Please resend with a mailer that doesn't wrap at 80 columns :-).
Jeremy.
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 09:30:07AM -0500, Irving Carrion wrote:
Currently the snap has a hard time reading Samba's domain users / groups
correctly. The patch (I did not write the code) simply fixes this
problem. It works fine on W2k servers, but I think it runs on a windows
appliance
On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 08:10:03PM -0600, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If two SessionSetups are sent, each resulting in a separate [V]UID,
then does Windows apply correct restrictions to each or does it allow
the greater set of permissions? That is:
The
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 02:19:48PM +0100, Edgar, Bob wrote:
Hi all,
I've been having a problem with nmbd crashing multiple times per day.
I suspect that the problem is caused by a shell script that tries to
lookup the name for ws to ws4000 to build a DNS reverse table.
It look
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 03:01:55PM -0500, Pierre Belanger wrote:
Hi,
I turned on use sendfile, not too long after (on the next
logon) someone called me. His Windows 95 was having trouble
opening files on the server. He can explore the shared volume
but when trying to open a file, his
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 07:26:58PM +, Waider wrote:
It appears that store_queue_struct is expecting a different version of
tdb_pack, since it's feeding an extra NULL to tdb_pack in place of the
format argument. This causes smbd to explode. (Samba HEAD, as ever)
Fixed, thanks.
Jeremy.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 10:33:13PM +0100, Stéphane Purnelle wrote:
Why I have no answer for my questions ?
I repeat the situation :
RedHat 8.0 with samba 2.2.8 compiled wiwth ldapsam and acl-support
I need the print$ share and this system dont't work.
I explain :
when I add a driver, the
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 10:02:13PM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Would this be a better fix for the devicetype problem?
It looks like we are putting the strings into the buffer twice, and we
are not returning the 'fixed' devicetype for both protocol levels ( NT1
and NT1).
What happened
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 02:30:32PM -0800, Eric Horst wrote:
Hello! With great enthusiasm I upgraded from 2.2.7a to 2.2.8 last week
to get the critical security fix. However, it appears that msdfs is
broken in 2.2.8. Several on the 'samba' list have reported this as
well. Some say it
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 01:58:49AM +, Ronan Waide wrote:
Ok, I think I've figured this out, but since I'm relatively new to
Samba internals I'm not entirely clear on how to fix it, or what I
might break with my fix.
In a large RPC call, such as an EnumPrinters 2 call with a big buffer,
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 08:39:22PM +0100, Jan Houstek wrote:
Hi all!
I posted this in [EMAIL PROTECTED] but there were no reactions.
Particulary I'm interested if anyone observe the same behavior.
I'll take a look at this.
Jeremy.
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 02:30:32PM -0800, Eric Horst wrote:
Hello! With great enthusiasm I upgraded from 2.2.7a to 2.2.8 last week
to get the critical security fix. However, it appears that msdfs is
broken in 2.2.8. Several on the 'samba' list have reported this as
well. Some say it
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 02:30:32PM -0800, Eric Horst wrote:
Hello! With great enthusiasm I upgraded from 2.2.7a to 2.2.8 last week
to get the critical security fix. However, it appears that msdfs is
broken in 2.2.8. Several on the 'samba' list have reported this as
well. Some say it
On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 12:36:27AM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
We should create the right magic in IDMAP to make sure that we always
keep this stuff in one record. (ie, the record with the user/group).
If not, then create the right ldap magic to cope with our own structural
objectClass.
On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 09:51:51PM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
Hmm. Just checked. This is definitely a change in behaviour. If you
do not want the full winbind functionality, a simple 'add user script'
is quite handy. Is there a reason why this does not work anymore as in
2.2? 2.2 added a
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 09:44:26AM +0100, Olaf Fr±czyk wrote:
Hi,
I remember some time ago several people were discussing about putting
the Hidden, System, Archive, Read-Only bits in EAs.
Has it been done in 3.0?
Will it be in 2.2.x serie?
