Following up my post on 4.March.2003 reporting ./configure failure on DU
4.0D for Samba 2.2.8pre2 --with-pam, I have now configured & compiled
2.2.8pre2 --with-winbind (but no PAM), and want to report the selection of
scary warnings that the Compaq C compiler throws up by default.
The following is
I decided to have a look at 2.2.8pre2 on a Digital Unix box we run here -
and "configure" runs fine like this :
./configure --with-winbind
...
checking whether or not getgroups returns EGID too many times... no
checking whether struct passwd has pw_comment... yes
checking wheth
Dirk,
> Several times I like to connect my WinXP client to the Fileserver and I
can
> see him but I cannot the directories how does it comes ??
[...]
> Samba 2.0.4 fileserver
1) the "samba-technical" list is for discussion of Samba *development*
issues, primarily by the Samba developers themsel
On 19 Feb 2003, Andrew Esh wrote:
> It's probably a line count thing. The head of the patch contains a certain
> range of lines that the patch should apply to. If you truncated the patch
at
> the bottom, the header could be telling patch it needs to add, for
example,
> 30 lines, while the patch te
ision 1.16.4.37
diff -u -u -p -r1.16.4.36 -r1.16.4.37
rediff: Not supported: -{
OK - I give up for now ... hlp :(
[sorry .. for all this trouble over such a minor thing]
Nick Boyce
EDS Southwest Solution Centre, Bristol, UK
-----Original Message-
From: 'Martin Pool' [mailto:[
On 7 Feb 2003, Martin Poole wrote:
> On 7 Feb 2003, "Boyce, Nick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks - that was it. I now have a script /usr/local/bin/winbind, which
>> does
>> umask 000
>> /etc/init.d/winbind $1
>
> You would be bet
On 7 Feb 2003, Martin Pool wrote:
>
> On 7 Feb 2003, "Boyce, Nick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks - that was it. I now have a script /usr/local/bin/winbind, which
>> does
>>umask 000
>>/etc/init.d/winbind $1
>>uma
On 7 Feb 2003, Martin Pool wrote:
>
> On 6 Feb 2003, "Boyce, Nick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I find what seems to be an
>> obvious, simple and annoying buggette - if I stop and restart winbind
(the
>> sort of thing you do a lot at this
As per my message an hour or so ago, I'm trying to get the winbind that
comes with Debian 3.0 Samba 2.2.3a-12 configured to allow me to telnet into
the box with authentication handed off to a real NT domain.
Anyway, even before I really get started, I find what seems to be an
obvious, simple and a
On 6th.Feb.2003 Szilva wrote :
>> 2. What version of samba are you running?
> The version is "2.2.3a-6 for Debian" that was shipped with
> distribution (Woody).
On behalf of yourself, your users, and Net users everywhere in general :),
can I plead with you to install the later security-fixed ver
On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 19:55 PM, Jim Morris wrote:
> I must say that I know of no NT/2000 option to allow only login from
> one client PC, although I recall Netware having such an option.
Agreed again. (I think you meant something different from the facility John
Terpestra referre
[this is almost too trivial to bother with, but in the interests of accuracy
..]
I just converted a Samba 2.2.3a-for-Debian server from being a stand-alone
workgroup member using plain-text passwords into a full NT-administered
domain member using encrypted passwords and security=domain. This bei
[sorry - bit of a belated reply - I have a bit of a backlog to read]
On 23rd.Oct.2002, Linda Walsh asked :
> I recently upgraded my Linux distro to SuSE 8.1 which
> came w/samba 2.2.5.
>
> A feature of the upgrade was that it 'split' the startup
> script for samba from 1 script for _smb_ & _nmb_
Reading through Jeremy's eagerly awaited discourse on oplocks/share
modes/locking, I read this bit :
> ... if you need simultaneous
> file access from a Windows and UNIX client you *must* have an
> application that is written to lock records correctly on both
> sides. Few applications are written
Jordan Mack asked :
> over 6MB/s from the Linux server to my Win2K machine, but when
> sending a file from Win2K to Linux I'll be very lucky to get 2MB/s.
> FTP transfers work great both ways at about 8MB/s.
>
> I've seen a few list entries about this, but I couldn't find one that
> found a s
em data (he still hasn't said what hardware architecture
he's working on though).
Nick Boyce
EDS, Bristol, UK
-Original Message-
From: san [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 July 2002 17:27
To: Boyce, Nick
Subject: Re: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer
target-samba-3.0-al
Lars,
If you're talking about :
* poor performance with PC -> Samba transfers
* good performance with Samba to PC transfers
then you may also want to review your setting for the "write raw" smb.conf
parameter. For some bizarre reason several people have reported that this
needs to be set
17 matches
Mail list logo
