Charles Bueche wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> OK, I understand why this fix wasn't implemented as such, but still, my
> problem remain. Here is a copy of my post to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject is
> "Samba doesn't free network resource with XP clients", and the previous
> post, on 21.2.03, title "2.2.7a breaks
Luke Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>What is it that limit samba to root ? When I use samba with afs beeing root
>>will certenly not help samba access files, what else do samba need.
>
> SAMBA does need to bind to privileged ports.
Ok, sure. Now concentrate on the other issues :)
Its not th
>What is it that limit samba to root ? When I use samba with afs beeing root
>will certenly not help samba access files, what else do samba need.
SAMBA does need to bind to privileged ports.
-- Luke
--
Luke Howard | PADL Software Pty Ltd | www.padl.com
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 01:44:22AM +0100, Love wrote:
> >> - Using a keytab file would solve the problem below. Using /etc/krb5.keytab
> >> is bad idea, how about a own keytab for samba ? Doing hoops of strace stuff
> >> seems, well, strange.
> > Why is using /etc/krb5.keytab a bad idea? The onl
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 05:26:56AM +0100, Love wrote:
>
>> - Using a keytab file would solve the problem below. Using /etc/krb5.keytab
>> is bad idea, how about a own keytab for samba ? Doing hoops of strace stuff
>> seems, well, strange.
>
> Why is usi
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
> Okay, I understand the problem now.
>
> The problem is that W/9x boxes do not recognize the generic "*SMBSERVER"
> name in the NBT Session Setup Request. Also, W/9x boxes will send back an
> error if the called name is not correct in the NBT Ses
Okay, I understand the problem now.
The problem is that W/9x boxes do not recognize the generic "*SMBSERVER"
name in the NBT Session Setup Request. Also, W/9x boxes will send back an
error if the called name is not correct in the NBT Session Setup Request.
You should get a NEGATIVE SESSION RESPON
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "Christopher R. Hertel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> I'm working on providing a tree-style view of the network in a fashion similar
> to what Windows Explorer does. The top level of an SMB/CIFS network is
> something like "Microsoft Windows Networ
Hi,
The scenario I am testing is this:
- Open an MS word file from windows client A
- Disconnect the network cable from that windows client (emulate client
failure)
- Try to open the file from windows client B - file is locked.
- Wait a few minutes (see below - the exact time is the issue here)
-
"Christopher R. Hertel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Derrell,
>
> Can you give me a better idea of what you are trying to do?
>
> Above, you say you are trying to find all hosts that are members of a given
> workgroup. The question is: why? What is it that you are actually trying
> to accomplis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > "Christopher R. Hertel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> I am interested in looking into this, but I won't have time until the
> >> weekend.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > In the mean time, I have modified smbw_dir.c to include a new function
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 05:26:56AM +0100, Love wrote:
> - Using a keytab file would solve the problem below. Using /etc/krb5.keytab
> is bad idea, how about a own keytab for samba ? Doing hoops of strace stuff
> seems, well, strange.
Why is using /etc/krb5.keytab a bad idea? The only reason I've
>> Third problem is locally stored profiles. How I could make such set up that when
>> user logs out from WS , then WS
>> would copy changed profile back to server and delete it from WS ?
>> It's question of security and hard disk space..
> you can do that with a setting in gpedit.msc
> don't reme
Jim McDonough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As some of you may have noticed, the UL builds on the farm don't work. The
> culprit is the pre- 0.5 heimdal that is installed, as it doesn't have
> AP_OPTS_USE_SUBKEY, which is needed to do password changes. Unless someone
> knows how to accomplish pa
As some of you may have noticed, the UL builds on the farm don't work. The
culprit is the pre- 0.5 heimdal that is installed, as it doesn't have
AP_OPTS_USE_SUBKEY, which is needed to do password changes. Unless someone
knows how to accomplish password changes to a win KDC without it, we need
What about adding a value to the printing param? -> "printing =
disabled"
Though, I guess it would only have an effect when put in the global
section.
Vance Lankhaar
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 10:19, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In some recent work that I was doing, I detected that Samba uses a
> On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 13:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> [netlogon] share is like that:
>>
>> [netlogon]
>>comment = Network Logon Service
>>path = /home/samba/netlogon
>>guest ok = no
>>writable = no
>>browseable = yes
>>public = yes
> this is what i'm using ...
> [netlog
Hi,
In some recent work that I was doing, I detected that Samba uses a large
number of file descriptors before it even begins to do any useful work for
clients. The number is something like 27-29. The number is worse if smbd
is linked against any shared libs.
On a machine serving 1,000 clients
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> "Christopher R. Hertel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I am interested in looking into this, but I won't have time until the
>> weekend.
>
> ...
>
> In the mean time, I have modified smbw_dir.c to include a new function
> smbw_browse_workgroup_alternate() with the fo
Hello
I just compiled Samba-2.2.8pre2 on 4 different systems:
1) Solaris 7 + cc: WorkShop Compilers 5.0 98/12/15 C 5.0
2) Solaris 9 + cc: WorkShop Compilers 5.0 98/12/15 C 5.0
3) Solaris 9 + cc: Forte Developer 7 C 5.4 2002/03/09
4) IRIX 6.5 + MIPSpro Compilers: Version 7.30
It compiled OK on all
20 matches
Mail list logo
