On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 01:56:45PM +0200, Michael Steffens wrote:
the attached enhancements of SID related debug messages were quite
useful for me for tracking down where strange SIDs winbindd
complained about are coming from.
Being there I found that my suspicous SIDs are included in the
I was poking around in the segv signal handling code today as I'm in a
situation where an actual core dump would be handy to have.
The intent of the current code looks like core dumps are to be made in
$LOGDIR/corefiles but the dump_core() function is never executed as the
argument to
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 09:41:55PM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Tim Potter wrote:
I was poking around in the segv signal handling code today as I'm in a
situation where an actual core dump would be handy to have.
The intent of the current code looks like core
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 12:37:33PM -0500, Roylance, Stephen D. wrote:
I'm trying to use some of the functions in winbind_nss.c in my winbind_aix.c
module. It compiles, but when I try to link it fill_pwent is unresolved.
What do I need to link against in order to get fill_pwent and such from
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 02:12:17PM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
Hi Tim,
why did you remove SID_NAME_NONE
vars from type 'enum SID_NAME_USE' should be initialize with SID_NAME_NONE
I removed it because it wasn't used anywhere!
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 03:01:58PM -0800, Orwig, Paul wrote:
[...]
My fix is neither pretty nor proper.
What is needed to fix the configure script to handle HPUX 11.0 properly??
I'd love to know as well. Can you send me the output of config.log in
private mail?
Tim.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 03:46:59PM -0500, Ken Cross wrote:
Yes, to support it properly, the underlying filesystem should include
all streams when you cp/mv/rm/... And a portable backup/restore could
be interesting!
However, I'm having trouble getting Samba to return goofy names like
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 11:28:33PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, to support it properly, the underlying filesystem should include
all streams when you cp/mv/rm/... And a portable backup/restore could
be interesting!
However, I'm having trouble getting Samba to return goofy
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 04:09:19PM +1030, Adam Fox wrote:
When I ran configure the following was reported about the printf functions:
checking for asprintf declaration... no
checking for vasprintf declaration... no
checking for vsnprintf declaration... yes
checking for snprintf
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 11:22:54AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i tried to compile the current CVS today and found a typo and missing
arguments.
i append a small diff, that fixes these problems..
Hi - someone forgot their janitorial duties with regard to the
smbwrapper support. I've
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 06:03:05PM -0500, Scott Prive wrote:
I hope this is the correct forum to request this information...
I'm looking for information on the Samba test and release process. I expect
there's nothing formal like Mozilla, but is there a group or individual who
has a primary
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 02:13:17PM -0500, Dave Collier-Brown wrote:
For that last few years, I've been using a makefile
to download and build samba, based on the instructions
in http://us1.samba.org/samba/cvs.html
These are the same instructions that we put in Using Samba,
and are
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 08:36:56PM -0500, Scott Prive wrote:
I'd like to contribute to such an effort -- or start one (using Perl).
I have plenty of time for such a thing, while looking for a SQA job :-/.
Well hopefully we can get something checked in so people can start
working on
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 09:10:23PM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Is there any reason I should not apply this patch to Samba HEAD?
I think the patch was eaten by Mailman. Please re-send as text/plain.
Without even seeing the patch (-: it's definitely a good idea.
Tim.
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 05:39:25PM +, Ronan Waide wrote:
using setdriver in rpcclient wasn't working for me, so I traced
execution and discovered that it uses open_printer_ex with an access
level of MAXIMUM_ALLOWED_ACCESS. This only grants me read access to
the printer when I am in fact a
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 10:25:27PM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
This seems like a good way to do it. Does anyone have any objections if I
do so?
Why do we need it? Just call lp_default_server_announce() and check if
the SV_TYPE_PRINTQ_SERVER bit is set. If no print
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 06:54:37AM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Vance Lankhaar wrote:
What about adding a value to the printing param? - printing =
disabled
This seems like a good way to do it. Does anyone have any objections if I
do so?
Why do we need it? Just
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 10:10:53PM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
This seems like a good way to do it. Does anyone have any objections if I
do so?