Not done for 2.2., I'm thinking about it for
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 03:01:51PM -0500, Ken Cross wrote:
Samba-folk:
Samba apparently does not support Alternate Data Streams/Multiple Data
Streams. ADS/MDS are the hidden files associated with the Summary tab
on a 2K/XP/.Net version of Windows. A file on a SAMBA_3_0 server does
not
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 10:12:47AM +1100, Tim Potter wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 03:46:59PM -0500, Ken Cross wrote:
Yes, to support it properly, the underlying filesystem should include
all streams when you cp/mv/rm/... And a portable backup/restore could
be interesting!
However,
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 10:28:59AM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote:
Okay. I was being stupid. Very very stupid, and I apologize. Turns out mangled
filenames was disabled. But is this the expected error when manged filenames are
disabled?
Obviously :-). I'll take a look at what the semantics should
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 08:36:10AM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 01:38, Jianliang Lu wrote:
Hi,
I've patched the samba3.0 alpha22 for logon_time, now the user's logon time
is updated when he logs on successfully.
In attachment is the patch.
Does NT do this only
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 03:27:49PM -0800, Abrahim Kalehzan wrote:
Hi there,
I'm running Samba 2.2.3 on Apple OS X 10.2.4.
Is there any patches or upgrade to go to Samba 2.2.8 for Apple OS X 10.2.4?
Apple will be releasing one shortly (not to pre-announce for them).
I sent them a custom
On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 06:47:44PM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote:
Following up to myself, reproducing this is apparently even simpler than I thought -
simply do a:
touch nir test test
and try to delete it from a DOS command line. It will fail.
nirtest123456 fails as well, but nirtest12345
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 08:13:15PM +0100, Willi Mann wrote:
Is 3.0 also vulnerable?
3.0 is not released yet. 3.0 alphas are vulnerable, the
SAMBA_3_0 code in CVS is not.
Jeremy.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 11:22:57PM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Yep - I'm about 2 weeks behind on janitorial duties :-(
That's very dangerous. What happens then is someone fixes
it differently in 3.0, and then we have a problem.
Remember, if a fix is obviously applicable to 3.0 it should
On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 05:54:17PM +0200, Nir Livni wrote:
Any list of affected source files would be appreciated.
I have replied to Nir privately off-list.
Jeremy.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 12:22:55AM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
Hi tridge,
here's the patch that adds client site quota support to samba,
with a util smbcquotas just like smbcalcs...
this is able get and set user quotas
and get and set the filesystem quota settings.
This
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 12:48:55AM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
At 23:32 12.03.2003 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 12:22:55AM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
Hi tridge,
here's the patch that adds client site quota support to samba,
with a
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 07:10:10PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
I've been testing injection of many jobs (thousands) into a print
queue, and am noticing that appliance_head samba seems to spend heaps
of time in print_queue_update, trying to reconcile the output of lpq
with samba's database.
Yep.
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 12:18:55PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
I observed that it spends a large fraction of its time in
print_parse_jobid, called from traverse_fn_delete, called from
print_queue_update. This function is I think called O(n**2) times,
because smbd compares every job in the tdb
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 04:49:56PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
Some files have a little valgrind_strlen function in there, I suppose
to work around a Valgrind bug. Does anyone know what the bug was?
There might be a cleaner solution.
Yep, it's a glibc inlining strlen() calls problem, causes a
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 10:38:12PM -0500, Ken Cross wrote:
The behavior you're seeing is because LDAP is being used to get the
group membership rather that RPC.
Last month I posted a patch to fix this, but to my knowledge it hasn't
been incorporated. (I'm not bitching, just explaining...)
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 10:13:03PM +0100, Juergen Hasch wrote:
Hi,
I installed heimdal-0.5.1 on my Linux box. When compiling Samba HEAD with gcc
3.2 I get lots of warning messages like these :
In file included from include/includes.h:421,
from smbd/notify.c:22:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 10:21:06PM +0100, Love wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anybody else seen this ?
This is brokenness in the Heimdal header files, not in Samba.
The Heimdal developers need to compile with more warnings set
in gcc.
What more then
-Wall
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 12:46:28PM +1100, Tim Potter wrote:
There's an interesting story about that. (-: At the time I fixed this
problem we were in don't touch the 2.2 branch unless it is a critical
bug fix, and also in this will be the last version of 2.2 for sure
mode.
