Re: Problems with ACLs in 2.2.8

2003-04-01 Thread Michael Steffens
Hello Buck, Buck Huppmann wrote: i'm also seeing some aberrant ACL-setting behavior in samba 2.2.8. more- over, the new Creator Owner and Creator Group semantics are bewildering, although i can understand if, in that sense, they're just mimicking NT behavior all the more closely. at any rate,

Re: Problems with ACLs in 2.2.8

2003-04-01 Thread Buck Huppmann
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 02:54:27PM +0200, Michael Steffens wrote: From my understanding Samba has no other choice than inserting missing object ACEs, because it's impossible to set a POSIX ACL without. The crucial point not being whether, but what to insert. What does the client intend when

Re: Problems with ACLs in 2.2.8

2003-03-31 Thread Buck Huppmann
i'm also seeing some aberrant ACL-setting behavior in samba 2.2.8. more- over, the new Creator Owner and Creator Group semantics are bewildering, although i can understand if, in that sense, they're just mimicking NT behavior all the more closely. at any rate, below's a patch that purports to do

Re: Problems with ACLs in 2.2.8

2003-03-25 Thread Michael Steffens
Jan Houstek wrote: server: linux 2.4.19 with xfs 1.2 and its ACL libacl 2.0.19 samba 2.2.8 compiled from source with --with-acl-support acting as PDC interesting parts of smb.conf create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700

Re: Problems with ACLs in 2.2.8 (solved)

2003-03-25 Thread Jan Houstek
Michael Steffens wrote: I could (almost) reproduce it on HP-UX, and (almost) fix it using inherit acls = Yes. :) Both almost refer to mask (or class, respectively) behaving a bit strange. But this might be platform specific. Yes. inherit acls = yes solves my problem. Thanks to all who

Re: Problems with ACLs in 2.2.8

2003-03-25 Thread Jeff Mandel
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 19:43:18 + From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jan Houstek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Samba technical list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Problems with ACLs in 2.2.8 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; +0100 References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type

Re: Problems with ACLs in 2.2.8

2003-03-25 Thread Michael Steffens
Hello Jeff, Jeff Mandel wrote: As long as you're having a look, will you give a look at the mode problem at file create time? In some cases samba over-rides the umask and inherited acls and creates the file as r--r--r--. Only samba's force create will kind of fix that. It's like the

Problems with ACLs in 2.2.8

2003-03-24 Thread Jan Houstek
Hi all! I posted this in [EMAIL PROTECTED] but there were no reactions. Particulary I'm interested if anyone observe the same behavior. -- Honza Houstek -- server: linux 2.4.19 with xfs 1.2 and its ACL libacl 2.0.19

Re: Problems with ACLs in 2.2.8

2003-03-24 Thread jra
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 08:39:22PM +0100, Jan Houstek wrote: Hi all! I posted this in [EMAIL PROTECTED] but there were no reactions. Particulary I'm interested if anyone observe the same behavior. I'll take a look at this. Jeremy.