On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 05:54:17PM +0200, Nir Livni wrote:
> Any list of affected source files would be appreciated.
I have replied to Nir privately off-list.
Jeremy.
: Nir Livni
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Question - Latest security alery of samba
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003, Nir Livni wrote:
> I've read the announcement carefully.
> The announcement does not point a specific threat in the samba code.
> It mentions that "This version of
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003, Nir Livni wrote:
> I've read the announcement carefully.
> The announcement does not point a specific threat in the samba code.
> It mentions that "This version of Samba adds explicit overrun and overflow
> checks on
> fragment re-assembly of SMB/CIFS packets to ensure that on
]
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2003 4:31 PM
To: Nir Livni; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Question - Latest security alery of samba
On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 04:27:04PM +0200, Nir Livni wrote:
> Hi all,
> Just wanted to know if the latest security alert is all about
> quotas.c. An upgrade (for
On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 04:27:04PM +0200, Nir Livni wrote:
> Hi all,
> Just wanted to know if the latest security alert is all about quotas.c.
> An upgrade (for me) is a bit problematic at the moment.
> If I patch this specific source code myself and recompile smbd - is it
> (basically) enough ?
No
Hi all,
Just wanted to know if the latest security alert is all about quotas.c.
An upgrade (for me) is a bit problematic at the moment.
If I patch this specific source code myself and recompile smbd - is it
(basically) enough ?
Thanks,
Nir