I guess we are
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 03:55:49PM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
I have a little fix for the id_sid cache, to correct return the sidtype.
Hi Stefan,
Actually there isn't any point in returning the sidtype
here that I can see. We're only after the uid_t or gid_t
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 10:25:27PM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Tim Potter wrote:
It's fixed in HEAD.
Yeah, well someone forgot their janitorial duties :-)
I take it that means 3.0 and HEAD will be seeing your
cli_XXX 64 bit fixes shortly. :-) :-) :-).
Jeremy.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 12:24:09AM -0600, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
I'm going to do a very brief writeup of NT_CREATE_ANDX, but I remember
hearing rumors dark lurking daemons. What do I need to know? What is there
about this command that should be documented?
It's *monstrous*. There
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 10:51:10AM -0800, Srikanta Shivanna wrote:
I observed it while running the following modified torture test:
Thanks ! That saves me from writing one :-) :-). I'll look into it
asap !
Jeremy.
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 10:51:10AM -0800, Srikanta Shivanna wrote:
I observed it while running the following modified torture test:
Great test. I've applied a modified version of it to smbtorture in HEAD
and fixed the bug in Samba's locking implementation. Thanks !
Jeremy.
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 01:20:14PM +0100, Michael Steffens wrote:
Noticed why :)
The current caching code does also cache local lookups, meaning that
local groups (and machine SIDs when Samba is running as DC) can also
occur?
Hmm, I'm not sure whether the speed gain for local lookups
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 07:50:22PM -0800, Srikanta Shivanna wrote:
I noticed a difference in byte range locking behavior between Samba (2.2.x) and
Windows 2000 server, basically on Samba 2.2.x
with strict locking enabled, a client process which owns a shared byte range lock
can write to the
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 11:07:49AM -0800, Leo Qiu wrote:
Hi,
I seem to find some possible memory leaks in Samba
code. The patch is attached, Could you guys have a
look to check whether it is correct?
One of them was, one wasn't. I've added comments to the POSIX_ACL
code to make it clearer -
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 10:03:57PM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
HI all,
here's a small fix for returning the correct sidtype in sid_to_uid() and
sid_to_gid()
this should be applied to all branches with the new uid - sid caching code
No attachment - please try again.
Jeremy.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 10:20:35PM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
At 21:07 19.02.2003 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 10:03:57PM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
HI all,
here's a small fix for returning the correct sidtype in sid_to_uid() and
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 11:46:35AM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
What is the commit policy for 3.0? Should all changes be moved from
HEAD except ones that are explicitly too risky? Or only bug fixes?
What about documentation?
Use common sense :-). If it's a new/risky feature - add to HEAD only
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 06:23:41PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
One little malloc() could hardly make it any worse, although I will do
a test tomorrow to check.
One little malloc() - I'll remind you of that quote later :-).
But please do the test, that's the only way we can really
be sure if
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 10:49:28PM +0100, Ludolf Holzheid wrote:
In the embedded/real time world, malloc() and friends are strongly
deprecated as you can't predict how long they will take. They have to
go through a linked list of unknown length and may even start a
garbage collection.
Does anyone know how to detect a truu64 system in configure.in ?
I'm going through my patchlist and there is a big optimisation that
can be done on systems where the getgrnam() call works (True64 is
listed as the only broken system) and I'd like to add this to
all branches by adding a
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 11:01:53AM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
StrCaseCmp (and strequal) in HEAD has the interesting side-effect that it only
compares the first PSTRING_LEN (1024) bytes of the strings.
I suppose comparing strings longer than that is probably a bit
unlikely, but it still seems
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 03:23:40PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
On 18 Feb 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What exactly do you want to do here ? I'm not clear what
you mean?
The thing I noticed is that StrCaseCmp (and indeed many charcnv
function) truncate strings to 1024 characters.
