I have been trying to get the bug fix from Sun, and based on the trusses
I have sent, they believe that the problem I'm having is not the same as
that reported in the bug 4700402. They are working on those trusses now.
From my experience with this problem and the way I've seen others
describe i
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 07:48:30PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Is this bug being entirely handled by Sun? Or will there be
> > a samba update as part of the pending fix?
>
> It's a Solaris kernel bug so a Samba update isn't needed.
For which the working patch is currently in testing-mo
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 12:00:15PM -0500, Haley, Kevin (K.A.) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've read the discussion in the list archives regarding the
> Solaris fnctl problem which appears to be related to the
> lingering problem our site is having since recent migration to
> 2.2.6 for our print server (S
Hello,
I've read the discussion in the list archives regarding the
Solaris fnctl problem which appears to be related to the
lingering problem our site is having since recent migration to
2.2.6 for our print server (Solaris 8, smbd processes hanging
around with high CPU utilization and truss'ed re