On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 01:12, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Right, XATTRs would be one way to do it on Linux. Of course, Samba needs
some mods, and Tridge was looking at putting that into his NTVFS layer
(where it belongs).
Hi,
It will not work.
For example XFS has maximum length for them: 64 KB.
Hi,
I remember some time ago several people were discussing about putting
the Hidden, System, Archive, Read-Only bits in EAs.
Has it been done in 3.0?
Will it be in 2.2.x serie?
Regards,
Olaf Frczyk
On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 01:36, Jianliang Lu wrote:
On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 23:08, Jianliang Lu wrote:
Hi,
I'm working to complete the account policy that today worked only for
min
password len. The first patch is for tne min passwod age, than
others...
Now pdbedit is also
On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 08:12, Martin Pool wrote:
On 20 Mar 2003, Richard Sharpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Martin Pool wrote:
I just noticed this in the libc manual.
http://www.gnu.org/manual/glibc-2.2.5/html_node/Backtraces.html
It could be pretty cool
On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 09:44, Olaf Frczyk wrote:
Hi,
I remember some time ago several people were discussing about putting
the Hidden, System, Archive, Read-Only bits in EAs.
Has it been done in 3.0?
No, not yet. It will be available on on system the supports EAs btw, so
we need to make
Now I patched in the place that Andrew wondered.
Jianliang Lu
TieSse s.p.a.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- samba-3.0alpha22/source/passdb/pdb_get_set.cFri Mar 21 11:25:35 2003
+++ samba-3.0alpha22/source/passdb/pdb_get_set.c.fixFri Mar 21 11:25:27 2003
@@ -1064,6 +1064,7 @@
we have 2 NT40-SP6a Servers, on as PDC, one as BDC togehter with Samba
2.4.7a in on Network Segment. All the user-accounts are on the PDC - so we
use winbind. The samba server should work as BDC in that domain an hold the
profiles an the homes. Everythin works mostly but sometimes the clients dont
Greetings,
I have samba setup on redhat linux with active
directory server in place.How do I generate
LsaLookupnames and LsaLookupSid RPCs ? What operation
to carry from win2k client to generate these RPC?
-DJ
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum -
when i use winbind to connect a samba server to an existing nt-domain what i
have to do:
a) create a workstation account (unix+samba account) for every workstation
in the domain manualy
b) the workstation account dos not matter because that is handled by the PDC
c) configure winbind (or rpc) to
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 02:18:24PM +0100, Operator (SCHMIEDER it-solutions) wrote
about 'winbind and workstation account':
when i use winbind to connect a samba server to an existing nt-domain what i
have to do:
a) create a workstation account (unix+samba account) for every workstation
in
Hallo Jelmer,
thank you for that very fast answer. I checked that but i did not findout a
solution. I the script i called that commands:
useradd -s /bin/false -d /dev/null machine_name\$
passwd -l machine_name\$
smbpasswd -a -m machine_name
Without success
Do you have an example for
I am in search of a method of backing up open files on Windows machines, using
Samba or libsmbclient on a Linux machine. I've heard rumors of a Backup
Interface in the network protocols, which allows backing up open files when a
normal open() would fail), but have not been able to find any
Thanks to pointers from Andrew Bartlett, I redid my samsync
sam_account_from_delta patch a little more sanely. Now it only marks
as changed things which have actually changed. This patch is against
current HEAD. The STRING_CHANGED macro and general style of the
additions is copied from
This makes samsync tell you what record types it's skipping, rather
than just dumping out the number corresponding to the type. It also
prints the database type instead of database 1, database 2, database
3.
Cheers,
Waider.
Index: utils/net_rpc_samsync.c
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 09:44:26AM +0100, Olaf Fr±czyk wrote:
Hi,
I remember some time ago several people were discussing about putting
the Hidden, System, Archive, Read-Only bits in EAs.
Has it been done in 3.0?
Will it be in 2.2.x serie?
Not done for 2.2., I'm thinking about it for
Even I don't know any rpc client program for win2k .
But the problem :what sequence of operations generate
these RPC when perforemd from win2k client.
