Re: PIPE BUSY

2003-01-27 Thread Dave Aitel
74 > USA > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Phone: (207) 885-5565 > IBM tie-line: 776-9984 > > > >

Re: PIPE BUSY

2003-01-27 Thread Dave Aitel
Hmmm. I still can't do it, but I think I can do the writex thing...:> -dave On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:13:04 -0600 (CST) "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Dave Aitel

Re: PIPE BUSY

2003-01-24 Thread Dave Aitel
request? (I'd use 3.0 but I can't get it compiled. :<) Also looking for an example of Samba doing an RPC request via WriteX. -dave On Sat, 25 Jan 2003 09:14:51 +1100 Tim Potter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 12:34:44PM -0500, Dave Aitel wrote: > &g

PIPE BUSY

2003-01-24 Thread Dave Aitel
Has anyone been able to send a DCE-RPC PDU fragment via SMBTrans? I seem to be getting PIPE BUSY as the SMB response from the Win2K server I'm testing against. (I'm writing a DCE-RPC over SMB Named Pipes fuzzer for SPIKE) -dave