Re: Bug in HEAD: srv_samr_nt.c and smbgroupedit assume algorithmic RIDs.

2002-09-25 Thread Andrew Bartlett
Volker Lendecke wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 10:54:40PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > Despite all the fuss, the changes there really are not that > > big, just fundamental ;-) > > vlendec@delphin:~/head/source> find -name \*.c | xargs grep pdb\_ | wc -l >1596 As I said, not that b

Re: Bug in HEAD: srv_samr_nt.c and smbgroupedit assume algorithmic RIDs.

2002-09-25 Thread Volker Lendecke
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 10:54:40PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > Despite all the fuss, the changes there really are not that > big, just fundamental ;-) vlendec@delphin:~/head/source> find -name \*.c | xargs grep pdb\_ | wc -l 1596 Questions? Volker msg03194/pgp0.pgp Description: P

Re: Bug in HEAD: srv_samr_nt.c and smbgroupedit assume algorithmic RIDs.

2002-09-25 Thread Andrew Bartlett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > As you work into this area, you will see why we decided on the 'start > > over'... > > My concern is that we will not be able to finish that work in any > reasonable time frame. I would like to see 3.0 released.

Re: Bug in HEAD: srv_samr_nt.c and smbgroupedit assume algorithmic RIDs.

2002-09-25 Thread Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
At 14:40 25.09.2002 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > > > As you work into this area, you will see why we decided on the 'start > > over'... > >My concern is that we will not be able to finish that work in any >reasonable time frame. I would like to

Re: Bug in HEAD: srv_samr_nt.c and smbgroupedit assume algorithmic RIDs.

2002-09-25 Thread Volker.Lendecke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > As you work into this area, you will see why we decided on the 'start > over'... My concern is that we will not be able to finish that work in any reasonable time frame. I would like to see 3.0 released. I completely agree that a redesign is desira

Re: Bug in HEAD: srv_samr_nt.c and smbgroupedit assume algorithmic RIDs.

2002-09-25 Thread Andrew Bartlett
Volker Lendecke wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 02:21:07PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > srv_samr_nt.c assumes algorithmic mapping for creation of new > > users. In lines 3891 and 3956 it calls pdb_gid_to_group_rid to create > ^ > Oops, sorry, this should read 'groups' obviously.

Re: Bug in HEAD: srv_samr_nt.c and smbgroupedit assume algorithmic RIDs.

2002-09-25 Thread Volker Lendecke
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 02:21:07PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > srv_samr_nt.c assumes algorithmic mapping for creation of new > users. In lines 3891 and 3956 it calls pdb_gid_to_group_rid to create ^ Oops, sorry, this should read 'groups' obviously. Volker msg03189/pgp0.pgp Desc

Bug in HEAD: srv_samr_nt.c and smbgroupedit assume algorithmic RIDs.

2002-09-25 Thread Volker.Lendecke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! srv_samr_nt.c assumes algorithmic mapping for creation of new users. In lines 3891 and 3956 it calls pdb_gid_to_group_rid to create a new rid. For non-algorithmic passdb backends it should call the backend for a new rid. The same applies to smbg