Why do we need it? Just call lp_default_server_announce() and check if
the SV_TYPE_PRINTQ_SERVER bit is set. If no print shares are
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 05:10:12PM +, Ronan Waide wrote:
try again with HEAD. The Samba 2-2 client rpc code cannot handle
fragmented PDU's too well.
Sorry, should have mentioned. This is with HEAD. Tim Potter has been
having a look at tcpdump plus a level ten debug trace
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 01:38:50PM -0800, Chere Zhou wrote:
This patch works for me. Thanks a lot!
But I do have to manually edit the file, because long lines got wrapped in
the email.
There's a neat-o program called 'unwrapdiff' that can do all the
hard for for you. Under debian it is
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 10:21:04PM +0100, Juergen Hasch wrote:
actually it looks quite good :-)
That's good to hear!
Attached is a capture from two W2K machines talking to each other.
Packet No. 19 shows the NT NOTIFY response packet.
This capture was made using the Windows version of
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 10:24:57AM -0800, Herb Lewis wrote:
Isn't the second check for newline redundant?
Looks like it to me.
Only redundant if we can guarentee that the cmd string will only have
one \n at the end and no other ones embeded in the string. I don't
know enough about
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 10:47:38AM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote:
Scenario: Fresh compile of Samba 3.0, both a20 and a21. Attempt to use attached
smb.conf.
EXANET-QA is a part of the EXANET-IL domain (e.g - EXANET-IL is the parent domain).
EXANET-QA is supposedly set in compatibility mode.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 04:26:21PM -0500, Michael B. Allen wrote:
This is set at compile-time, not run-time. This line:
#define FD_SETSIZE 2048 /* Max # of winbindd connections */
must occur before the first invocation of sys/types.
This could be a build option, but it might
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 10:23:14PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Better still why not use poll() instead of select() in the winbindd
main loop?
Because not everyone has poll() :-(. Some have poll build on select.
Some people have poll() and it doesn't work So many bugs, so
little
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 12:44:54PM -0500, Ken Cross wrote:
You may or may not have noticed, but wbinfo -m doesn't work on
SAMBA_3_0, and -u or -g don't return users/groups from trusted domains.
The problem was in winbindd_util.c. init_domain_list would reset the
list using free_domain_list
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 03:53:05PM -0500, Ken Cross wrote:
We have a site with SAMBA_3_0 where it takes 12-15 minutes to initialize
winbindd's cache (locks/winbindd_cache.tdb) every time winbindd
restarts. While this is going on, users can't authenticate. (~12,000
users and 9,000 groups
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 12:23:30PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
The bug apparently came in Andrew Bartlett's merge in 1.45; the
provenance of it I don't know. (TNG?) This patch ought to be applied
to 2.2, HEAD, 3.0, and APPL_HEAD.
Tim, how's this patch?
How about this - I've collapsed the
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 12:06:04AM +0100, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
Attached patch can be seen as proposal to discuss behavior of gencache in
case when it is used in applications running under non-priviledged
accounts so that O_RDWR|O_CREAT always fails against system-wide
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 12:12:58AM +0100, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
using google, I found out that some time ago there was some code in
samba-tng for remotely changing the registry via rpc's.
Are there any plans to implement this in Samba (3?)?
Did it work, would it be possible to extract
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 05:06:32PM +, Ronan Waide wrote:
hi folks,
ran this command:
rpcclient -U Administrator%password PDC -c getdriver PRINTER
and got this output:
[Windows 4.0]
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Hi - I've fixed this in the latest CVS. Thanks for reporting it!
Er, should I be worried about this warning?
libsmb/clireadwrite.c: In function `cli_issue_read':
libsmb/clireadwrite.c:54: warning: right shift count = width of type
libsmb/clireadwrite.c: In function `cli_issue_write':
libsmb/clireadwrite.c:301: warning: right shift count = width of type
It's
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 09:02:41AM -0500, Damian, G. C. (Gerald) wrote:
[...]
Is the any way for our pre 3.0 Samba servers to participate
in AD and how do you set it up?
