On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 07:49:48AM +0100, Juergen Hasch wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >So if I'm understanding you correctly this is actually a kernel
> >bug - correct ?
> >
> >Can you point me at the areas in the kernel source where the problem
> >occurs so I can see how to make smbd work
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So if I'm understanding you correctly this is actually a kernel
bug - correct ?
Can you point me at the areas in the kernel source where the problem
occurs so I can see how to make smbd work around it until we get the
kernel fixed.
No it's Samba receiving a signal fr
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 11:39:27PM +0100, Juergen Hasch wrote:
> >
> >
> >Can you give me more details please about where smbd is missing
> >the signal ? smbd should not be able to miss these signals, as
> >all they do is set a flag that is then processed inline in the
> >main loop.
> >
> >Please g
Below is my test program, nothing special:
/* test change notification */
#include
#include
int main()
{
DWORD dwWaitStatus;
HANDLE dwChangeHandles[1];
dwChangeHandles[0] = FindFirstChangeNotification(
"i:\\TEST", // directory to watch
FALSE, // d
Can you give me more details please about where smbd is missing
the signal ? smbd should not be able to miss these signals, as
all they do is set a flag that is then processed inline in the
main loop.
Please give me more details asap.
For testing I have a simple windows program to activates c
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 11:06:46PM +0100, Juergen Hasch wrote:
> Jeremy,
>
> I'm having problems with change notification in Samba 2.2.x under Linux
> since you changed the signal
> handling stuff some time ago.
> An application I'm using always complains about missing change
> notification, alt
