Hello Buck,
Buck Huppmann wrote:
i'm also seeing some aberrant ACL-setting behavior in samba 2.2.8. more-
over, the new Creator Owner and Creator Group semantics are bewildering,
although i can understand if, in that sense, they're just mimicking NT
behavior all the more closely. at any rate,
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 02:54:27PM +0200, Michael Steffens wrote:
From my understanding Samba has no other choice than inserting missing
object ACEs, because it's impossible to set a POSIX ACL without. The
crucial point not being whether, but what to insert. What does the
client intend when
i'm also seeing some aberrant ACL-setting behavior in samba 2.2.8. more-
over, the new Creator Owner and Creator Group semantics are bewildering,
although i can understand if, in that sense, they're just mimicking NT
behavior all the more closely. at any rate, below's a patch that purports
to do
Jan Houstek wrote:
server:
linux 2.4.19 with xfs 1.2 and its ACL
libacl 2.0.19
samba 2.2.8 compiled from source with --with-acl-support
acting as PDC
interesting parts of smb.conf
create mask = 0600
directory mask = 0700
Michael Steffens wrote:
I could (almost) reproduce it on HP-UX, and (almost) fix it
using inherit acls = Yes. :)
Both almost refer to mask (or class, respectively) behaving
a bit strange. But this might be platform specific.
Yes. inherit acls = yes solves my problem. Thanks to all who
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 19:43:18 +
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jan Houstek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Samba technical list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Problems with ACLs in
2.2.8 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; +0100
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type
Hello Jeff,
Jeff Mandel wrote:
As long as you're having a look, will you give a look at the mode
problem at file create time? In some cases samba over-rides the umask
and inherited acls and creates the file as r--r--r--. Only samba's force
create will kind of fix that. It's like the
Hi all!
I posted this in [EMAIL PROTECTED] but there were no reactions.
Particulary I'm interested if anyone observe the same behavior.
-- Honza Houstek
--
server:
linux 2.4.19 with xfs 1.2 and its ACL
libacl 2.0.19
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 08:39:22PM +0100, Jan Houstek wrote:
Hi all!
I posted this in [EMAIL PROTECTED] but there were no reactions.
Particulary I'm interested if anyone observe the same behavior.
I'll take a look at this.
Jeremy.