While convenient for web browsers, it's not exactly backwards-compatible for both GPG
and the average sysadmin who's probably struggling with verifying PGP signatures for
the first time. It's not Samba's fault; GPG just isn't very descriptive in it's error
message, which is somewhat misleading.
gpg: Signature made Wed Dec 11 07:38:39 2002 PST using DSA key ID 2F87AF6F
gpg: Good signature from "Samba Distribution Verification Key
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
This was tested using GnuPG 1.2.1 on bash 2.05a.
Regards,
- David Lechnyr