I
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 11:24:23AM +, Chris Wakelin wrote:
We had big problems with an upgrade to Samba 2.2.3a on Solaris 8 due
to this groups change. Samba 2.2.2 was fine, but had occassional
oplock problems (hence the desire to upgrade). We have a large number
(~1000) of (sometimes
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 11:41:35AM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to start a discussion on the following:
Implementing some SMB functions in the Kernel, within a Samba base,
or,
Bending and twisting Samba out of shape.
There are a number of reasons for wanting to
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 07:36:19AM -0500, Ken Cross wrote:
Samba-folk:
I've run into a problem with winbindd in both 2.2.x and 3.0 where it
just locks up after a while on large, busy networks.
We finally tracked down the problem to the fact that the C library
select function is limited by
; author: jra; state: Exp; lines: +21 -25
SMBencrypt needs dos codepage also. Change tdb_pack/unpack to take a
function pointer applied to all strings if it exists. Jeremy.
Sorry about that. I'll watch for these nasty differences more closely
in future.
Jeremy.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 09:46:44PM -0500, Ken Cross wrote:
Samba-folk:
The dual winbindd daemon hasn't been working (at least not on NetBSD).
It always bombs out with
[2003/02/11 10:03:23, 2] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(582)
tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: /var/samba/locks/winbindd_idmap.tdb
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 03:23:37PM -0500, Green, Paul wrote:
Anthony Liguori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
scandir() (and it's [alpha|version]sort() brethren) is a BSD/Linux-ism and
therefore isn't very portable. Since this is in a VFS module (and
therefore only optional) I guess
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 11:35:01PM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
I'm wondering, why (in HEAD and 3.0)
rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c:_spoolss_enddocprinter_internal() doesn't
handle any errors?
It sort of makes sense if we don't check the output of running the unix
'lpr' command (due to the
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 09:10:41AM -0500, Ken Cross wrote:
Samba-folk:
A couple of weeks ago I posted a patch to winbindd_ads.c to change the
behavior of WINBINDD_GETGRNAM and WINBINDD_GETGRGID using LDAP.
Currently, if you do WINBINDD_GETGRNAM to an NT domain using RPC, you
get *all* the
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 02:26:25PM +, Neil Hoggarth wrote:
Consider a file with ownership and mode such that a client has
read-only permission on that file.
Suppose that this file is open read-only by second client, with a
share mode of DENY_WRITE.
If the first client attempts to open
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 07:27:24PM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
I just see that newer version's of heimdal and mit have krb5-config.
it would be cool to use it by default if it's available and if not fallback
to the current tests
Didn't know about it :-). I'll take
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 07:38:31AM -0800, Jeff Mandel wrote:
Here's gdb with bt from two processes 12279 and 12327
root@reiger# gdb /usr/local/samba/bin/smbd 12279
GNU gdb 5.0
Copyright 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 02:12:29PM +0100, Michael Steffens wrote:
Hi,
we are running a big Samba 2.2.7a server with Winbind (100 concurrent
users, 600 id mappings created since then) since last weekend.
It's running quite well! :)
However, users are complaining about Samba being very
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 01:01:07PM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
the latest HEAD didn't not compile with heimdal on SuSE8.1
because AP_OPTS_USE_SUBKEY is not defined in the heimdal/krb5.h
only in the MIT krb5.h :-(
is it possible to fix samba that it finally
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 11:01:13AM +0100, Steve Hardy wrote:
not entirely true again
the error in the current code is
S - SR = SR
H - HR = HR
which should be
S - SR = S
H - HR = H
that's all. Still simplifies the code.
Ok, I finally got to test this and built a torture tester
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 12:58:45PM +0100, Michael Steffens wrote:
Hi Samba team,
as 2.2.8 seems to approach now, have the following patches been
considered for it? They both don't add functionality, but rather
improve robustness, and are platform independent:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 09:07:23AM -0800, Jeff Mandel wrote:
I have followed this fcntl bug closely, and I just applied a T-patch for
solaris 8 which brought the kernel 108528-19. This includes the fix for
4735093. This has not fixed the problem of smbd growing to consume all
available CPU.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 10:55:12AM -0500, Hal Roberts wrote:
The purpose of this mail is to make sure no one else is
working on / has already finished hacking samba's file
change notification support to support notification of
individual file changes. If not, I plan on doing so forthwith.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:44:06PM +1100, Tim Potter wrote:
Er, should I be worried about this warning?
libsmb/clireadwrite.c: In function `cli_issue_read':
libsmb/clireadwrite.c:54: warning: right shift count = width of type
libsmb/clireadwrite.c: In function `cli_issue_write':
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 11:28:02PM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Is there a portable way to isolate the upper 32 bits?
