Port 445 is
Microsoft's direct SMB
over TCP (no NetBIOS in the middle) the preferred
method for
Windows 2000 and XP - should be a cleaner way to
work with, but I do not
know it well yet...
According to http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=204279
if I disable NetBios over TCP/IP on
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Poornima Marattil wrote:
hi ppl,
Need some help.
We usually put policy file in the netlogon dir.What if we have 15 to 20
This is possible, doe you have any problems in that area?
That is a BAD place to put them! Profiles should preferably go into a
separate
Michael Steffens wrote:
Hi Jeff,
Jeff Mandel wrote:
I found this is office 2000 v 9.3821 SR1 (not the latest)
We are trying to load the latest office update to see if that fixes
it first. Is anybody experiencing this with samba later than 9.4402
SR1 or on the latest version, whatever that is?
trace from 12327:
(gdb) bt
#0 0xfecd9794 in __sigprocmask () from /usr/lib/libthread.so.1
#1 0xfecce1e8 in _deliversigs () from /usr/lib/libthread.so.1
#2 0xfecd05c4 in thr_sigsetmask () from /usr/lib/libthread.so.1
#3 signal handler called
#4 0xb in ?? ()
#5 0xfecdb1f0 in usleep () from
Did you try to compile using OpenLDAP? I think that can
be a quick fix.
Otherwise, open a ticket with Sun?
Pierre B.
Jeff Mandel wrote:
trace from 12327:
(gdb) bt
#0 0xfecd9794 in __sigprocmask () from /usr/lib/libthread.so.1
#1 0xfecce1e8 in _deliversigs () from /usr/lib/libthread.so.1
#2
This is my first time I install Samba software.
How can I resolve the issue with the following error when invoking
./configure on an initial installation.
checking configure summary... WARNING: No automated network interface
determination
ERROR: no seteuid method available
configure: error:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter,
I'll take a look. I'm just reaally tied up on a few things at the moment.
I think i'm the one that put that code in. Thanks.
cheers, jerry
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Peter Hurley wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Ronan Waide wrote:
Hi folks,
mentioned this briefly on samba@ about a week ago, but I've actually
done some tracking on it now. I'm still digging, but this is a summary
of what I've found.
symptoms: doing rpcclient
On February 27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
try again with HEAD. The Samba 2-2 client rpc code cannot handle
fragmented PDU's too well.
Sorry, should have mentioned. This is with HEAD. Tim Potter has been
having a look at tcpdump plus a level ten debug trace of the rpcclient
run.
Cheers,
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 12:47:59AM -0800, D Jemms wrote:
Port 445 is
Microsoft's direct SMB
over TCP (no NetBIOS in the middle) the preferred
method for
Windows 2000 and XP - should be a cleaner way to
work with, but I do not
know it well yet...
According to
Isn't it up to libc to decide whether or not to use nscd? Or to nscd?
Afaik there is no way that samba can actually _know_ about nscd.
Jelmer
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 07:51:38AM -0800, Andrew Morgan wrote about 'samba not using
nscd (fwd)':
Reposting for the third time... Please let me know
Last round of changes to the Samba CLDAP code. Every byte is now
accounted for in the response packet so we shouldn't have anymore parsing
errors. It should apply cleanly against HEAD.
Index: source/utils/net_ads_cldap.c
===
RCS
This patch works for me. Thanks a lot!
But I do have to manually edit the file, because long lines got wrapped in
the email.
Chere
On Thursday 27 February 2003 12:20 pm, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Last round of changes to the Samba CLDAP code. Every byte is now
accounted for in the response
Hi All,
I was able to get 'winbind' configured on my Solaris-9 system and
authenticate Windows domain users, but I have three problems:
Server OS; Solaris 9, MU2
SAmba version: 2.2.7(also tried 2.2.8prel , but same problem)
Tried 'winbind enum users/groups' both true and false
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 05:10:12PM +, Ronan Waide wrote:
try again with HEAD. The Samba 2-2 client rpc code cannot handle
fragmented PDU's too well.
Sorry, should have mentioned. This is with HEAD. Tim Potter has been
having a look at tcpdump plus a level ten debug trace of the
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 01:38:50PM -0800, Chere Zhou wrote:
This patch works for me. Thanks a lot!
But I do have to manually edit the file, because long lines got wrapped in
the email.
There's a neat-o program called 'unwrapdiff' that can do all the
hard for for you. Under debian it is
That's what I thought too. Samba is not linked to any ldap libraries
itself, but something is triggering it to not use nscd. That's why I
mentioned the switch from user to root and back as a possibility. I don't
know enough about nscd under linux to say.
My guess is that this is being done by
I noticed that on samba 2.x, as root we can do smbpasswd -a -s user passwd
without being prompt of anything. This is not working on 3.0a21. I will
need to type in the password twice using the above command. Is this a
feature to not allow passwords to be seen, or a bug that should be fixed?
Hi there;
I have Samba-2.2.7a configured as PDC.
I can login from Windows9x, NT, 2K, XP. My problem is with executing
batch file at login time.
My logon. bat is:
net time \\linux /set /yes
net use n: \\linux\netlogon /no
net use h: \\linux\homes /no
net use p: \\linux\public /no
net use t:
Here's a quick patch to fix a few error codes in swat - return 500 on a
server error, not 400, and return 403 Forbidden instead of 400 Server
Error when attempting to access swat from a host not allowed by hosts
allow or hosts deny
Also a quick typo in a comment
Vance Lankhaar
Index: web/cgi.c
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Poornima Marattil wrote:
hi ppl,
Need some help.
We usually put policy file in the netlogon dir.What if we have 15 to 20
This is possible, doe you have any problems in that area?
That is a BAD place to put
21 matches
Mail list logo
