At 18:37 10.03.2003 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 18:02, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> At 00:04 10.03.2003 -0600, Jeremy M. Dolan wrote:
> >Hi all.
> >
> >Management here wants to restrict users from deleting files via Samba.
> >NTFS is able to restrict just delete permis
Dear All,
I run the winbindd daemon, however the process
doesn't run. I don't know how to troubleshoot the winbindd
daemon. Does anyone help me how to configure and run it?
Below the logs I got when winbindd daemon executed but
process doesn't run in backroound...Please help. Many
thank
Hello,
I heard a following problem in Samba-JP.
The masked_match function in lib/access.c is wrong.(CVS HEAD and 2_2)
mask = (uint32)((ALLONES << atoi(slash + 1)) ^ ALLONES);
Example: hosts allow = 10.0.0.0/23
This produces following result. This isn't mask.
mask = 0111 11
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 18:02, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> At 00:04 10.03.2003 -0600, Jeremy M. Dolan wrote:
> >Hi all.
> >
> >Management here wants to restrict users from deleting files via Samba.
> >NTFS is able to restrict just delete permissions, but still allow new
> >files to be created
At 00:04 10.03.2003 -0600, Jeremy M. Dolan wrote:
Hi all.
Management here wants to restrict users from deleting files via Samba.
NTFS is able to restrict just delete permissions, but still allow new
files to be created and old ones changed. But I've come to the
conclusion this isn't possible with
Hi all.
Management here wants to restrict users from deleting files via Samba.
NTFS is able to restrict just delete permissions, but still allow new
files to be created and old ones changed. But I've come to the
conclusion this isn't possible with standard UNIX file permissions,
and unfortunately
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 08:36:56PM -0500, Scott Prive wrote:
> > > I'd like to contribute to such an effort -- or start one (using Perl).
> > > I have plenty of time for such a thing, while looking for a SQA job :-/.
> >
> > Well hopefully we can get something checked in so people can start
> > wo
On 9 Mar 2003, Scott Prive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Tim. So far, most of the tests I've seen in CVS are unit- or
> small-tests, but as a software tester I'm more interested in integration
> tests... which it sounds like you and Martin are working on.
Our framework is intended to event
> > I'd like to contribute to such an effort -- or start one (using Perl).
> > I have plenty of time for such a thing, while looking for a SQA job :-/.
>
> Well hopefully we can get something checked in so people can start
> working on it. I think we're on the right track with this version.
>
> T
On 8 Mar 2003, Andrew Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 21:20, Tim Potter wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 09:10:23PM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> >
> > > Is there any reason I should not apply this patch to Samba HEAD?
> >
> > I think the patch was eaten by Mailma
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 06:03:05PM -0500, Scott Prive wrote:
> I hope this is the correct forum to request this information...
>
> I'm looking for information on the Samba test and release process. I expect
> there's nothing formal like Mozilla, but is there a group or individual who
> has a prim
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 02:13:17PM -0500, Dave Collier-Brown wrote:
> For that last few years, I've been using a makefile
> to download and build samba, based on the instructions
> in http://us1.samba.org/samba/cvs.html
> These are the same instructions that we put in "Using Samba",
> and are
Check out http://build.samba.org - it has the build farm. If you'd like
to see what happens, check out the build_farm module from samba's cvs,
as described on http://pserver.samba.org/
Vance Lankhaar
On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 16:03, Scott Prive wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I hope this is the correct forum to
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 09:55, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 08:20:34AM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 08:05, Ronan Waide wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > * libsmb/smb_signing.c, libsmb/smbencrypt.c, Makefile.in,
> > > include/client.h, lib
Hello,
I hope this is the correct forum to request this information...
I'm looking for information on the Samba test and release process. I expect
there's nothing formal like Mozilla, but is there a group or individual who
has a primary focus of testing? I have some questions.
Is there a officia
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 08:20:34AM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 08:05, Ronan Waide wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > * libsmb/smb_signing.c, libsmb/smbencrypt.c, Makefile.in,
> > include/client.h, libsmb/cliconnect.c, libsmb/clientgen.c:
> > Change the way we sign
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 08:05, Ronan Waide wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> * libsmb/smb_signing.c, libsmb/smbencrypt.c, Makefile.in, include/client.h,
> libsmb/cliconnect.c, libsmb/clientgen.c:
> Change the way we sign SMB packets, to a function pointer interface.
>
> The intention is to
Hi folks,
* libsmb/smb_signing.c, libsmb/smbencrypt.c, Makefile.in, include/client.h,
libsmb/cliconnect.c, libsmb/clientgen.c:
Change the way we sign SMB packets, to a function pointer interface.
The intention is to allow for NTLMSSP and kerberos signing of packets, but
For that last few years, I've been using a makefile
to download and build samba, based on the instructions
in http://us1.samba.org/samba/cvs.html
These are the same instructions that we put in "Using Samba",
and are unchanged in the second edition.
Alas, they now only cause diagnostics, at l
On March 9, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> >
> > Uhmm... I'm not sure. So what do I do - create the share, create
> > empty directories like 'w32x86' and 'win40' and then issue a setdriver
> > RPC?
>
> Well, I tried that, does not work, I get:
>
> SetPrinter call failed!
> result was NT_STATUS_UNSU
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 04:26:58PM +0200, Tom Alsberg wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 03:21:00PM +0100, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > I think that would be the 'setdriver' command from rpcclient - Tim,
> > does that sound correct?
>
> Uhmm... I'm not sure. So what do I do - create the share, crea
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 03:21:00PM +0100, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 01:27:50PM +0200, Tom Alsberg wrote about 'Printer driver
> parameter deprecated - what now?':
> >
>
> I think that would be the 'setdriver' command from rpcclient - Tim,
> does that sound correct?
Uhmm.
> Hallo all,
>
> there are a lot of pretty good ideas in the new samba release. Ive
> installed it today and got some questions:
>
> 1. What do you mean with "support for migrating from a Windows NT 4.0
> domain"
> - what are the tools for that
> - how do i the migration ?
>
> 2. I t
Hi there.
I wanted long already to get into automatic determination and
downloading of printer drivers for Windows. I notice now that the
'printer driver' parameter is specified as deprecated in the manual
page of smb.conf (was long already so, probably, but only now I really
checked exactly). I
Hi there.
This question might have confused the last time I sent it, because I
did not provide much details in the same message. I hope you have
answers or ideas to discuss about at least some of the questions I am
asking here.
So - this is Windows NT, 2000, and XP, with a solution for XP being
25 matches
Mail list logo