Check out the #ifdef code in smbd/reply.c
Jeremy.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 10:53:17PM +0100, Jean Francois Micouleau wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Pagani Jr, Ronald wrote:
Why not store DOS bit modes in an accompanying dot file? (The DOS
modes then read by smbd if it (the dot file) exists)
this idea has already been bitten to death.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 12:50:57PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
On 16 Jan 2003, Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Win2k has a bug (feature?) where there is a connection reset if there is
a second connection from the SAME IP, before the first
session-setup.
So an unprivileged
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 01:07:34AM -0500, Michael Bennett wrote:
So... comments? Does the patch Do The Right Thing? Think this patch or
something similar could get merged sometime? :)
I remember looking at this patch. The problem is it does something
like :
#ifdef *BSD..
new
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 07:49:48AM +0100, Juergen Hasch wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So if I'm understanding you correctly this is actually a kernel
bug - correct ?
Can you point me at the areas in the kernel source where the problem
occurs so I can see how to make smbd work around it
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 11:06:46PM +0100, Juergen Hasch wrote:
Jeremy,
I'm having problems with change notification in Samba 2.2.x under Linux
since you changed the signal
handling stuff some time ago.
An application I'm using always complains about missing change
notification, although
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 11:39:27PM +0100, Juergen Hasch wrote:
Can you give me more details please about where smbd is missing
the signal ? smbd should not be able to miss these signals, as
all they do is set a flag that is then processed inline in the
main loop.
Please give me more
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 05:07:50PM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
Hi Jerry,
I noticed that if I'm using MS Access 97 on a NT4 machine I can't access to
database files witch are in directories 12 chars, but if I do the same
thing on an w2k or NT4 server is works.
I see that the
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 05:25:20PM +1100, Tim Potter wrote:
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 01:11:14AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 05:31:48PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
Here's my idea for fixing this in appliance-head, without reworking
the mutex reference count.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 02:04:12PM -0800, P Ranjit Kumar wrote:
Hi
Samba 3.0 Alpha21 tries to emulate the timegm() call. When it does that, it
sets the TZ= before it invokes the mktime() call. However, on HP-UX,
setting TZ= makes the timezone to be EST but what we want is GMT for
time_t
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 05:31:48PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
Here's my idea for fixing this in appliance-head, without reworking
the mutex reference count.
Thanks for that - I've just checked in something close to this. Take
a look and let me know...
Thanks,
Jeremy.
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 05:12:15PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
I found a data-corruption bug in ccache a few weeks ago relating to
incorrect handling of wait() status codes, so I thought I would do a
quick check for similar things in Samba.
Part of this (the smbd/chgpasswd.c patch) is incorrect
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 06:08:01PM -0600, Steven French wrote:
In implementing oplock code in the Linux cifs vfs I noticed that Win2K
sends a UID of zero (but non-zero FID and TID) on the oplock break from the
server ... this implies that the space of valid fids is not related to the
UID.
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 12:00:15PM -0500, Haley, Kevin (K.A.) wrote:
Hello,
I've read the discussion in the list archives regarding the
Solaris fnctl problem which appears to be related to the
lingering problem our site is having since recent migration to
2.2.6 for our print server
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 10:53:41AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey there, I posted a quick fix for a problem I found with all samba's up
to 2.2.7a on the general samba list, which describes the following
problem:
In Windows, if you create a file with NORMAL attributes and ALWAYS_CREATE,
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 03:14:51PM +0200, Nir Livni wrote:
Samba does not allow user B to open the file for read after user A has
opened it for delete_on_close.
NT/2K server allows it.
