On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 12:06:23PM -0500, Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
:
> SMB is properiety of whom
It's all in my book. http://ubiqx/org/cifs/
SMB was created by IBM, but is now under Microsoft's control. Almost
entirely.
> just curious how does samba team cope up with changes that microsoft
> SMB is properiety of whom
Microsoft and others
> just curious how does samba team cope up with changes that microsoft makes
> in their cifs.
> do they put it out there in open as what they are using and what not
Microsoft has not (barely) documented it's protocol. The samba
developers have prog
31, 2002 11:33 AM
To: Javid Abdul-AJAVID1
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Samba and CIFS question
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 09:20:03AM -0500, Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
:
> > Is samba implments CIFS.
Yes, Samba is a CIFS implementation.
> > I thought CIFS is
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 09:20:03AM -0500, Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
:
> > Is samba implments CIFS.
Yes, Samba is a CIFS implementation.
> > I thought CIFS is based on SMB
Yes, CIFS (Common Internet FileSystem) is Microsoft's marketing name for
SMB.
> > am assuming SMB is opensource protocol
> > Is samba implments CIFS.
> > I thought CIFS is based on SMB
> > am assuming SMB is opensource protocol
CIFS is the new name microsoft gave to the smb protocol their clients
speak.
> > Just wondering if am running samba 2.2.5 does it mean am running CIFS
> > also what version of CIFS?
It does
> Hi all,
> Is samba implments CIFS.
> I thought CIFS is based on SMB
> am assuming SMB is opensource protocol
> Just wondering if am running samba 2.2.5 does it mean am running CIFS
> also what version of CIFS?
> when i sniffing SMB packets which commands should i be looking at CIFS or
SMB
