samba cluster active-active configuration.

Hi all, Sorry for posting this one here, I guess it is a bit out of topic, But I tried about 4 or 5 other mailing lists - no luck yet. I'm trying to configure my samba on a RedHat AS 2.1, to run in an active-active configuration. The "Red Hat Cluster Manager Installation and Administration Guide"

RE: Question - Latest security alery of samba

:-) I guess my only proof could be Jeremy. Jeremy knows me a bit. I gave him a little help with one of the latest fixes in 2.2.8 (delete on close). Appreciate your help, Nir Livni -Original Message- From: Richard Sharpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2003 8:06 PM To

RE: Question - Latest security alery of samba

] Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2003 4:31 PM To: Nir Livni; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Question - Latest security alery of samba On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 04:27:04PM +0200, Nir Livni wrote: > Hi all, > Just wanted to know if the latest security alert is all about > quotas.c. An upgrade (for

Question - Latest security alery of samba

Hi all, Just wanted to know if the latest security alert is all about quotas.c. An upgrade (for me) is a bit problematic at the moment. If I patch this specific source code myself and recompile smbd - is it (basically) enough ? Thanks, Nir

do_lock may return uninitialized status

Title: Message samba-2.2.7   if the following condition is false   if (OPEN_FSP(fsp) && fsp->can_lock && (fsp->conn == conn)) . . .   then the return value is uninitialized

RE: delete on close problems(Content Filtered by PrivateArk)

s the file. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 7:00 PM To: Nir Livni Cc: 'Simo Sorce'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: delete on close problems(Content Filtered by PrivateArk) On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 03:14:51PM +0

delete on close problems - more info

-From: Nir Livni Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 2:49 PMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: delete on close problems I've noticed that if user A has opened a file with GENERIC_READ ,      SHARE_READ

RE: delete on close problems(Content Filtered by PrivateArk)

. -Original Message- From: Simo Sorce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 3:03 PM To: Nir Livni Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: delete on close problems(Content Filtered by PrivateArk) On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 13:48, Nir Livni wrote: > if user B opens the file

delete on close problems

Title: Message I've noticed that if user A has opened a file with GENERIC_READ ,      SHARE_READ | SHARE_DELETE ,      FILE_FLAG_DELETE_ON_CLOSE   then user B canno

RE: fsp->modified - What's it for ?

Anyone ? Please ? -Original Message-From: Nir Livni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:33 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: fsp->modified - What's it for ? I am using samba-2.2.1a   I was wondering what is the usage of the f

fsp->modified - What's it for ?

I am using samba-2.2.1a   I was wondering what is the usage of the field fsp->modified. I saw it is changed to True when I write to a file, but does not change when I truncate a file. Moreover - It is never checked for its content.   Thanks, Nir