>The SNIA doc says similar things about DOS LM1.2X002 vs. LM1.2X002 and DOS
>LANMAN2.1 vs. LANMAN2.1, particularly that with the DOS dialects the OS/2
>codes had to be mapped to DOS codes. So if the OS/2 codes are a
>superset... It would be interesting to see the mappings.
Chris,
The OS/2 Erro
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 03:01:34PM -0500, Steven French wrote:
> OS/2 had 16 bit errors - basically the ERRdos range (SMB error class) is
> mostly error codes introduced in OS/2 development and could be just as
> easily named "ERRos2"
The old X/Open doc says (in its description of availabel diale
OS/2 had 16 bit errors - basically the ERRdos range (SMB error class) is
mostly error codes introduced in OS/2 development and could be just as
easily named "ERRos2"
Summary:
A) DOS error class - the most important one. Most programs had to
understand this range of errors. It had at least fou
