
here's a small fix for
torture/vfstest.c
we should use conn_new() instead of use malloc()
metze
-
Stefan metze Metzmacher
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 10:20:35PM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
At 21:07 19.02.2003 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 10:03:57PM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
HI all,
here's a small fix for returning the correct sidtype in sid_to_uid() and
At 21:48 19.02.2003 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 10:20:35PM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
At 21:07 19.02.2003 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 10:03:57PM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
HI all,
here's a small fix for
On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 22:35, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
torture/vfstest.c
we should use conn_new() instead of use malloc()
Right! Applied.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
Tiny patch to produce useful error messages when krb5 configuration is
messed up.
(See attached file: clikrb5_error.patch)
Anthony Liguori
Linux/Active Directory Interoperability
Linux Technology Center (LTC) - IBM Austin
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (512) 838-1208
Tie Line: 678-1208
Sorry, list filter ate my patch.
Index: source/libsmb/clikrb5.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/samba/source/libsmb/clikrb5.c,v
retrieving revision 1.32
diff -u -r1.32 clikrb5.c
--- source/libsmb/clikrb5.c 19 Feb 2003 15:46:15 -
Hi,
I am currently engaged in a debate about the desirability of implementing
a real RO bit in our file system (we already have HIDDEN, SYSTEM, and
ARCHIVE bits). The problem with RO is that it requires some real
semantics, and you have to worry about UNIX semantics when files are
shared
Hi all,
there's a bad seg fault in HEAD (maybe in 3_0 too???)
since ~ 15.2.2003
I first thought that it was in my quota stuff
but today I tried a clean HEAD tree with the same result
here are my configure options:
./configure --with-acl-support \
--with-utmp \
--with-quotas \
To Samba Team,
Hi my name is Edward. Now I am learning Linuxand I want use samba to
replace NT Server. So every user can login to Linux. I try to follow
the step but I can't success. I don't know where I got wrong. This is my plan
I want to use samba to create a domain which call klc.
On 20 Feb 2003, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and the backtrace:
#0 0x40325079 in wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 0x4039d944 in __DTOR_END__ () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2 0x402c80e6 in system () from /lib/libc.so.6
#3 0x08183e8c in smb_panic (why=0x8221974 internal
What is the commit policy for 3.0? Should all changes be moved from
HEAD except ones that are explicitly too risky? Or only bug fixes?
What about documentation?
--
Martin
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 11:46:35AM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
What is the commit policy for 3.0? Should all changes be moved from
HEAD except ones that are explicitly too risky? Or only bug fixes?
What about documentation?
Use common sense :-). If it's a new/risky feature - add to HEAD only
To Samba Team,
Hi my name is Edward. Now I am learning Linuxand I want use samba to
replace NT Server. So every user can login to Linux. I try to follow
the step but I can't success. I don't know where I got wrong. This is my plan
I want to use samba to create a domain which call klc.
To Samba Team,
Hi my name is Edward. Now I am learning Linuxand I want use samba to
replace NT Server. So every user can login to Linux. I try to follow
the step but I can't success. I don't know where I got wrong. This is my plan
I want to use samba to create a domain which call klc.
To Samba Team,
Hi my name is Edward. Now I am learning Linuxand I want use samba to
replace NT Server. So every user can login to Linux. I try to follow
the step but I can't success. I don't know where I got wrong. This is my plan
I want to use samba to create a domain which call klc.
Richard:
Please define an appropriate ACL on the file.
Yes, it could have significant impact. Is there are problem with the
current way it's set (RO == owner r mode)?
Ken
Ken Cross
Network Storage Solutions
Phone 865.675.4070 ext 31
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Ken Cross wrote:
Richard:
Please define an appropriate ACL on the file.
That I am not sure of yet :-)
Yes, it could have significant impact. Is there are problem with the
current way it's set (RO == owner r mode)?
In our file system, UNIX permission bits are
Hi,
I am using samba on my both systems working as linux server
workstation in windows environment. I am able to access windows
machines in the network by both machines. And also I am able to
access linux server from Linux workstation but the reverse is not
working (accessing linux
After talking to Tim, I wanted to start committing to HEAD some test
harnesses that will exercise internal bits of Samba, such as
StrCaseCmp to start with.
These will be small C files that link to -lbigballofmud and allow
particular functions to be exercised from the command line, with a
view
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, John E. Malmberg wrote:
Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Ken Cross wrote:
Yes, it could have significant impact. Is there are problem with the
current way it's set (RO == owner r mode)?
That does not match the way it works on an NT server. And there is
36 matches
Mail list logo
