On 9 Jan 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for checking it.
> Part of this (the smbd/chgpasswd.c patch) is incorrect I think.
>
> You have changed the line :
>
> if (WIFEXITED(wstat) == 0) {
> ...
> return False;
> }
>
> to
>
> if (WIFEXITED(wstat)) {
> ...
> retu
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 05:12:15PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> I found a data-corruption bug in ccache a few weeks ago relating to
> incorrect handling of wait() status codes, so I thought I would do a
> quick check for similar things in Samba.
Part of this (the smbd/chgpasswd.c patch) is incorrec
I found a data-corruption bug in ccache a few weeks ago relating to
incorrect handling of wait() status codes, so I thought I would do a
quick check for similar things in Samba.
A patch is included:
- several cases where child process failure is not detected
- one inverted boolean
- better m