Tridge has written a HOWTO which should be up to date with the
latest Samba code. Look at the file ADS-HOWTO.txt in the
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 02:54:19PM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Is the any way for our pre 3.0 Samba servers to participate
in AD and how do you set it up?
Tridge has written a HOWTO which should be up to date with the
latest Samba code. Look at the file ADS-HOWTO.txt in the Samba
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 10:54:19AM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Can anyone point me at documentation on the limitations of a downlevel
server being a member server in an AD network?
The specific case I am thinking of is a Samba-2.2.x-based server.
I don't have any documentation but I can
I've just upgrade the CVS pserver running on samba.org. If anyone sees
any problems please let me know via email.
Luckily we are running the anonymous CVS pserver in a chroot jail which
is updated via rsync from the actual repository so the effects of anyone
exploiting the bug would be minimal.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 08:40:55AM -0500, Green, Paul wrote:
[2003/01/08 08:26:20, 0] rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c:spoolss_io_devmode(607)
spoolss_io_devmode: Unknown specversion in devicemode [0x0]
[2003/01/08 08:26:20, 0] rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c:spoolss_io_devmode(608)
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 01:11:14AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 05:31:48PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
Here's my idea for fixing this in appliance-head, without reworking
the mutex reference count.
Thanks for that - I've just checked in something close to this.
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 02:42:39PM +0930, Barry Robinson wrote:
Not sure if this is the right mailing list to direct this to, but just
wondering if anyone would know of any functionality in using the KXRPC
service through Samba?
Basically you have to install the KXRPC service on a Windows
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 08:24:18PM -0600, Matt Roberts, GRDA wrote:
First, please accept my thanks for a really great product. I use Samba
extensively and really enjoy it.
I'm glad you enjoy Samba so much. (-:
[...]
In the NMBd debug output (nmbd run with -d 255), I find this excerpt:
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 10:06:19PM +, Ronan Waide wrote:
just spotted this while leafing through the CVS tree (some code elided
for clarity)
Thanks - I've committed a fix for this.
Tim.
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 08:26:40AM +1100, Luke Howard wrote:
[Question 3. What exactly does Kerberos do in the server? If Kerberos is used only
for initial authentication,
then all I need to do is PKINIT in the filesystem on UNIX, right? Or, does
Kerberos actually check a ticket per
each
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 05:29:03PM -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
stored in clear text in secrets.tdb (HEAD) when i join an NT 4.0
domain? It doesn't store the the last change time either.
Unless someone yells, i'm going to fix this.
Er, it's always been in clear text. Or are you
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 11:44:36AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've never done anything in configure.in. What about the following?
I think I fixed this in head already. I'll have to do some janitorial
merging when I get in to work. I'm surprised I haven't been busted
already by Jeremy.
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 05:01:52PM +, John H Terpstra wrote:
Great that you decided, but no one told me about that.
And the Makefile had them going to $(LIBDIR).
Every time any of us make any change to a path for any file - PLEASE BE
AWARE: It may affect our binary packaging, may
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 03:16:09PM -0600, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
Where do I get the samba codesigning key? How do I import it? How
do I know I got the right one?
What do I do if it doesn't verify?
I always wondered if someone uploaded a tarball with a trojan, what's
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 01:21:21PM +0100, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
here's a patch that added the 'modules path' parameter.
lp_modules_path() is prefixed to all lp_modules() witch are not start with
'/' (not absolute pathes)
the default for lp_modules_path() is selectable by
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 11:34:15AM +1100, Luke Howard wrote:
The uuid_to_string() function breaks including the OSF DCE headers
in Samba (which we need for our DCE funnel) as there is a similarly
named function in DCE.
Any chance you could either use the same signature as the OSF DCE
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 08:50:47PM -0500, Yannick Mercier wrote:
I am running 2.2.5 and I would like to know if the
restrict anonymous as been implemented correctly, as it was supposed
to behave from the start, in order to deny
ALL anonymous connections as stated in the man :
When
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 01:40:25PM +0100, Michael Steffens wrote:
recently David Shapiro complained about getent group not working
in large domain groups, in particular Domain Users:
http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/2002-November/040646.html
Resolved the problem in my
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 03:52:03PM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/debug/base/system_erro
r_codes.asp?frame=false
Err. AFAIK, error code 0 means Success, in nearly every errno system
I've seen, btw.
