ion would be free of
the hoops imposed by drivers & show add printer wizard goofiness.
Thanks,
Peter Hurley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 8:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Samba] print
till at the rpcclient prompt) to associate the
printer share with the driver.
For example,
setdriver "hp2200" "HP LaserJet 2200 Series PCL 6"
Now automatic driver download should work.
This process was so painful, eventually I'm going to look at the
Imprints pa
the guest user?
2) Is it possible to have multiple child smbds servicing one W2k
workstation? If so, under what conditions? I can only get it to use
the same negotiated session key over and over again.
Thanks,
Peter Hurley
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Peter Hurley
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 3:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Question about srv_spoolss_send_event_to_client()
In rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c:srv_spoolss_send_event_to_client():
Could
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Peter Hurley
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 2:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bug fix?: 2.2.7a, printing/printing.c, print_queue_resume()
With W2k workstation and Samba print server running LPRng
al WINS server included as one of the multiple
NMBD servers) in smb.conf to support fail-over to other WINS servers.
Also, then the semantics of "interfaces=" would not be overloaded since
they would be in separate configurations. Just a thought...
This is mostly just a logical separation though, since a similar
separation can be achieved with the "-s config file" command-line
option. Although it seems pretty complicated to run multiple NMBD
servers on a single machine (like making sure they're each using
different "lock directory=" settings, for example).
Thanks,
Peter Hurley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ausing).
Commenting out the lines of code above had the desired effect (i.e.,
fixed that problem), but I'm concerned since someone put it in to begin
with.
If the above is absolutely necessary, then the fix is much more
complicated.
Thanks,
Peter Hurley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please disregard this stale e-mail. It has been subsumed by "bug fix?:
2.2.7a, nmbd/nmbd_packets.c, listen_for_packets()"
Thanks,
Peter Hurley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
t;port));
free_packet(packet);
} else {
/* Save the file descriptor this packet came in on. */
packet->fd = sock_array[i];
queue_packet(packet);
}
Thanks,
Peter Hurley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PS - I don't have a development environment or I would have changed this
myself and tested it.
hread, "How Samba let us down"? Quite
a furor: interestingly, Chris de Vidal states in his e-mail of 23
October 2002, 10:46:29, "I did try WINS in testing; I would see
"WINS server appears to be down"...Have you seen better documents on
implementing Samba WINS..."
I think in this situation a small change could go a long way.
Thanks,
Peter Hurley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ause is_local_net() is used in two other places, both of
which are looking for DMB (one in smbd/password.c and one in
nsswitch/winbinddd_cm.c). It's unclear to me what the side effects
would be here.
BTW, similar logic exists for the 138 handler in the same function. I'm
not sure whether that is cause for concern and if it should be fixed
like the 137 handler above.
Thanks,
Peter Hurley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
e get flushed after a queue resume
with:
print_cache_flush(snum);
This is what's done in print_queue_pause().
I'm not sure if a similar condition exists for print_queue_purge(). I
was going to go check that out next.
Thanks,
Peter Hurley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PS - Did anyone see m
Samba,
I can't shed more light on the problem or this is a more isolated
circumstance than I think and not cause for much concern.
I also want to take this opportunity to say thank you to the core Samba
team and other significant contributors to Samba. Thanks for a great
product, hard work and
13 matches
Mail list logo
