ECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Michael Steffens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 11:46 AM
To: Ken Cross
Cc: 'Mike Sweet'; 'Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-TECHNICAL'
Subject: Re: Winbindd limited by select
Ken Cross wrote:
> I was suggesting
Ken Cross wrote:
I was suggesting the other way around -- the number of winbindd fd's
shouldn't be more than the max # of smbd's (well, maybe a *few* more).
But if you are having a system hard limit of 1024 FDs per process,
for example, which you can't raise via setrlimit, you could only
configu
Ken Cross wrote:
My $0.02...
Mike Sweet wrote:
Sooo, my recommendations are as follows:
1. Provide a configure option (--with-maxfiles or similar)
to configure the upper limit you want to support in SAMBA.
2. Provide a smb.conf option to control the max number of
file descri
Cc: 'Mike Sweet'; 'Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-TECHNICAL'
Subject: Re: Winbindd limited by select
Ken Cross wrote:
> My $0.02...
>
>
> Mike Sweet wrote:
>
>>Sooo, my recommendations are as follows:
>>
>>1. Provide a configure optio
Michael Steffens wrote:
Mike Sweet wrote:
Sooo, my recommendations are as follows:
1. Provide a configure option (--with-maxfiles or similar)
to configure the upper limit you want to support in SAMBA.
2. Provide a smb.conf option to control the max number of
file descripto
Ken Cross wrote:
My $0.02...
Mike Sweet wrote:
Sooo, my recommendations are as follows:
1. Provide a configure option (--with-maxfiles or similar)
to configure the upper limit you want to support in SAMBA.
2. Provide a smb.conf option to control the max number of
file descri
My $0.02...
Mike Sweet wrote:
> Sooo, my recommendations are as follows:
>
> 1. Provide a configure option (--with-maxfiles or similar)
>to configure the upper limit you want to support in SAMBA.
> 2. Provide a smb.conf option to control the max number of
>file descriptor
Mike Sweet wrote:
Sooo, my recommendations are as follows:
1. Provide a configure option (--with-maxfiles or similar)
to configure the upper limit you want to support in SAMBA.
2. Provide a smb.conf option to control the max number of
file descriptors.
3. Provide a defin
Michael Steffens wrote:
...
I'm wondering, basically concerning all platforms, whether this
is about the size of fd_set, or about the number of FDs the
kernel will actually assign to a process.
If the latter one is not limited, wouldn't a single excessive FD
consumer impact other processes?
Som
ROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 7:39 AM
To: David Collier-Brown -- Customer Engineering
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ken Cross; 'Multiple recipients of list
SAMBA-TECHNICAL'
Subject: Re: Winbindd limited by select
David Collier-Brown -- Customer Engineering wrote:
> Ken Cros
David Collier-Brown -- Customer Engineering wrote:
Ken Cross wrote:
#define FD_SETSIZE 2048 /* Max # of winbindd connections */
must occur before the first invocation of .
This could be a build option, but it might be much simpler to hard-code
it in local.h, which is what I did to fix it.
Ca
Michael Steffens wrote:
Ken Cross wrote:
There is pretty much a one-to-one correspondence between the number of
smbd processes open (i.e. connected users) and winbindd file descriptors
(per fstat).
Hmm, it may be platform specific. smbd connects winbindd both directly
and via NSS. On HP-UX it
Ken Cross wrote:
> > #define FD_SETSIZE 2048 /* Max # of winbindd connections */
> >
> > must occur before the first invocation of .
> >
> > This could be a build option, but it might be much simpler to hard-code
> > it in local.h, which is what I did to fix it.
> >
> > Can somebody check the imp
Ken Cross wrote:
There is pretty much a one-to-one correspondence between the number of
smbd processes open (i.e. connected users) and winbindd file descriptors
(per fstat).
Hmm, it may be platform specific. smbd connects winbindd both directly
and via NSS. On HP-UX it consumes two client pipes
Original Message-
From: Esh, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 7:34 PM
To: 'Martin Pool'; Michael Steffens
Cc: Ken Cross; 'Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-TECHNICAL'
Subject: RE: Winbindd limited by select
Better yet: Have winbindd fork
7;Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-TECHNICAL'
> Subject: Re: Winbindd limited by select
>
>
> On 12 Feb 2003, Michael Steffens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It's 60 by default after installation, but is tunable (with reboot).
>
> Maybe hp should se
On 12 Feb 2003, Michael Steffens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's 60 by default after installation, but is tunable (with reboot).
Maybe hp should sell per-fd licences :-/
> The solution (and this should also work on other platforms) was to
> have winbindd housekeep its client connections by shu
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 10:23:14PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Better still why not use poll() instead of select() in the winbindd
> > main loop?
>
> Because not everyone has poll() :-(. Some have poll build on select.
> Some people have poll() and it doesn't work So many bugs, so
> l
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 09:03:54AM +1100, Tim Potter wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 04:26:21PM -0500, Michael B. Allen wrote:
>
> > > This is set at compile-time, not run-time. This line:
> > >
> > > #define FD_SETSIZE 2048 /* Max # of winbindd connections */
> > >
> > > must occur before t
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 04:26:21PM -0500, Michael B. Allen wrote:
> > This is set at compile-time, not run-time. This line:
> >
> > #define FD_SETSIZE 2048 /* Max # of winbindd connections */
> >
> > must occur before the first invocation of .
> >
> > This could be a build option, but it mig
Storage Solutions
Phone 865.675.4070 ext 31
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Michael B. Allen
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 4:26 PM
To: Ken Cross
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Winbindd limited by select
On Wed
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003 07:36:19 -0500
"Ken Cross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've run into a problem with winbindd in both 2.2.x and 3.0 where it
> just locks up after a while on large, busy networks.
>
> We finally tracked down the problem to the fact that the C library
> "select" function is lim
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 07:36:19AM -0500, Ken Cross wrote:
> Samba-folk:
>
> I've run into a problem with winbindd in both 2.2.x and 3.0 where it
> just locks up after a while on large, busy networks.
>
> We finally tracked down the problem to the fact that the C library
> "select" function is li
Hi Ken,
Ken Cross wrote:
I've run into a problem with winbindd in both 2.2.x and 3.0 where it
just locks up after a while on large, busy networks.
We finally tracked down the problem to the fact that the C library
"select" function is limited by default to 256 file descriptors in
NetBSD (1024 in
ED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 7:36
> To: 'Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-TECHNICAL'
> Subject: Winbindd limited by select
>
>
> Samba-folk:
>
> I've run into a problem with winbindd in both 2.2.x and 3.0 where it
> just locks up after a while
Samba-folk:
I've run into a problem with winbindd in both 2.2.x and 3.0 where it
just locks up after a while on large, busy networks.
We finally tracked down the problem to the fact that the C library
"select" function is limited by default to 256 file descriptors in
NetBSD (1024 in FreeBSD, 2048
26 matches
Mail list logo
