Rashkae wrote:
Well, yes, I see your point about smbfs mounting the file system in single
user, but I see s many ways to quickly get around that
Assuming your passwords are stored in properly read protected files, why
could you not configure smbfs to mount the file system somewhere in the
Well, yes, I see your point about smbfs mounting the file system in single
user, but I see s many ways to quickly get around that
Assuming your passwords are stored in properly read protected files, why
could you not configure smbfs to mount the file system somewhere in the
users home dire
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Rashkae wrote:
> On a side note: I think a reason that your comments attracted so much
> critism is not because people think samba doesn't take corruption
> seriously (I'm a big fan of Samba and samba team myself,, and I think the
> level of support offered on the mailing list
