Urban Widmark wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, John Newbigin wrote:
>
>
>>I have updated my patches to work against linux 2.4.18. I have had some
>>problems with my patches failing fsx-linux. For now I have reverted to
>>using smb_proc_trunc (which is a SMBwrite call). This works but leads
>>me
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, John Newbigin wrote:
> I have updated my patches to work against linux 2.4.18. I have had some
> problems with my patches failing fsx-linux. For now I have reverted to
> using smb_proc_trunc (which is a SMBwrite call). This works but leads
> me to beleive that there may be
I have done a bit more work on CIFS extensions for UNIX in smbfs. I
have had some success and found some problems.
I have updated my patches to work against linux 2.4.18. I have had some
problems with my patches failing fsx-linux. For now I have reverted to
using smb_proc_trunc (which is a
