what is the difficulty upgrading in your environment, just curios
-Original Message-
From: dowlime [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 1:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Request - security patch for 2.0.6
Is there a plan for a patch for 2.0.6 to address the securit
Terpstra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 1:49 PM
To: Javid Abdul-AJAVID1
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] RE: Samba processes
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
Abdul,
We saw your first posting. Please be patient.
Both smbd
-Original Message-
From: Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 11:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Samba processes
Hi
Am noticing smbd processes are running as root and occassionally I see a
child process as userid
Hi
Am noticing smbd processes are running as root and occassionally I see a
child process as userid
Just curios under what circumstances the smbd runs as user id process ( unix
id ) and running as root is a security risk?
Thanks in advance
-Abdul
resending, if any one knows the appreciate a brief answer.
thanks again
-Original Message-
From: Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 [mailto:AJAVID1@;motorola.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Error code 0
Hi I have samba authentication issue
Hi I have samba authentication issue.
Erorring is as follows:
rejecting user, auth failed
domain_client_validtea: unable to validate apssword for user --- in doman
--- to domian controllaer ---. Error was code 0.
Just wondering what could be code0.
Is there a doc for smb error codes where i ca
23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: load balancing question
Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
> Why dont we chose a mechanism to connect to the host itself
> like static dns rounrobin ,each connection will round robin'ed'
> or some dynamic round robin utilies
Well, you are the on
Why dont we chose a mechanism to connect to the host itself
like static dns rounrobin ,each connection will round robin'ed'
or some dynamic round robin utilies
-Original Message-
From: John E. Malmberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 9:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Good load balancing utility would be lsf , which is dynamic but not free i
suppose, others would BIND static round robin
any more suggestions :-)))
-Original Message-
From: John E. Malmberg
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10/5/02 10:03 PM
Subject: Re: load balancing question
Stephan Stapel
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 5:47 PM
To: Javid Abdul-AJAVID1; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Port 139 versus Port 445
I suspect that you can have two smbd's running. Each one will spawn other
daemons as needed, I THINK.
Joel
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 05:41:39PM
Hi
whats the best way to upgrade samba, am currently running 2.0.7 and would
like to upgrade to 2.2.5,
the machine account is now moved to secrets.tdb, can i simply move the
existing machine SID to private directory in new version
or i have delete the old one and and rejoin samba again
thanks in
yes, i agree with Eric,
I havent had any issues as long as unix accunt exist in nis domain, and
samba is memeber server in nt domain
my setup, solaris6, samba 2 0 7 and 2 2 5, clients w2k
-Original Message-
From: Eric Boehm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:2
Hi
User is complaining about slow ness
they copy images ISO from unix storage to PC and then burn dvd and cds.
the typical size of each image is 600MB
they do it 4 to 5 at once
am running samba on solaris which acts gateway to nfs stored images.
i have no option of installing samba on local st
what mistake, can you plz elaborate
thanks
-Original Message-
From: James Leone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 2:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Javid Abdul-AJAVID1; 'Richard Sharpe'; Dan Shearer;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SORRY - MY MISTA
Thanks, appreciate your feedback
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 2:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ALERT - POSSIBLE SAMBA BLOCK IN WIN 2K SP3 - feedback
I am running several versions of samba [2.2.3, 2.2.5,
am just curious why its going for port 445 ?
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sharpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 2:20 PM
To: Christopher R. Hertel
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Win2K resetting connections. Is there a service pack?
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002,
I really appreciate all your responses on this.
I might not have fixed it by looking at samba logs but i noticed there was
directory in user unix directory with wildcard * as folder name
once i removed it, samba showed up all the files and directory.
am not sure what would * as folder name cau
interoperability
thanks for your patience for reading all this
-Original Message-
From: John Benedetto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 6:09 PM
To: Javid Abdul-AJAVID1; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Samba] Desktop.ini and samba - Please comment
--On Wednesday
Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 5:30 PM
To: Javid Abdul-AJAVID1
Cc: 'Bradley W. Langhorst'; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Desktop.ini and samba - Please comment
Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
>
> thanks
> but why do you thi
thanks
but why do you think samba is looking for it
-Original Message-
From: Bradley W. Langhorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 5:22 PM
To: Javid Abdul-AJAVID1
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Desktop.ini and samba - Please
exactly, because its not causing to every unix user who is mapping
but just curious why samba is looking for it
-Original Message-
From: Green, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 5:06 PM
To: 'Javid Abdul-AJAVID1'; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTE
I was just wondering why does samba look for Desktop.ini when i am mapping
to my home directory from w2k
running samba 2.2.5 on sol2.6 , client is w2k
am troubleshooting an weird issue where am not able to see all my unix home
directory files on w2k
log level10 is showing me that samba is look
31, 2002 11:33 AM
To: Javid Abdul-AJAVID1
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Samba and CIFS question
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 09:20:03AM -0500, Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
:
> > Is samba implments CIFS.
Yes, Samba is a CIFS implementation.
> > I thought CIFS is
Its security thing
you configure samba for user security with encryption set to no i guess
you have to change it to domain or change the registry on windows 2k to send
passsword in clear text
-Original Message-
From: BIANCARDI, ROBERTO [R&D/0467]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday
am exhausted for solving this.
using samba2.0.7 and 2.2.5 in 5000 nis/nis+ and win2k domain environment
samba member server in domain giving access to nfs home directories
everything working smooth since last 3 years
lately couple of users unix home directory are not completely listed when
se
> Hi all,
> Is samba implments CIFS.
> I thought CIFS is based on SMB
> am assuming SMB is opensource protocol
> Just wondering if am running samba 2.2.5 does it mean am running CIFS
> also what version of CIFS?
> when i sniffing SMB packets which commands should i be looking at CIFS or
SMB
26 matches
Mail list logo
