On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 16:35, John E. Malmberg wrote:
> Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 16:10, John E. Malmberg wrote:
> >
> > The exception is much more than that - all sorts of things go over
> > IPC$, and they are protected by their individual ACLs. Enumerating
> > users,
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 16:10, John E. Malmberg wrote:
The exception is much more than that - all sorts of things go over
IPC$, and they are protected by their individual ACLs. Enumerating
users, all sorts of things. Domain logons are a particular thing
that occour init
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 16:10, John E. Malmberg wrote:
> Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > In Samba, access by the guest user is determined per-share, so I'm
> > not sure exactly what you mean here.
>
> The NT behavior is that if the guest account is enabled, than if any
> shares have the "everyone" grou
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
In Samba, access by the guest user is determined per-share, so I'm
not sure exactly what you mean here.
The NT behavior is that if the guest account is enabled, than if any
shares have the "everyone" group associated with them, then the shares
can be accessed from any LA
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 14:48, John E. Malmberg wrote:
> Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 13:16, John E. Malmberg wrote:
> >
> >> On a related note, does SAMBA still use the guest account in place
> >> of the (unkown) internal user for enumerating shares?
> >>
> >> An NT client
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 13:16, John E. Malmberg wrote:
On a related note, does SAMBA still use the guest account in place
of the (unkown) internal user for enumerating shares?
An NT client can not browse a SAMBA server with the guest account
disabled, but having a guest
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 13:16, John E. Malmberg wrote:
> Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>
> > Because the Guest account is a 'well known' account, and as such
> > should have a fixed RID. This is enforced via the passdb backend
> > because to do otherwise would have nasty consequences when mapping
> > b
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Because the Guest account is a 'well known' account, and as such
should have a fixed RID. This is enforced via the passdb backend
because to do otherwise would have nasty consequences when mapping
back and forth between uids and RIDs. (We are working hard to ensure
tha
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 10:59, Bradley W. Langhorst wrote:
> Is that statement true?
Yes, or also use the unixsam backend
> if so why?
Because the Guest account is a 'well known' account, and as such should
have a fixed RID. This is enforced via the passdb backend because to do
otherwise would ha