-DJ
--- Jelmer Vernooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 05:07:46AM -0800, D Jemms
wrote about 'Lsa RPC':
Greetings,
I
Green, Paul wrote:
However, on a chip that does distinguish areas of
virtual memory that are code, and areas that are data, and further disallows
execution of data (absent a specific operating system call to change the
access mode of that region of virtual memory), it seems to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, Andrew ( the rest :-)
I took some minutes to extract two sets of changes from HEAD and made
them suitable for 3_0 (to make merging easier for you):
* pdb_getgr** in mapping.c
* pdb_guest.c
You only have to add pdb_guest.c after applying this
Quite some stuff. When viewing the owner of a file, your workstation
needs to do a lookup of the sid one way or another. If you're using a
domain, one of these RPC's will be issued to your DC.
Jelmer
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 09:00:36AM -0800, D Jemms wrote about 'Re: Lsa RPC':
Even I don't know
On Sat, 2003-03-22 at 06:15, Matt Peterson wrote:
Hi,
In situations where people are operating in a kerberized environment where
Win2k is the KDC, machine objects will have already been created for machines
that are participating in the kerberos realm.
Am I wrong in thinking that
Yes. This is a problem. In the past I have favored a 'krb5 keytab
write' option that would write our password out into the standard
keytab, but there were good reasons not to. The problem is, I can't
remember what they were. Mostly 'if somebody changed our password under
us' stuff.
Hmm, why
Andrew,
On Friday 21 March 2003 03:12 pm, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Sat, 2003-03-22 at 06:15, Matt Peterson wrote:
Hi,
In situations where people are operating in a kerberized environment
where Win2k is the KDC, machine objects will have already been created
for machines that are
On Sat, 2003-03-22 at 09:13, Luke Howard wrote:
Yes. This is a problem. In the past I have favored a 'krb5 keytab
write' option that would write our password out into the standard
keytab, but there were good reasons not to. The problem is, I can't
remember what they were. Mostly 'if
IIRC there's more about this in the docs. I think the add user script
was only supposed to create the unix account.
Jelmer
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 02:42:39PM +0100, Operator (SCHMIEDER it-solutions) wrote
about 'winbind and workstation account':
Hallo Jelmer,
thank you for that very fast
Re: build farm errors for Stratus VOS on head and 3.0.
I would be grateful if whomever added a reference to FALSE to line 31 of
passdb/pdb_interface.c would change it to False. The latter is the POSIX
name for the macro; the former is non-POSIX. Or grant me ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
cvs access and
Simo Sorce wrote:
It would be really nice to have this feature!
90% of time I attach a gdb to get a backtrace, it wuold also speed up
development imho.
The interception of the signal by smb_panic() disables this feature on
OpenVMS.
If the operating system has a build in backtrace handler, it is
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 06:59:03PM -0500, Green, Paul wrote about '[pseudo-patch]
passdb/pdb_interface.c':
Re: build farm errors for Stratus VOS on head and 3.0.
I would be grateful if whomever added a reference to FALSE to line 31 of
passdb/pdb_interface.c would change it to False. The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, Andrew!
Thinking twice and arguing with you sometimes really helps. Thanks!
This is my second attempt that is a lot more robust and less
intrusive.
I'm really amazed how picky LDAP really is.
Volker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version:
Paul Green wrote about potential vulnerabilities in getting a stack
overflow to execute arbitrary code by an attacker.
Many hardware platforms do have the protection that you describe, but it
depends on the software to set up the protection.
Also someone would need to have intimate knowlege of
On Sat, 2003-03-22 at 11:21, Volker Lendecke wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, Andrew!
Thinking twice and arguing with you sometimes really helps. Thanks!
This is my second attempt that is a lot more robust and less
intrusive.
This looks *much* better. Thanks!
Hi
The 3.0alpha22 does not seem to execute the add user script when running
as security = domain. The same configuration used to work fine with samba
2.2.7
I am making samba as the member of the domain and have users store their
files to the home shares on the samba, so that I need to have add
On Sat, 2003-03-22 at 02:21, A. S. wrote:
John H Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, A. S. wrote:
Correct. When you configure samba with security = domain you re telling
it to be a domain member server. Domain members do NOT provide the
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, A. S. wrote:
Hi
The 3.0alpha22 does not seem to execute the add user script when running
as security = domain. The same configuration used to work fine with samba
2.2.7
Correct. When you configure samba with security = domain you re telling
it to be a domain member
John H Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, A. S. wrote:
Correct. When you configure samba with security = domain you re telling
it to be a domain member server. Domain members do NOT provide the
netlogon service nor do they partake in domain
34 matches
Mail list logo