I've seen an error code 0 once in Samba, and I was
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 01:42:22PM -0500, Mike Gerdts wrote:
Now, one problem. nscd (Name Service Caching Daemon) will now run! That
sounds good, right, because normally when winbind is in nsswitch.conf, nscd
bails? Well, when nscd is running, name resolution is done by nscd, NOT the
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 10:31:51PM +0100, Guenther Deschner wrote:
a very small fix for the Makefile...
-x1 LIBS=$(LIBS) \
+ LIBS=$(LIBS) \
Thanks - you can tell I'm an emacs user and that my control key
doesn't work very well. (-:
Tim.
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 10:38:32AM -0600, Steven French wrote:
Scripts run just fine, but binaries give me:
-bash: ./command: cannot
execute binary file along with modprobe: modprobe:
Can't locate module binfmt-464c in syslog
Forgot to copy he list on my earlier response.
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 11:09:11PM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote:
Domain local groups existed under Windows NT 4.0. They were just
available among DC's of the domain. See my other post in response to JF.
To my knowledge (derived from some doc on msdn) they are a different
thing. local groups
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 06:24:22PM -0500, Kelledin wrote:
Minor bugfix in the pidfile creation function. I figured I'd
pass it on to you people as well...I hope this is the correct
list. I've been using it on an NT domain controller since May
with no ill effects.
Well spotted. Applied
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 08:41:15AM +1000, Tim Potter wrote:
The smbcacls program was written before anyone understood access masks
and generic mappings properly. The individual bitmasks are defined in
WINNT.H if you have Visual C++. They are all the constants starting
with FILE_.
Now
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 07:36:25AM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
It is the wrong place to do it. If some data should only be accessible
by root then it should live in secrets.tdb otherwise it should go
somewhere else.
I know. This is just experimental code playing with the thought how
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 08:58:18AM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
17) Merge winbindd with current (more advanced) state of play in
APPLIANCE_HEAD
Can anyone enlighten to me as to what exactly that means? What
functionality was added, what fixes were applied, etc.?
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 09:00:17PM -0400, Green, Paul wrote:
HEAD has cli_dfs.c in the directory source/rpc_client.
2_2 and 3_0 have cli_dfs.c in the directory source/libsmb.
These file locations match source/Makefile.in *except* in 3_0, where it
claims that cli_dfs.c is in
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 01:47:38PM +0200, Martin Wilck wrote:
To initiate this process we'd only need a standardized protocol for
the socket communication. Andrew said that doesn't exist and won't with
regard to winbind. I'd like to focus the discussion in this direction.
- is the winbind
I'm just wondering whether it is strictly necessary to uppercase the
username and domain name when performing a session setup. Applying the
following patch should not break anything and would make smbclient be
able to test for case sensitivity bugs in the remote server.
The behaviour of
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 02:25:53AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
While Volker has written the command net {get,set}localsid, it would be
nice if it could do the following:
net getlocalsid name
and
net setlocalsid name=SID
Sounds good - can you make the name part optional and
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 12:15:36PM +0200, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
This is first implementation of caching mechanism. It includes
both lib/gencache.c code and utils/net_cache.c as command-line
control/testing tool.
comments are welcome
Rafal, that looks pretty good. Since you ask, I do
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 02:10:23AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You assume that any cached data will be in null terminated string format
which is not always the case.
