Re: trust relationship listing (patch)

sion of rpc_trustdom_list() function. > > > > I'm waiting for _any_ feedback. > > Applied, see commit message. Thank you, I've just seen it. -- cheers, ++ |Rafal 'Mimir' Szczesniak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | |*BSD, GNU/Linux and Samba / |__/

Re: net local functionality

ld be born, then. Jean Francois suggested we could use tool like smbcontrol to take over entire "local" features. And to leave 'net' close enough to MS equivalent. -- cheers, +----+ |Rafal 'Mimir' Szczesniak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | |*BSD, GNU/Linux and Samba / |__/

trust relationship listing (patch)

7;m sure Andrew will argue ;-) More neat version of rpc_trustdom_list() function. I'm waiting for _any_ feedback. -- cheers, +----+ |Rafal 'Mimir' Szczesniak <[EMAIL PROT

a few quite serious fixes

x27; result. -- cheers, +----+ |Rafal 'Mimir' Szczesniak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | |*BSD, GNU/Linux and Samba / |__/ Index: rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c ===

running rpc calls in 'net'

t patch should not be modified too much. -- cheers, +----+ |Rafal 'Mimir' Szczesniak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | |*BSD, GNU/Linux and Samba / |__/

trusted domains patch number n+1

r the main ways and ideas are visible ;) any comments are appreciated -- cheers, ++ |Rafal 'Mimir' Szczesniak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | |*BSD

trusted domains patch

, ++ |Rafal 'Mimir' Szczesniak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | |*BSD, GNU/Linux and Samba / |__/ Index: lib/util_unistr.c