My question is why samba allows user A to open delete_on_close after user B
opens for read,
And does not
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 07:22:33PM -0500, Ken Cross wrote:
I found and fixed a problem where winbindd had trouble enumerating
*lots* of groups (~2000 in my case). This is in SAMBA_3_0, but it's in
other versions, too.
The problem was in the enum_dom_groups routine in winbindd_rcp.c, line
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 11:21:02PM -0500, Ken Cross wrote:
Sure, it isn't obvious.
start isn't where the list is in number of entries, it's an index into
some data structure (coming from the DC, I think). The num_entries
would increment by 513 (in my tests), but cli_samr_enum_dom_groups
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 01:01:19PM +0100, Simo Sorce wrote:
My idea was this:
let make it so taht if unix extensions are enabled, then we NEVER
resolve the links if we permit link creation.
So if unix extensions are true, then all opens set O_NOFOLLOW.
Ok if O_NOFOLLOW is defined and exists in
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 11:45:56AM -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Richard Sharpe wrote:
So, while it is clear that there are assholes in the world,
there are also those who make it all worth while.
Richard,
On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 07:09:43PM +1100, John Newbigin wrote:
If no one has any problems with this patch, can it be applied?
John.
Original Message
Subject: Patch for unix extensions
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 09:51:39 +1100
From: John Newbigin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 09:04:33PM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Hi,
As a result of a complaint about the above topic I found a bug in
libsmb/clireadwrite.c that caused writes to an SMB server to corrupt files
larger than 4GB and ignore everthing above 4GB+a bit.
I have applied a patch
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 10:43:27PM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Well, Herb fixed some other problems but not that one.
BTW, how do I add stuff to 3.0? Which tag should I use?
SAMBA_3_0
I've already merged it - thanks !
Jeremy.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 09:01:16PM -0600, Matt Roberts, GRDA wrote:
In my search for the cause of the behavior seen in my earlier post,
I traced the function call path to these two interesting functions,
int source/lib/util.c at about line 133:
BOOL set_global_scope(const char *scope)
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 04:47:59PM -0800, Conrad Minshall wrote:
I must go work other issues... and hope someone else follows up so EFBIG is
dealt with sensibly.
I checked in the simple fix (map EFBIG to NT_STATUS_DISK_FULL) so it's not
an immediate problem.
Jeremy.
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:05:43PM -0800, Scott Hammond wrote:
Hello,
Im a newbie developer and Ive submitted a patch to
this list a few days ago. Is this the best method to
submit fixes, or what procedure should I follow? Will
someone review my fix and add it to the code?
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 03:35:11PM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
At 22:46 11.12.2002 +1100, Luke Howard wrote:
There was a small nit in the authentication subsystem that
prevented dynamic loading of authentication providers. The
attached patch fixes this.
Hi Luke,
I think your
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:27:07PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have smbwrapper and smbsh working on Debian/woody with the Linux 2.4 kernel
and the default C library: libc-2.2.5.so. There is a problem that rears its
ugly head with a few programs (segmentation violation, presumably due
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 08:10:00PM -0800, Conrad Minshall wrote:
A local filesystem has to return EFBIG to Samba (per POSIX write system
call def'n) and in the Samba source I'm looking at EFBIG isn't used
anywhere relevant to a WRITE_ANDX, in particular it isn't in the
unix_dos_nt_errmap
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 01:42:18AM -0800, Conrad Minshall wrote:
I'm testing my smb client against Samba on FreeBSD. The server's
local filesystem has a maximum filesize of 16 Terabytes. If my
client attempts a writex with an offset of exactly 16TB then I see
ERRnoaccess rather than
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 02:00:44PM -0800, Arcady Chernyak wrote:
Hi.
I suggest the following small SAMBA code improvement in printing area.
All known SAMBA versions can't return to Windows client any return code
after calling print command.
I need it therefore I made the following SAMBA
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 04:48:32PM +0100, Michael Steffens wrote:
Hi,
noticed that very recently a bunch of patches was checked
in the SAMBA_2_2 CVS tree, correcting STAT_ST_BLOCKSIZE
to be 512 for a number of platforms. (see configure and
configure.in)
It remained on 8192 for HP-UX
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