I understand this is a design property - it's up to the caller to mess with
structs etc. This keeps the cache
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 06:42:16PM -0500, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
Earlier today, Microsoft's knowledge base appeared to be down. All the
decorations would appear, but the content was missing. It now seems that
ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/developr/drg/CIFS/ is also unavailable. I'm curious
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 10:05:57PM -0500, Gerald Carter wrote:
This looks ok, but you did test the server code after you made
the changes right? Sorry, but I'm a little paranoid about this
code since it took me longer than it should have to work correctly
I did - we don't
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 11:24:43PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
This patch removes WINBINDD_DOMAIN, and some of the misguided (and
fruitless) attempts to prevent winbind from calling smbd recursivly. (I
fixed that the 'proper' way, and the worst case is a pipe timeout of 30
sec, not a
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 01:06:40PM +0200, Thomas Reifferscheid wrote:
If I have more then 21 printers in smb.conf I get
[2002/08/15 12:30:50, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_werror(618)
000c status: WERR_INSUFFICIENT_BUFFER
with the rpc enumprinters.
What the heck is this ?
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 07:26:09PM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
This is a long standing bug in our client code that can't handle
fragmented PDUs. It's been on my list to fix for a while and maybe
I'll get around to it next week :-)
Oh wow - I didn't know that. Thanks for the info.
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 12:29:32AM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
We run SAMBA on a Unix box with case sensitive file naming (i.e. standard
Unix usage).
Relevant entries in smb.conf
case sensitive = yes
This is really bad. Do no do this unless you are willing to suffer the
On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 11:05:05AM -0400, David Collier-Brown wrote:
Please if even we pass functionality to net make it so it does not need
a running samba to work for local management as current utilities do.
Might I restate that as
1) there should be one way to do the
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 11:17:34AM -0700, Ben Johnson wrote:
This is part of a packet dump that ends with the STATUS_PIPE_BUSY. If I
remove the user from just a few groups then I never get the
STATUS_PIPE_BUSY message and the second request goes through. But
nothing else (that I see so
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 06:59:31PM -0700, Ben Johnson wrote:
The problem comes when, after I succeed in getting a very large list of
group names, I ask for another. The second request fails and I get an
NT error code of STATUS_PIPE_BUSY. Does anyone know what that means?
The latest school
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 04:30:06AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Joerg Schilling wrote:
[Added Samba-technical so that this discussion can be recorded]
Please speak slowly and clearly into the microphone.
The SEC_DESC contains the Owner SID and the Primary Group SID
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 06:01:41PM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote:
any objection into adding a function to talloc to import a previously
allocated memory?
something like that:
bool talloc_memorize(TALLOC_CTX *t, void *src, size_t src_size)
Hi Simo.
Isn't this going to cause horrible problems
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 04:47:17AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
The whole thing is based on the authentication used by any SMB client that
connects to a SMB server:
- The client connects to the server
- The server generates and sends some random bytes (challenge)
- The client sends a
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 06:23:38AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Nope. There's a challenge sent by either the server and then the client
produces a LM and NT response which is a hash of the challenge and the
user's password. This is sent to the server (in this case winbindd) for
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 03:57:11PM -0400, Leducq Dominique wrote:
Le Mercredi 20 F?vrier 2002 12:51, Tim Potter a ?crit :
Nmbd needs to be running on the local system as there are some lookup
requests send by winbindd that are sent by Windows NT domain controllers
to the incorrect port
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 11:05:39AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Just for the record, no one was placing the burden on you andrew
(or even suggesting that it rested upon you). If you don't want to
do it or would rather work on something else, then that's fine.
I think you read too much
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 10:43:13AM -0500, Gerald Carter wrote:
We should probably apply the daemon tools patch if it is ok.
This has been brought several times in the past. Do you have a
link?
Hmm - can't find the link in the mail archives. I do have:
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 04:30:27PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
I've been messing about with some of the SAMSYNC stuff, in particular
hoping that a domain member might be able to request a list of users.
Unfortunetly not, it looks like this is restricted to BDCs.
Yes. You have to be a
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 04:09:17PM -0500, Gerald Carter wrote:
congrats, that's a very good idea.
but what is the aim ? you got some drivers requiring server registry
access ?
Debugging more than anything else. Comparing PrinterData keys
between local and remote printers. Will
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 10:08:29AM +0300, Nieminen, Jooel wrote:
I'm using 2.2.4 and have same problem.
I don't see printers in explorer when browse the samba-server but in
add printer list of printer sharing machines I see it.
This is fixed in HEAD - I thought I also merged it in to 2.2.5
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 03:27:02PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
Please examine this security problem and take measures to be necessary.
Ok - in conversation with tridge we don't think this is an exploitable
hole. If you believe otherwise can you please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with full
OK I've been working at this a bit more and have come up with some
performance modifications:
- Only cache the #1b and #1c names for a very short period of time
(say 10 seconds) as these names can change quickly especially if
they are stored on a WINS server.
- If a cli_connect()
I've put together some patches to solve some issues related to DNS and
name resolution issues within Samba. They will probably go in to the
appliance branch, but I am keen for them to also be applied to HEAD.
The problem is that Samba is reliant on a working DNS server and
misconfigurations of
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 05:55:30PM +0200, Alain Defrance wrote:
i wonder why i 've some process run by root and some by my users ?
like this :
0001177 12078 218 2 17:46:33 ?0:11 -d2 smbd
root 1373 218 0 13:53:20 ?0:49 -d2 smbd
root 6301 218 0 15:41:37 ?
On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 09:00:56AM +0200, Alain Defrance wrote:
hello,
i'm using Samba Version 2.2.4 on Solaris 5.8
in my smb.conf i have max smbd processes = 200
when i use tesparm for checking i've the following answer :
ERROR: the 'max smbd processes' parameter is set and the
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 01:55:44PM +0300, Osman Tufanogullari (Garanti Teknoloji)
wrote:
But after starting winbindd deamon,
wbinfo -m ( trusted domain names ) -- OK
wbinfo -t ( check secret ) -- OK
wbinfo -n username ( sid from username ) -- OK
wbinfo -s sid ( username from sid) --
On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 12:02:00AM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote:
Yes, I think internal format (and format for tdbs) of utf8 seems
like the best idea (IMHO).
There is a problem with utf8 for many fixed-size records in various tdbs.
Also, most of data is in UCS-2 already.
I don't think
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 06:12:10PM -0400, Ingmar Koecher wrote:
First I apologize if I am not posting this to the correct list, but it seems
rather specific and I haven't had any success posting it to the regular samba
list (but then I might just be impatient).
I am running Samba as of
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 11:12:08AM +0200, Tom Vandepoel wrote:
Since we've switched to spoolss printing (samba 2.2.4) it seems that the
server is always trying to connect to the client.
[2002/06/11 10:52:41, 3] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_out(843)
Connecting to 10.0.40.80 at port 445
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 11:34:43PM -0500, Gerald Carter wrote:
I'm writing some test routines for the print notification stuff and it's
rather a lot of mucking around. Can I do this after 2.2.5 ships and
before HEAD printing gets blown away?
Please don't mess with 2.2 printing before
On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 12:17:19AM +0200, Kai Krueger wrote:
currently, as far as I can see, the access control to the SAM database is
only based upon file access to the db-files. On normal installations
therefore only the root user can change, delete or add things instead of the
entire
I'm thinking about taking back the restrict anonymous parameter and
using it to do Good Things. Previously in HEAD and currently in 2.2 it
stops people connecting to shares anonymously but I think Mr Bartlett
removed it because it was either buggy or didn't do anything useful.
I propose that
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 04:37:59PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
I propose that this parameter act like the RestrictAnonymous registry
setting, i.e it prevents anonymous access to the SAMR pipe and anonymous
access to the NetShareEnum RPC when set to 1. When set to 2, it
disallows
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 08:45:26PM +0200, Juergen Hasch wrote:
dos charset - dos codepage used by clients
unix charset - character set used in your unix system
display charset - character set used in programs which display information to
the user (e.g. smbclient)
This is what my smb.conf
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 01:01:05AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
This allowed me to remove cli_pipe_util.c, which was calling
cli_establish_connection.
tpot: I'm not sure what direction you were going with the client stuff,
and
you may well have been wanting the init functions. If
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 11:17:59AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Anyway - that looks like a good patch. I've been dying to get rid of all
those silly make_nmb_name() calls everywhere but was not brave enough.
I'll proabably add a cli_pipe_connection() function (feel free to suggest
a
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
